Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/22931
Title: | Rating vs. preference : a comparative study of self-reporting |
Authors: | Yannakakis, Georgios N. Hallam, John |
Keywords: | Computer games Human-computer interaction |
Issue Date: | 2011 |
Publisher: | Springer |
Citation: | Yannakakis, G. N., & Hallam, J., (2011). Rating vs. preference : a comparative study of self-reporting. International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, Memphis. |
Abstract: | This paper introduces a comparative analysis between rating and pairwise self-reporting via questionnaires in user survey experiments. Two dissimilar game user survey experiments are employed in which the two questionnaire schemes are tested and compared for reliable affect annotation. The statistical analysis followed to test our hypotheses shows that even though the two self-reporting schemes are consistent there are significant order of reporting effects when subjects report via a rating questionnaire. The paper concludes with a discussion of the appropriateness of each self-reporting scheme under conditions drawn from the experimental results obtained. |
URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/22931 |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - InsDG |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Erratum_Ranking_vs_Preference_A_Comparative_Study_.pdf | 182.21 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.