<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111185" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111185</id>
  <updated>2026-04-10T06:45:33Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-10T06:45:33Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Achieving stability in algorithmic stablecoins</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121429" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121429</id>
    <updated>2024-04-26T11:30:25Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Achieving stability in algorithmic stablecoins
Abstract: Stablecoins are designed to bridge traditional fiat currencies with the cryptocurrencies markets &#xD;
market. Stablecoins have been identified as an early solution to mitigate the risk from &#xD;
cryptocurrencies during highly-volatile periods. While our paper aims to provide a taxonomy for &#xD;
the different types of stablecoins, our research focuses on algorithmic stablecoins. &#xD;
Currently, most stablecoins have a centralised structure that makes them vulnerable to &#xD;
regulatory orders. On the other hand, algorithmic stablecoins are cryptocurrencies managed by &#xD;
algorithms (smart contracts) to minimise the volatility in relation to a less volatile asset such as &#xD;
the US dollar or other relatively stable assets. Unfortunately, most algorithmic stablecoins have &#xD;
failed to maintain their pegged value despite the innovation acceleration. &#xD;
This paper aims to identify the differences between fiat-pegged stablecoins and algorithmic &#xD;
stablecoins, create a framework to understand the different types of algorithmic stablecoins, &#xD;
identify the risk of existing solutions, and answer if algorithmic stablecoins could maintain their &#xD;
pegged value.&#xD;
Our focus will be on two attributes critical in the engineering of algorithmic stablecoins: &#xD;
seigniorage and reflexivity.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The role of blockchain and smart contracts in receiving donations towards financing of political parties : use case : Malta</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121424" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121424</id>
    <updated>2024-04-26T11:28:06Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The role of blockchain and smart contracts in receiving donations towards financing of political parties : use case : Malta
Abstract: In a healthy functioning democracy, transparency is the hallmark of good politics. Finance is &#xD;
vital in running a successful electoral process. In elections, money allows for the expression &#xD;
of political support and encourages competition. Money significantly impacts who can get &#xD;
into a political conversation and run for office. As elections get more expensive to contest and &#xD;
win, it is harder for individuals and ideologies with limited financial resources to get into the &#xD;
office. Elected representatives in many democracies often choose between voter aspirations &#xD;
and sponsor-backed agendas. This conflict of interest diminishes the voice of the voters. The &#xD;
state needs to ensure and protect its citizens' sovereignty. The more transparency and actors &#xD;
in the system, the more the voters and other constituents will trust the actors at play, and &#xD;
Blockchain may have a role to play. It is a long-standing debate on how Blockchain, where &#xD;
necessary, drives value to any business through transparency. Blockchain may signal a new&#xD;
era of transparency and reward best behaviour in political financing, as it has been doing in &#xD;
business applications. A Blockchain and Smart Contract solution may be considered for&#xD;
political actors to report their financial activities in real-time under the watchful eye of the &#xD;
state and its citizens.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Blockchain based biometric matching</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121422" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121422</id>
    <updated>2024-04-26T11:24:00Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Blockchain based biometric matching
Abstract: Blockchain technology has become a popular topic, making it possible to remove&#xD;
trusted intermediaries. This is applied to biometric technology where matching&#xD;
operations are executed in a decentralised trust-less environment via smart&#xD;
contracts. Three smart contract based blockchain based models are developed&#xD;
where practical trade-offs amongst them experimentally explored, namely&#xD;
execution time, transaction cost, complexity and the level of decentralisation&#xD;
between them. We find that with the present price of Ether common distance&#xD;
algorithms used for biometric matching such as the Euclidean distance will cost&#xD;
around $8. Costs can be reduced by introducing blockchain oracles, but this&#xD;
reduces the decentralisation level to that of a centralised system. Timings of oracle&#xD;
based transactions settling on the Ethereum main chain will also take twice as&#xD;
much time (70 seconds) of transactions made directly on-chain due to requiring the&#xD;
mining of two blockchain transactions. We find that a proof-of-stake sidechain is&#xD;
the best model tested for this purpose, providing for near instant transaction time&#xD;
(3 seconds), being low cost ($0.001) while not being overly complex and still&#xD;
enjoying a level of execution in a decentralised environment.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Electronic health records and beyond : a blockchain in healthcare review</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121421" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121421</id>
    <updated>2024-04-26T11:22:46Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Electronic health records and beyond : a blockchain in healthcare review
Abstract: The healthcare industry has undergone a radical transformation, shifting from paper-based procedures &#xD;
to electronic methods and Blockchain-based solutions. Given the technological advancements, a &#xD;
standardised, patient-centric healthcare mechanism has not yet been established. The current &#xD;
healthcare systems impose several constraints on data sharing, data access, and privacy concerns. &#xD;
Blockchain technology presents itself as a promising solution for leveraging these limitations.&#xD;
The current state of play is that Electronic Health Records are the most studied blockchain-enabled &#xD;
healthcare applications. Studies show that due to the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, research &#xD;
in Blockchain in healthcare has substantially increased, with nascent applications of Contact Tracing, &#xD;
Remote Patient Monitoring and Digital Health Passports.&#xD;
This dissertation closely reviews implementing Blockchain technologies within said healthcare &#xD;
applications by analysing aspects of data sharing, access control, data management, and privacy and &#xD;
security. To thoroughly analyse the current healthcare blockchain-based solutions, the value of smart &#xD;
contracts and accessibility types of blockchain were evaluated. The utility of the integration of other&#xD;
ground-breaking technologies was also assessed.&#xD;
Through comprehensive secondary research, this study evaluated a random sample of 32 published &#xD;
papers, which were selected according to pre-defined criteria. &#xD;
This review establishes that, in most studies, privacy, security and access control are addressed. Smart&#xD;
contracts are generally utilised for this purpose; however, many smart contract adoptions address the &#xD;
need for patient ownership, data validation and user authorisation. Permissioned platforms are the &#xD;
most used within EHR applications, honing further on the notion of establishing patient-centred &#xD;
Blockchain systems.&#xD;
This analysis also indicates that through various cryptographic primitives and the deployment of key &#xD;
management, blockchain platforms are intended to address privacy and security concerns. However, &#xD;
some studies deploy other mechanisms such as dynamic consent. The deployment of off-chain &#xD;
databases, cloud solutions, and IPFS have been carefully analysed within such studies and identified as &#xD;
possible solutions to Blockchain’s scalability limitation.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

