<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/117281" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/117281</id>
  <updated>2026-04-11T11:33:30Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-11T11:33:30Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>State obligations towards asylum seekers in terms of article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/118583" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/118583</id>
    <updated>2024-02-15T06:33:14Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: State obligations towards asylum seekers in terms of article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Abstract: The number of migrants arriving within the European Union has never been as high as today, &#xD;
and 2015 was the apex year of migrant arrival. Moreover, of the arriving migrants, irregular &#xD;
migrants have the highest number, giving rise to an exploding rate of asylum applications and &#xD;
asylum-seekers. For this reason, this paper aim to explore what treatment in dealing with &#xD;
asylum-seekers engages State obligations under Article 3 of the European Convention.&#xD;
As the European Convention is a living instrument which has evolved and adapted through &#xD;
time, the paper aims to investigate the European Court of Human Rights' stand on the &#xD;
character, principles and evolutive doctrine of prohibition of torture and degrading and &#xD;
inhumane treatment (Article 3). State obligations were identified, i.e., procedural guarantee, &#xD;
protection against arbitrary detention and most importantly, obligations protecting against &#xD;
degrading treatments. Then implications regarding the identified obligations were conferred. &#xD;
Conclusively, recommendations on legislation to safeguard asylum-seekers rights and &#xD;
policies for societal integration were suggested.
Description: M.A. (Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>State obligations in international human rights law on human trafficking : case study Poland</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/118581" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/118581</id>
    <updated>2024-02-15T06:31:53Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: State obligations in international human rights law on human trafficking : case study Poland
Abstract: This thesis aims to investigate the compliance of international and national (EU) laws on &#xD;
human rights, with a specific focus on Poland, regarding the extent to which they meet the &#xD;
minimum standards for the elimination of human trafficking. The primary research question &#xD;
examines whether international and regional efforts in protecting victims of human &#xD;
trafficking were inadequate before the conflict in Ukraine? Furthermore, the hypothesis &#xD;
claims that following the conflict between Russia and Ukraine (2022) worsened the &#xD;
challenges, exposing shortcomings in state initiatives and responses that failed to adequately &#xD;
address the region's increased vulnerability of trafficking victims, as evidenced by an &#xD;
examination of international and European obligations, legal frameworks, and victim &#xD;
protection mechanisms. This research proposes a link between geopolitical events and the &#xD;
efficacy of victim protection measures. Victim protection measures include a variety of &#xD;
governmental, institutional, and assistance programs designed to protect those who have been &#xD;
the victims of human trafficking. In order to prevent and combat human trafficking, these &#xD;
actions may include, but are not limited to legal requirements, law enforcement initiatives, &#xD;
victim assistance programs, and regional or international agreements. To shed light on their &#xD;
efforts on preventing human trafficking in Poland, we will analyze how geopolitical events, &#xD;
such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, have affected the efficiency of these victim &#xD;
protection measures.&#xD;
My research focuses on Poland because they have received the most refugees after the &#xD;
conflict between Ukraine and Russia, providing a good testing ground, due to Poland's dual &#xD;
role as a transit zone, coupled with pre-existing challenges in victim protection and human &#xD;
trafficking, has implications for its ability to safeguard trafficking victims and uphold &#xD;
international obligations. Despite the surge in vulnerable populations, the State's capacity to &#xD;
ensure safety and uphold international obligations regarding victim protection remains a &#xD;
critical concern, necessitating an in-depth examination of the State's responses and adherence &#xD;
to established human rights standards.
Description: M.A. (Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Does life imprisonment without the possibility of parole breach article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights? : a comparative analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/118576" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/118576</id>
    <updated>2024-02-15T06:29:37Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Does life imprisonment without the possibility of parole breach article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights? : a comparative analysis
Abstract: States are given the liberty to impose criminal measures as they deem fit when a &#xD;
particular crime has been committed, with the greater the severity of the crime, the &#xD;
greater the criminal measure imposed. Life imprisonment is typically reserved for the &#xD;
most heinous crimes and is the most severe form of punishment in most statute books &#xD;
in the European Continent. This Academic writing will analyse the historical justification, &#xD;
in terms of penological goals, behind the imposition of such a measure and determine&#xD;
the historical rationale why such a sanction became widely used throughout Europe. &#xD;
Another objective of this academic writing is determining the stance held by the &#xD;
European Court of Human Rights concerning the imposition of a life sentence without &#xD;
any possibility of the inmate being afforded release and whether such can be deemed to &#xD;
be inherently undignified to constitute inhuman and degrading treatment in terms of &#xD;
Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. &#xD;
The legislation and jurisprudence of various European countries will be analysed to &#xD;
determine if they adhere to the principles and findings of the European Court of Human &#xD;
Rights. Jurisdictions wherein life imprisonment has been abolished, will also be &#xD;
examined to understand the ra8onale behind such an abolition. The author will conclude &#xD;
this academic writing by answering the question posed: whether Life Imprisonment &#xD;
Without the Possibility of Parole Breach Article 3 of the European Convention on Human &#xD;
Rights. The author will then give his opinion on whether the European Countries which &#xD;
have been scrutinised adhere to the principles of the European Court of Human Rights, &#xD;
and suggestions be made on what measures the respective legislators should take to &#xD;
address any deficiencies.
Description: M.A. (Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>To what extent does the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence tarnish the element of fairness in one’s rights under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/118572" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/118572</id>
    <updated>2024-02-15T06:28:21Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: To what extent does the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence tarnish the element of fairness in one’s rights under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights?
Abstract: Title 1 of Part 1 of Book Second of the Maltese Criminal Code inter alia establishes the &#xD;
procedures upon which the Police must follow when conducting searches, taking samples and &#xD;
performing arrests. Such provisions were put in place in order to ensure that the Police are not allowed &#xD;
to conduct their investigations in a haphazard and irregular manner to the detriment of everyone &#xD;
involved, including the suspects, victims and society as a whole. However, the effectiveness of these &#xD;
provisions is somewhat limited due to Article 349(2) which states that : the omission of any precaution, &#xD;
formality or requirement prescribed under this Title shall be no bar to proving, at the trial, in any &#xD;
manner allowed by law, the facts to which such precaution, formality or requirement relates.&#xD;
The aforementioned provision prima facie renders a significant portion of the Title to which it &#xD;
relates ineffective, bestowing clear disadvantages for the accused at trial, in situations where the &#xD;
Police would have collected a piece of evidence in an irregular manner contrary to the applicable &#xD;
provisions of the Criminal Code. In this regard, this dissertation shall delve into the hypotheses of &#xD;
whether the provisions of Article 349(2) operate to such an extent that they serve to obstruct the &#xD;
victim’s right to a fair trial under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.&#xD;
This Dissertation shall initially delve into the history behind the admissibility rule of illegally &#xD;
obtained evidence, as developed through English law and jurisprudence, as the latter has had a strong &#xD;
influence on the manner in which the rule has been applied by the Maltese Courts. In contrast, this &#xD;
dissertation shall also cover the basic concepts behind the inadmissibility rule and forbidden fruit &#xD;
theory as adopted by the American judicial system. Upon establishing the manner in which both rules &#xD;
were developed and subsequently applied, Chapter 3 focusses on the legal and jurisprudential &#xD;
development of the Maltese position, vis-à-vis the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence, and &#xD;
highlights the influence that the above-mentioned rules have had on Maltese jurisprudence at &#xD;
different points in time. &#xD;
Subsequently, Chapter 4 of this Dissertation discusses the position of the European Court of &#xD;
Human Rights pertaining to the aforementioned hypothesis through the analysis of the Court’s &#xD;
interpretation and application of the element of ‘fairness’ with regards to Article 6 of the Convention. &#xD;
Through this exercise, the impact of the European Court of Human Rights on the development of &#xD;
Maltese law and judgements may be appreciated and the conclusion to the research question &#xD;
achieved.
Description: M.A. (Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

