<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/1126" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/1126</id>
  <updated>2026-08-16T11:27:10Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-16T11:27:10Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Manifesto for change at the Planning Authority</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148489" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148489</id>
    <updated>2026-08-14T10:58:14Z</updated>
    <published>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Manifesto for change at the Planning Authority
Abstract: The latest public&#xD;
consultation&#xD;
document on&#xD;
planning law is a&#xD;
meaningless exercise&#xD;
for it does not really&#xD;
address the crux of&#xD;
the problem. It&#xD;
continues to be an&#xD;
exercise in&#xD;
patchwork. There is&#xD;
no real in-depth&#xD;
thought behind this&#xD;
consultation. Hence,&#xD;
it is not the purpose&#xD;
of this contribution to&#xD;
waste reader’s time&#xD;
by discussing a futile&#xD;
cosmetic&#xD;
consultation.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proposals for a new human rights and equality law</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148385" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148385</id>
    <updated>2026-08-14T07:49:48Z</updated>
    <published>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Proposals for a new human rights and equality law
Abstract: Although the Equality&#xD;
Bill has been defeated&#xD;
in the House of&#xD;
Representatives, this&#xD;
should not be&#xD;
interpreted simply as&#xD;
a government&#xD;
botched attempt to&#xD;
introduce human&#xD;
rights and equality&#xD;
legislation in Malta. It&#xD;
should be considered&#xD;
as a golden&#xD;
opportunity to adopt&#xD;
a legal framework&#xD;
that suits the people&#xD;
who will have&#xD;
recourse to that law&#xD;
and any institution&#xD;
established&#xD;
thereunder.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Response to the public consultation on the EDPB guidelines 1/2026 on processing of personal data for scientific research purposes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148255" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148255</id>
    <updated>2026-07-27T11:18:44Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Response to the public consultation on the EDPB guidelines 1/2026 on processing of personal data for scientific research purposes
Abstract: We welcome the European Data Protection Board’s preparation of dedicated guidance on the processing of personal data for scientific research purposes. The Guidelines address many long-standing areas of uncertainty and have the potential to provide useful clarification concerning broad consent, further processing, transparency, data subject rights, the allocation of responsibility and safeguards under Article 89(1) GDPR.; Our comments focus primarily on the practical application of the Guidelines within universities, hospitals, research infrastructures and international research consortia. These organisations vary considerably in their financial resources and technical capacity. Measures that are proportionate for a large national research infrastructure may be difficult to implement within a smaller university, regional hospital or investigator-led research group.; We write from an academic perspective, with particular experience in neuroimaging research and research data infrastructures. Several of our examples, therefore, draw on medical imaging, brain MRI, research repositories and secondary use of health-related datasets. These examples are intended to illustrate broader issues that arise across data-intensive scientific research. However, we would recommend a stronger acknowledgement of the diversity of practices across different fields of scientific research, ideally through the active involvement of practising researchers.; The final Guidelines should therefore distinguish more clearly between mandatory legal requirements, recommended good practice, and safeguards that may be appropriate only in particular circumstances. Without that distinction, non-mandatory recommendations may be treated by institutions, ethics committees or supervisory authorities as universal compliance requirements. Additionally, in order to be effective and efficient, they should further avoid duplication of assessment and avoid introducing slippery slopes for the freedom of science.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lowering human rights and equality protection</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148142" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148142</id>
    <updated>2026-07-21T08:36:33Z</updated>
    <published>2026-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Lowering human rights and equality protection
Abstract: Human rights&#xD;
protection in Malta is&#xD;
primarily protected&#xD;
by the courts of&#xD;
constitutional&#xD;
jurisdiction, both&#xD;
under the&#xD;
Constitution of Malta&#xD;
and the European&#xD;
Convention Act, the&#xD;
latter enactment&#xD;
incorporating into&#xD;
Maltese Law the&#xD;
Council of Europe’s&#xD;
European Convention&#xD;
on Human Rights.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

