<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/112723" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/112723</id>
  <updated>2026-04-12T22:12:51Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-12T22:12:51Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>The spirit of the Reformation 500 years on : proceedings of the Malta International Theological Conference, vol. II</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113913" />
    <author>
      <name>Berry, John Anthony</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113913</id>
    <updated>2023-10-30T10:45:24Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The spirit of the Reformation 500 years on : proceedings of the Malta International Theological Conference, vol. II
Authors: Berry, John Anthony
Abstract: The commemoration of the 500th anniversary of the Protestant Reformation has gone down in history as one of the most important achievements in the ecumenical movement and in the life of the Church at large. A question that remains fundamental up till our very day is the following: “Does Martin Luther’s lived theology have anything to say to us today?” For this reason, academics and ecumenists from a number of distinguished European Universities as well as from the University of Malta came together to interpret anew the theological gifts received through the Lutheran Reformation in their appropriate historical and ecclesial context. The conference proceedings are divided in three parts: the exploration of the historical context, the major theological issues within that context, and an appraisal of the spirit of the reformation today. This endeavour revealed significant insights: a commitment to narrate the story in a different way, a celebration of the return to the sources of the Christian faith that has actually produced a process of regeneration of the faith both for Lutherans and for Catholics, and a mutual recognition can never be underestimated. Whatever its impact on history, the Reformation remains meaningful, first and foremost as a spiritual event focusing on the relationship of the self with God, as an opportunity to bring out the riches in both traditions, as well as a reminder that dialogue opens up fresh avenues of thought.; CONTRIBUTORS:; Beate Bengard, John Anthony Berry (editor), Charlo Camilleri, Rene Camilleri, Pauline Dimech, Damian Dorocki, Dominic Fenech, Ute Gause, George Grima, Oleh Kindiy, Anne Kull, Piotr Roszak, Hector Scerri and Paul Sciberras.</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Concluding reflections</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/112903" />
    <author>
      <name>Grima, George</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/112903</id>
    <updated>2023-10-26T10:15:48Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Concluding reflections
Authors: Grima, George
Abstract: After listening to the conference papers, with some discussion in &#xD;
between, there is place only for some general remarks. A rather &#xD;
obvious remark is that whatever reflections we may share with each &#xD;
other at the close of any conference, especially a conference like the one &#xD;
we have just had, can never be final. Our reflections and discussions &#xD;
can perhaps be best understood as a small part of our individual and &#xD;
collective effort to understand afresh the significance of an event that &#xD;
marked so deeply not only the history of Christianity but also so many &#xD;
cultural, economic, political and other social aspects of our life in the &#xD;
past 500 years.</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Communio sanctorum communio bonorum von Balthasar and Luther</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/112902" />
    <author>
      <name>Dimech, Pauline</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/112902</id>
    <updated>2023-10-26T10:14:06Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Communio sanctorum communio bonorum von Balthasar and Luther
Authors: Dimech, Pauline
Abstract: I have chosen not to look at the issue of sainthood and the veneration &#xD;
of the saints, nor at Luther’s arguments concerning indulgences and &#xD;
Purgatory, or the theological concepts of satisfaction, and of merit, &#xD;
or the question of personal sanctification, which are among the more &#xD;
controversial issues between Catholics and Protestants to this day. I &#xD;
have, instead, decided to examine the concept of the Communio &#xD;
Sanctorum itself, convinced that delving into the former topics often &#xD;
serves as an avoidance tactic by theologians, and that, before one &#xD;
delves into the many controversial issues associated with the theme, &#xD;
one ought to try and clarify the concept itself, since it will have to act as &#xD;
the grounding for all further discussion.&#xD;
In carrying out this hermeneutical exercise, I wish to compare the &#xD;
writings of the two great theologians: Martin Luther and Hans Urs von &#xD;
Balthasar. Considering that this paper is being written on the anniversary &#xD;
of the Reformation, Martin Luther was a compulsory choice. However, &#xD;
Luther was not just a central figure in the Reformation, he is also one of the more important theologians where the communio sanctorum is &#xD;
concerned. I chose von Balthasar not only because I am familiar with &#xD;
his writings on the communio sanctorum and on the saints, but also &#xD;
because the communio sanctorum was a very important theological &#xD;
concept for him too.</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The impact of eschatological differences in Catholic and Lutheran traditions on modern understanding of God’s creation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/112901" />
    <author>
      <name>Kindiy, Oleh</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/112901</id>
    <updated>2023-10-26T10:12:10Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The impact of eschatological differences in Catholic and Lutheran traditions on modern understanding of God’s creation
Authors: Kindiy, Oleh
Abstract: In his book on the roots of secularisation of Western society, Charles &#xD;
Taylor singled out three main domains in which the category of God, &#xD;
once deeply rooted in the premodern period, lost its essential role. He &#xD;
spoke of the physical world that surrounded people, the social order, &#xD;
such as a kingdom, polis, and Church, and finally the “enchanted” &#xD;
world in its fullness.&#xD;
 He noted that in the year 1500 one could hardly &#xD;
imagine anyone who would not have faith in God; however, in 2000 &#xD;
many consider this not only a plausible alternative, but also, in many &#xD;
cases, an inevitable choice.</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

