Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30576
Title: The risk-adjusted performance of alternative investment funds and UCITS : a comparative analysis
Authors: Camilleri, Silvio John
Farrugia, Ritienne
Keywords: European Parliament. Alternative investment fund managers directive
Investments -- Law and legislation -- European Union countries
Finance -- European Union countries
Finance -- Law and legislation -- European Union countries
Investments -- Law and legislation -- European Union countries
Investments -- European Union countries
Mutual funds -- Law and legislation -- European Union countries
Issue Date: 2018-05
Publisher: Canadian Center of Science and Education
Citation: Camilleri, S. J., & Farrugia, R. (2018). The risk-adjusted performance of alternative investment funds and UCITS : a comparative analysis. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 10(7), 23-37.
Abstract: This study evaluates the performance of a selection of Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs), and Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Funds (UCITS) which followed a global geographic focus strategy during the period 2010-2016. These two fund structures are governed by different regulatory frameworks, which have evolved and re-shaped over the years. Various yardsticks are employed to evaluate the risk-adjusted performance of the sampled funds, and Monte-Carlo simulations are used to gauge the possible out-of-sample returns. Most of the sampled funds underperformed the benchmark index in terms of their Sharpe and Treynor ratios. Whilst UCITS registered a better overall performance, AIFs outperformed UCITS towards the end of the sample period. This suggests that investors should not assume that one fund structure is inherently superior to the other, since the relative performance may vary over time.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/30576
ISSN: 1916971X
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacEMABF

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Published Paper.pdfMain article674.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.