<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/131550" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/131550</id>
  <updated>2026-05-27T18:25:19Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-05-27T18:25:19Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Evolving protections in collective redundancies : analysing recent ECJ decisions and their impact on employers, employees, and trade unions in EU labour law</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146608" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146608</id>
    <updated>2026-05-20T13:17:32Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Evolving protections in collective redundancies : analysing recent ECJ decisions and their impact on employers, employees, and trade unions in EU labour law
Abstract: The Collective Redundancies Directive (98/59/EC) remains a central instrument of &#xD;
European labour law, balancing the employer’s freedom to restructure with the &#xD;
protection of employees against the consequences of large-scale dismissals. This &#xD;
dissertation analyses how the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has shaped &#xD;
the Directive through its jurisprudence and examines the resulting impact on national &#xD;
legal systems, with Germany and Malta serving as case studies. &#xD;
The study demonstrates that the CJEU has expanded the Directive’s scope and clarified &#xD;
key concepts such as “worker”, “dismissal”, “establishment” and “controlling &#xD;
undertaking”. Landmark rulings including Junk v Kühnel, Balkaya, Bichat, AEK, Resorts &#xD;
Mallorca and MO v SM illustrate the Court’s role in strengthening procedural safeguards &#xD;
and reinforcing consultation obligations. While these judgments promote uniform &#xD;
protection, they also create tensions for employers, particularly in jurisdictions where &#xD;
national traditions diverge from the Court’s interpretation. &#xD;
The comparative analysis reveals significant differences in implementation. German law &#xD;
provides strong worker protection but generates uncertainty and litigation risks through &#xD;
its complex procedures and strict sanctions. Maltese law, by contrast, offers efficiency &#xD;
and predictability, though often at the expense of meaningful worker participation. &#xD;
These findings highlight the Directive’s partial harmonisation and the continuing &#xD;
variation in worker protection across Member States. &#xD;
The dissertation concludes that reform is necessary to ensure clarity, proportionality, &#xD;
and effectiveness. Recommendations include harmonising sanctions, clarifying &#xD;
definitions, enhancing consultation rights, and addressing challenges posed by &#xD;
digitalisation, platform work, and cross-border restructurings. Future research should &#xD;
explore the role of European Works Councils, the impact of algorithmic management, &#xD;
and protections for non-standard workers. The Directive, while pioneering, requires &#xD;
recalibration to remain fit for today’s labour markets and to maintain a fair balance &#xD;
between flexibility for employers and protection for workers.
Description: LL.M.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The role of virtual asset service providers in money laundering : a comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in Turkey and the EU</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146606" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146606</id>
    <updated>2026-05-20T13:14:45Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The role of virtual asset service providers in money laundering : a comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in Turkey and the EU
Abstract: The rise of crypto-assets has transformed the global financial landscape, creating both &#xD;
opportunities for innovation and risks to financial integrity. As exchanges, custodians, and &#xD;
other intermediaries emerged to facilitate the trading, storage, and transfer of these assets, &#xD;
regulators confronted the challenge of extending anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist &#xD;
financing frameworks to an industry defined by anonymity, borderless transactions, and rapid &#xD;
technological change. &#xD;
This dissertation will examine the legal regimes that govern CASPs in their role as &#xD;
intermediaries within the crypto-asset ecosystem. The European Union operationalized these &#xD;
standards through successive directives and, more recently, through directly applicable &#xD;
regulations such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation and the Transfer of Funds &#xD;
Regulation. Türkiye, under pressure from its FATF grey-listing, incorporated CASPs into its AML &#xD;
legislation, strengthened sanctions compliance, and ultimately embedded them within capital &#xD;
markets law, backed by detailed MASAK notices and Capital Markets Board Regulations.  &#xD;
After comprehensively evaluating the legal frameworks any gaps or shortcomings will be &#xD;
addressed and their potential impact and real world applications will be provided.  One of &#xD;
which is the current exclusion of decentralized exchanges which if stays unregulated could &#xD;
have catastrophic adverse effects just as the previous FTX crisis.
Description: LL.M.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A new ‘green’ era for the EU : what role for competition law?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146604" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146604</id>
    <updated>2026-05-20T13:11:29Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A new ‘green’ era for the EU : what role for competition law?
Abstract: This dissertation explores the intersection of EU competition law and sustainability, &#xD;
asking whether the current framework can coherently integrate environmental &#xD;
objectives without undermining legal certainty, consistency, and effective enforcement. &#xD;
It focuses on the structural tension between competition law’s traditional price-centred &#xD;
objectives and EU’s constitutional commitment to sustainability. The dissertation is &#xD;
centred around competition law’s three pillars, and analyses how sustainability &#xD;
agreements are treated under the more flexible Article 101 TFEU and EU Merger &#xD;
Regulation, and the rigid Article 102 TFEU. The study moreover identifies enforcement &#xD;
inconsistencies, focusing on the progressive Dutch ACM, the radical Austria and the &#xD;
more cautious Bundeskartellamt, alongside a comparative analysis of the more &#xD;
progressive UK CMA. It reviews academic sources to highlight concerns about &#xD;
fragmented enforcement and the lack of consistent legal methodology. The findings &#xD;
underline the limits of the current framework in accommodating sustainability and point &#xD;
to the need for reinterpretation or reform to ensure coherence between competition &#xD;
law and EU’s wider constitutional objectives.
Description: LL.M.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The reconciliation of conflicting human rights before courts having criminal jurisdiction</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/140679" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/140679</id>
    <updated>2025-10-28T14:28:57Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The reconciliation of conflicting human rights before courts having criminal jurisdiction
Abstract: This study deals with some conflicts which arise during the pendency of criminal proceedings. &#xD;
The object which is the subject of such conflict is a right protected by law. The study considers &#xD;
conflicts arising between human rights belonging to stakeholders pendente lite, meaning &#xD;
throughout criminal proceedings, i.e. as stated in the title of the dissertation ‘before Courts&#xD;
having criminal jurisdiction’. Such conflicts are detected in this study, after which the author &#xD;
proposes methods to attempt to reconcile such conflicts in a manner which upholds the &#xD;
respect for fundamental rights of the stakeholders, be they victims, witnesses, or the accused.&#xD;
The dissertation deals with some facets of the right to a fair trial, all of which are revealed in &#xD;
the following research questions:&#xD;
I. Can the right to a public hearing be restricted?&#xD;
II. Can the presumption of innocence of the accused be breached by prejudicial pre-trial &#xD;
publicity?&#xD;
III. Can rights of victims be prejudiced by the judicial admission of crimes for the purposes &#xD;
of the obtainment of plea-bargains?&#xD;
The author suggests that Article 517 of the Criminal Code be re-drafted by inserting the words &#xD;
‘or of the complainant or any witness’ after the words ‘or of the party charged or accused’. &#xD;
Article 391 of the Criminal Code fails to mention specific requirements which the prosecution &#xD;
must prove to secure witness protection and anonymity. The author proposes that certain &#xD;
requirements be explicitly included in Maltese Law. The author heavily criticized the half-baked        parliamentary measure to the effect that only drug trafficking cases were spared the &#xD;
applicability of the proviso to Article 436(6) of the Criminal Code by virtue of clause 3 to Act &#xD;
VII of 2025 which came into effect on 17 March 2025. No change has been effected in so far &#xD;
as the crime of willful homicide is concerned.
Description: LL.B.(Hons)(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

