<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/110996" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/110996</id>
  <updated>2026-04-16T02:58:11Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-16T02:58:11Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>“No politics zone” : critical approaches to education research in the Arab Gulf States</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111065" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111065</id>
    <updated>2023-07-03T09:54:34Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: “No politics zone” : critical approaches to education research in the Arab Gulf States
Abstract: This special issue emerged from a virtual panel hosted by the&#xD;
Centre for Culture, Identity, and Education at the University of&#xD;
British Columbia 2021. The focus of the panel came about&#xD;
through discussions the three editors had in relation to their area&#xD;
of study – education policy in three different Arab Gulf states –&#xD;
Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait. While International Development&#xD;
Organizations (IDOs) have marketed policy reform as a way for&#xD;
“developing countries” to “catch up” with the developed world,&#xD;
often, these policies ignore the political context in which they&#xD;
unfold. This special issue argues that even amid all the reforms&#xD;
adopted across the Arab Gulf States (AGS), there have been&#xD;
things impossible to change, red lines impossible to cross, and&#xD;
also exceptional cases of change in what is deemed impossible&#xD;
contexts. This issue seeks to expose what remains undiscussed&#xD;
in this drive for reform in these postcolonial contexts and the&#xD;
inherited political and social structures that the policies overlook.&#xD;
Hence, this issue attempts to capture the contextual changes and&#xD;
continuities in each context where “injustice, oppression, and&#xD;
destruction caused by capitalism, colonialism, and patriarchy”&#xD;
continues manifesting in our educational spaces (de Sousa&#xD;
Santos, 2018, p.1). [excerpt]</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pedagogies of nation-building : contesting modernities and modernizing schools in (post)colonial Bahrain</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111064" />
    <author>
      <name>Musaifer, Sara J.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111064</id>
    <updated>2023-06-28T05:37:59Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Pedagogies of nation-building : contesting modernities and modernizing schools in (post)colonial Bahrain
Authors: Musaifer, Sara J.
Abstract: The purpose of this essay is to trace the gendered historical&#xD;
production of the modern school—a key political institution of&#xD;
nation-building. Focusing on 20th century colonial Bahrain, I use&#xD;
Foucauldian discourse analysis to examine archival data collected&#xD;
over 18 months in 2018-2020. I argue that the rise of modern&#xD;
education makes visible deep fissures within a dominant&#xD;
imaginary of the nation as a consolidated formation. My analysis&#xD;
illustrates how the imagined nation emerges in colonial Bahrain&#xD;
as multiple, contested, and fragmented. Modern education&#xD;
becomes a productive site for interrogating nationalist masculinist&#xD;
origin myths. I offer “pedagogies of nation-building” as a&#xD;
conceptual contribution that aims to capture the complexity and&#xD;
serendipity of sociopolitical forces enfolding and unfolding within&#xD;
the modern school. I end by reflecting on the implications of my&#xD;
conceptual arguments on education reform initiatives and&#xD;
pedagogical practices.</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Looking back to move forward : internationalization at Qatar University</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111063" />
    <author>
      <name>Al-Muftah, Esraa A.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111063</id>
    <updated>2023-06-28T05:38:34Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Looking back to move forward : internationalization at Qatar University
Authors: Al-Muftah, Esraa A.
Abstract: Calls to “re-think” and “re-define” internationalization of higher&#xD;
education (IoHE) have been increasingly noted in the literature&#xD;
(Heleta &amp; Chasi, 2022). This article takes the institutional archives&#xD;
of Qatar University to look back and consider what the past could&#xD;
mean for the future of internationalization on the campus. I&#xD;
highlight the importance of studying the context of Qatar&#xD;
University in which internationalization unfolds, including its&#xD;
institutional history and geopolitical surroundings. By examining&#xD;
the historical, cultural, and social contexts/networks in which QU&#xD;
is embedded, I argue that QU has been portrayed as an&#xD;
international project from the onset, although one motivated by&#xD;
Third-Worldist, Islamic, and Arab notions of solidarity and, equally&#xD;
importantly, one critical of Western hegemony. While I am&#xD;
cautious of romanticizing the past, I discuss how looking&#xD;
backward helps IoHE scholars think less of internationalization as&#xD;
a fixed phenomenon and moves the goal toward offering a more&#xD;
plural understanding of what internationalization can mean in&#xD;
different contexts. Through this case study of QU, I contribute to&#xD;
efforts within this critical strand of research to recenter IoHE&#xD;
conversations from “Euro-American-centric internationalisation&#xD;
definitions, strategies, policies, approaches, and practices” to&#xD;
other parts of the world (Heleta &amp; Chasi, 2022, p. 2).</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The uncompleted reforms : the political mechanisms of reforming educational systems in the Arab Gulf States</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111062" />
    <author>
      <name>Alhouti, Ibrahim</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111062</id>
    <updated>2023-06-28T05:34:41Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The uncompleted reforms : the political mechanisms of reforming educational systems in the Arab Gulf States
Authors: Alhouti, Ibrahim
Abstract: During the past two decades, the Arab Gulf states (AGS) have&#xD;
invested heavily in reforming both the K-12 and higher education&#xD;
systems in the belief that this might improve the human capital&#xD;
and enable the region to shift toward a knowledge economy instead&#xD;
of relying on hydrocarbon as the primary source of state income.&#xD;
Yet, after this long period, these systems are still underperforming,&#xD;
and the region continues to struggle with providing quality&#xD;
educational practices that enable its citizens to contribute to the&#xD;
“knowledge economy” specifically or to the future of their states&#xD;
more generally. Many international consultants have been&#xD;
involved in these reforms to develop the so-called ‘neoliberal’&#xD;
education reform agenda; many projects have been launched and&#xD;
implemented. While sporadic changes have been observed, the&#xD;
situation remains largely unchanged. The question is why these&#xD;
states have not achieved their goal: a highly-skilled nation capable&#xD;
of competing globally. Critical scholars have placed significant&#xD;
emphasis on the political mechanisms and the social&#xD;
circumstances in the process of education reform and its&#xD;
implementation (Bell &amp; Stevenson, 2006; Heck, 2004; Nitta, 2012;&#xD;
Portnoi, 2016; Taylor et al., 1997; Williams &amp; Cummings, 2005).&#xD;
In a similar vein, this article approaches the question of education&#xD;
reform in the AGS by looking at it critically from a contextual and&#xD;
political perspective, which is considered a new approach to&#xD;
studying these reforms. In doing so, the paper highlights that this&#xD;
drive for change avoided certain political and socio-economic&#xD;
matters, which may account for the low achievement and consistent underperformance of these reform initiatives in the&#xD;
education and development arenas. This article applies a&#xD;
qualitative comparative approach to examine education reform in&#xD;
the region by analysing key policy documents and relevant&#xD;
literature that studied the reform. My argument is twofold: First,&#xD;
the extensive involvement of the ruling establishment and the topdown policy process remain unchanged. Secondly, over the past&#xD;
60 years, the region has relied heavily on foreign consultants,&#xD;
which indicates a lack of confidence in the local expertise to handle&#xD;
the reforms. Also, the ‘street-level bureaucrats’ such as school&#xD;
leaders and teachers remain neglected in the policy process.&#xD;
Finally, the political and bureaucratic contexts remain&#xD;
undiscussed in reforming the education system. Matters such as&#xD;
the instability of the leadership and the bureaucratic structures&#xD;
impact the low calibre of employees in the Ministry of&#xD;
Education but are not considered in the reform process; they seem&#xD;
to be a redline for the ruling establishment. Contextual changes&#xD;
are a crucial factor in achieving successful and sustained&#xD;
educational reforms, but the AGS is unwilling to risk making these&#xD;
changes. For policymakers and education reformers in the region,&#xD;
this article offers an invitation to seriously consider the contextual&#xD;
and political dimensions and boundaries when imagining,&#xD;
articulating, and implementing future education reform initiatives.</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

