<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/106940" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/106940</id>
  <updated>2026-04-17T00:56:05Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-17T00:56:05Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Evaluating the use of complementary therapies amongst patients undergoing radiotherapy in Malta</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/109806" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/109806</id>
    <updated>2023-05-26T07:30:40Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Evaluating the use of complementary therapies amongst patients undergoing radiotherapy in Malta
Abstract: Purpose&#xD;
Limited research is found on the use of complementary therapies (CTs) amongst cancer &#xD;
patients in Malta. The purpose of this study was to assess the awareness and use of &#xD;
complementary therapies amongst patients undergoing radiotherapy in the oncology &#xD;
hospital in Malta.&#xD;
Objectives&#xD;
This study aimed to determine whether patient demographics affect the use of CTs, to &#xD;
investigate the patients’ awareness on locally available CTs and, to evaluate the &#xD;
willingness of patients to make use of locally available CTs.&#xD;
Methodology&#xD;
The research adopted a cross-sectional, non-experimental, prospective and descriptive &#xD;
research design. A quantitative approach with the addition of some qualitative aspects &#xD;
was employed. The data was collected using a self-designed questionnaire and &#xD;
distributed to all patients undergoing radical radiotherapy. Statistical tests were &#xD;
performed to analyse the data obtained from these findings.&#xD;
Results&#xD;
From a total of 140 accessible participants, 91 questionnaires were returned completed, &#xD;
giving a response rate of 65%. Findings revealed a higher percentage of females who had &#xD;
made use of complementary therapies (57.8% (n=91)). Patients aged 18-47 were the &#xD;
highest category who reported having used CTs (76.9% (n=91)). Respondents having a &#xD;
higher educational level had used complementary therapies the most (82.6%). &#xD;
Additionally, 88% (n=91) of participants were aware of at least 1 complementary therapy, &#xD;
the most common being massage (68.1%) followed by yoga (58.2%) and dietary &#xD;
supplements (46.2%). Overall, 96.6% (n=91) of patients were willing to make use of &#xD;
complementary therapies.&#xD;
Conclusions&#xD;
Results revealed the willingness of patients to use complementary therapies if freely &#xD;
offered within the state oncology hospital. Many patients were aware of at least one &#xD;
complementary therapy, however, the majority felt that more complementary therapies &#xD;
should be offered in Malta. It was recommended that further information on each type &#xD;
of complementary therapy should be made available to patients.
Description: B.Sc. (Hons)(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patients’ perception on waiting times during the radiotherapy pathway</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/109804" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/109804</id>
    <updated>2023-05-26T07:29:07Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Patients’ perception on waiting times during the radiotherapy pathway
Abstract: Purpose: Prolonged waiting times can have a negative impact on the physical psychosocial &#xD;
well-being of cancer patients and have to be assessed.&#xD;
Objectives: The objectives of the study were to develop and administer a questionnaire to &#xD;
cancer patients treated with radiotherapy to evaluate their perception of waiting times &#xD;
throughout the radiotherapy treatment. Demographic and social factors that may have an &#xD;
impact on the patients perception on radiotherapy waiting times were also assessed. &#xD;
Factors that could improve the patients’ overall experience were also evaluated.&#xD;
Methodology: A cross-sectional, prospective, quantitative research design was used for the &#xD;
study. A self-designed questionnaire was distributed by intermediaries to all patients &#xD;
treated with radiotherapy in the months of March and April at the local oncology hospital. &#xD;
The questionnaire consisted of closed-ended questions with some open ended questions. &#xD;
The data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics (Chi-square test, &#xD;
Friedman Test, and the Kruskal Wallis tests).&#xD;
Results: Forty-six out of sixty respondents completed the questionnaire. The majority of the &#xD;
patients rated the waiting times for radiotherapy as acceptable (37%) or highly acceptable &#xD;
(47.8%). Disruptions in daily routine was the most important factor affecting distress &#xD;
among female patients whereas males selected ‘maintaining a full bladder’ for causing the &#xD;
most distress. The majority of the patients (54%) agreed that the addition of background &#xD;
music in the waiting area could improve their waiting experience&#xD;
Conclusion:&#xD;
Overall the patients were satisfied with the waiting times for their radiotherapy treatment.
Description: B.Sc. (Hons)(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Designing symptom specific dietary leaflets for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy : a delphi study</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/109803" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/109803</id>
    <updated>2023-05-26T07:27:36Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Designing symptom specific dietary leaflets for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy : a delphi study
Abstract: Purpose: To develop dietary leaflets that have reached consensus among &#xD;
healthcare professionals, that patients suffering from common Head and Neck (HN)&#xD;
Radiotherapy (RT) induced side effects can refer to for nutritional advice. These &#xD;
leaflets can be used in clinical practice for patients to maintain good nutritional &#xD;
status and cope better with the treatment.&#xD;
Objectives: To have a multi-disciplinary panel of participants working in an &#xD;
oncology centre in Malta reach consensus while developing dietary leaflets for use&#xD;
by patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy.&#xD;
Methodology: A Delphi approach was used. A panel of experts reviewed a series of &#xD;
dietary leaflets developed based on literature review. The panel was asked for &#xD;
feedback on these leaflets, amendments were made, and the leaflets were re-circulated                                    &#xD;
over three rounds. After each round, participants would vote on major &#xD;
changes and vote on the likelihood of them using the leaflets in a clinical setting. &#xD;
Consensus was achieved when all participants identified that they would use the &#xD;
leaflets in clinical practice.&#xD;
Results: Participants reached consensus regarding the overall quality of the leaflets, &#xD;
with all participants voting “high likelihood” to use in their own clinical practice. &#xD;
Although individual items had opposite opinions (use of sugary gum vs. non-sugary &#xD;
gum), overall consensus was reached. Four final leaflets addressing: oral mucositis, &#xD;
xerostomia, taste loss, and radiation-induced nausea and vomiting were achieved.&#xD;
Conclusion: The participants reached consensus and developed leaflets that were &#xD;
based on literature recommendations for use for patients that, in their opinion, &#xD;
were acceptable for clinical use. The Delphi method was a good method to achieve &#xD;
the objective of this study.
Description: B.Sc. (Hons)(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Optimisation of the CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) scan protocol at a local general hospital in Malta</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/109801" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/109801</id>
    <updated>2023-05-26T07:24:18Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Optimisation of the CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) scan protocol at a local general hospital in Malta
Abstract: Purpose &#xD;
Due to the increase in CTPA examinations being performed locally and the relative &#xD;
radiation risks associated with it, this study aimed at optimising the current CTPA &#xD;
protocol (100 kV with 50% IR) present at a local public general hospital in Malta by &#xD;
using a lower kV technique combined with a high Iterative Reconstruction (IR) (&gt;50%) &#xD;
value.&#xD;
Objectives &#xD;
To identify the optimal IR value through a phantom study. Apply this in combination &#xD;
with a lower kV technique as the experimental protocol in the clinical setting and &#xD;
compare it to the current protocol in terms of radiation dose and image quality. &#xD;
Methodology &#xD;
The study was divided into 2 phases. Phase 1 consisted of an experimental study &#xD;
using an anthropomorphic phantom to identify the optimal IR value to be used in &#xD;
combination with the lower kV technique. During phase 2, 64 patients were recruited &#xD;
and equally divided into a control and experimental groups. The patients forming &#xD;
part of the control group were scanned using the current protocol while another 32 &#xD;
patients were imaged using the experimental protocol. The volume CT dose index &#xD;
(CTDIVOL), dose length product (DLP), size specific dose estimate (SSDE) and effective &#xD;
dose (ED) were calculated. Objective image quality was recorded in terms of contrast &#xD;
to noise ratio (CNR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR). Subjective image evaluation was &#xD;
performed by 3 radiologists performing Absolute Visual Grading Analysis (VGA) to &#xD;
assess image quality by using an image quality score tool. The resultant image quality &#xD;
scores were analysed using Visual Grading Characteristics (VGC). &#xD;
Results &#xD;
From the image quality and dose results in phase 1, the optimal scan protocol was &#xD;
found to be 60% IR combined with 80kV. The application of this protocol in a clinical &#xD;
setting resulted in a reduction (p&lt;0.05) in mean CTDIVOL (49%), DLP (48%), SSDE (52%) &#xD;
and effective dose (49%). Objective image quality was improved (p&lt;0.05) both in CNR &#xD;
(32%) and SNR (13%). Subjective image quality scores were higher for the current &#xD;
protocol but variation between the two protocols was not significant (p&gt;0.05).&#xD;
Conclusions&#xD;
The results suggested that when applying the experimental protocol (80kV combined &#xD;
with 60% IR), radiation dose was reduced by approximately 50%, while still &#xD;
maintaining image quality at an acceptable diagnostic level.
Description: M.Sc. Radiography(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

