<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/11180" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/11180</id>
  <updated>2026-04-04T21:19:46Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-04T21:19:46Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>About our contributors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/12523" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/12523</id>
    <updated>2018-03-01T14:42:25Z</updated>
    <published>2014-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: About our contributors
Abstract: Short biographies of the contributors.</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>About our contributors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/12522" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/12522</id>
    <updated>2018-03-20T12:25:36Z</updated>
    <published>2014-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: About our contributors
Abstract: Short biographies of contributors.</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>From audiences to publics : convergence culture and the Harry Potter phenomenon</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/12521" />
    <author>
      <name>Fenech, Giuliana</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/12521</id>
    <updated>2018-03-20T12:26:38Z</updated>
    <published>2014-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: From audiences to publics : convergence culture and the Harry Potter phenomenon
Authors: Fenech, Giuliana
Abstract: In the mid-nineties, changing business and communication models influenced the way in which cultural industries operated. The spheres of public and private, production and distribution, ownership and access had to be reconsidered and were characterised by convergence culture, a commercial and creative environment based on active participation that offers support for creating and sharing interpretations and original works. Convergence culture has relatively low barriers to artistic expression and civic participation and fosters a sense of community growing around people’s common interests and ideologies. It is also a product of the relationship between communication technologies, the cultural communities that grow around them, and the activities they support.</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Enc0d1ng poetry</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/12520" />
    <author>
      <name>Chetcuti, Clara</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/12520</id>
    <updated>2018-03-20T12:27:28Z</updated>
    <published>2014-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Enc0d1ng poetry
Authors: Chetcuti, Clara
Abstract: So-called “poetry in code” mounts a doubled claim to electronic-ness and literariness, and can be dubbed “literary” precisely due to its coded nature. It would seem, then, that code requires at least as much critical consideration as the linguistic and rhetorical devices normally employed in print literature. Insofar as a legitimate codework employs code at the scripting level as a language-generator and –animator, and at the surface level as either executable or non-executable programming, to what extent can E. E. Cummings’s I Will Be (1925) be considered a poem in code? What can be inferred from a comparison between this would-be proto-codework and a canonical digital poem such as Brian Kim Stefans’s The Dreamlife of Letters (2000)? What is it that makes Cummings’ poem a potentially more remarkable codework than Stefans’s? Is it the precociousness of his coded address, or is it the fact that he anticipates the links which N. Katherine Hayles makes between code and liminal somatic states in her essay 'Traumas of Code' (2006)?</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

