<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/133705" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/133705</id>
  <updated>2026-04-12T09:47:18Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-12T09:47:18Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Investigating the role of ultrasound assessment of cervical lenght in asymptomatic women at anomaly scan in Malta</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145382" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145382</id>
    <updated>2026-04-07T13:25:24Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Investigating the role of ultrasound assessment of cervical lenght in asymptomatic women at anomaly scan in Malta
Abstract: Purpose:  Preterm birth is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Although &#xD;
cervical shortening is considered an indicative factor for preterm birth, several aspects &#xD;
about cervical length measurement remain controversial.  &#xD;
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess cervical length in asymptomatic &#xD;
pregnant women at anomaly scan; compare transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound &#xD;
assessment; identify any relationship between demographic or clinical characteristics; &#xD;
cervical length or gestation at delivery; and establish a cut-off for cervical length.  &#xD;
Methodology: A quantitative, non-experimental, prospective study design was adopted. &#xD;
The cervical length of 79 asymptomatic women was assessed between 19- and 24&#xD;
weeks’ gestation, using transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound. Statistical analyses &#xD;
examined correlations between demographic and clinical characteristics, cervical length, &#xD;
and gestation at delivery.  &#xD;
Results: Transabdominal and transvaginal cervical length measurements showed a &#xD;
strong positive correlation (p &lt;.001), with no statistically significant difference in mean &#xD;
values (1.19 mm, p = 0.214). Transvaginal cervical length was significantly associated &#xD;
with race-ethnicity, smoking status, termination of pregnancy, uterine anomalies, and &#xD;
mode and gestation at previous delivery. For spontaneous onset deliveries, gestation at &#xD;
delivery was significantly associated with BMI, and previous obstetric complications. &#xD;
For iatrogenic onset deliveries, gestation at delivery was significantly associated with &#xD;
race-ethnicity, smoking status, parity, uterine anomalies, age, and previous obstetric &#xD;
complications. The gestation at delivery was positively correlated with both &#xD;
transabdominal (p = .022) and transvaginal (p = .005) cervical length measurements.  &#xD;
Conclusions: Cervical length assessment during the anomaly scan, using the &#xD;
transabdominal approach, may help identify low-risk women at increased risk of preterm &#xD;
birth, especially among Asian women or women who stopped smoking in pregnancy. &#xD;
Targeted cervical length screening may be considered in these women, pending cost&#xD;
benefit analysis. Further research with larger samples is recommended, particularly in &#xD;
women with prior termination of pregnancy or uterine anomalies.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A qualitative analysis of the experience of women who receive a false-positive result at the National Breast Screening Unit</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/133822" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/133822</id>
    <updated>2025-04-03T08:24:48Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A qualitative analysis of the experience of women who receive a false-positive result at the National Breast Screening Unit
Abstract: Background: Women's experiences during breast screening appointments significantly influence their future participation. This study explores the impacts of false-positive results on the overall experience of women attending further investigation clinics in the Malta National Breast Screening Unit (MNBSU). Objectives: The objectives were to examine the effects of false-positive results on women’s emotional experiences and their willingness to re-attend future screenings, to assess the differences if any between non-invasive and invasive follow-up procedures, to evaluate perceptions of the screening programme, and to identify strategies to support women during these experiences. Study Design and Approach: A qualitative exploratory approach was adopted to address a gap in local research. Women aged 50–69 who attended further investigation clinics at the MNSBU and received a false positive result were invited to participate. Open-ended semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 consenting participants, and in-depth data was collected. Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify, analyse, and interpret patterns and emerging themes within the data collected, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of participants' experiences. Findings: The findings revealed that further investigation often caused anxiety, fear, and overwhelming emotions, particularly among women undergoing invasive procedures. Despite these challenges, participants expressed relief upon receiving normal outcomes and maintained a positive perception of the screening programme, appreciating its thoroughness and role in early detection. Participant recommendations highlighted the need for faster reporting and results systems, enhanced emotional support during stressful periods, and improved communication to alleviate distress during follow-up assessments. Conclusion and Recommendations: Recommendations for future research and clinical practice; emphasise the need for larger sample sizes, longitudinal studies, and evaluations of support mechanisms to enhance the breast screening experience. Insights into factors influencing re-attendance and long-term psychological effects are also proposed to further improve patient-centred care in breast screening programmes.
Description: M.Sc. Radiography(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Investigating fetal growth restriction due to placental insufficiency in the 35–40 age group</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/133821" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/133821</id>
    <updated>2025-04-03T08:22:53Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Investigating fetal growth restriction due to placental insufficiency in the 35–40 age group
Abstract: Purpose: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) due to placental insufficiency is a growing concern,&#xD;
particularly in women of advanced maternal age. With the global trend toward delayed&#xD;
childbearing, it is important to evaluate whether routine screening methods such as&#xD;
umbilical artery Doppler (UAD) should be introduced in this population.&#xD;
Objectives: The study aimed to assess whether UAD measurements can identify FGR risk in&#xD;
women aged 35–40 years; compare UA blood flow parameters between FGR-affected and&#xD;
unaffected pregnancies in this age group; and determine if sociodemographic and obstetric&#xD;
factors influence fetal blood flow.&#xD;
Methodology: A quantitative, prospective, quasi-experimental design was employed,&#xD;
recruiting 198 pregnant women aged 35–40 years in their third trimester from a public&#xD;
general hospital in Malta. Each participant underwent a UAD and fetal biometry scan. A&#xD;
control group of 16 high-risk FGR participants was included for comparison. Participants&#xD;
completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics and medical history.&#xD;
Statistical analyses were performed to compare fetal growth parameters between groups.&#xD;
Results: The study revealed statistically significant higher mean pulsatility index, resistance&#xD;
index, and systolic/diastolic ratios in the control group, indicating increased placental&#xD;
insufficiency (p&lt;0.001) in FGR-affected fetuses. Conversely, mean fetal biometrics, including&#xD;
head circumference, abdominal circumference, and estimated fetal weight (EFW) % were&#xD;
significantly higher in the experimental study group (p&lt;0.001). Ethnic differences were&#xD;
observed, with white participants having a higher EFW% compared to other groups&#xD;
(p=0.029). Parity and smoking were the only characteristics that were statistically&#xD;
significantly associated with fetal growth parameters.&#xD;
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that UAD indices were significantly higher in FGRaffected pregnancies in women aged 35–40 years. Although no correlation with maternal&#xD;
age was found, further research should investigate routine Doppler use, personalised&#xD;
monitoring, standardised US techniques, and tailored prenatal care to further explore&#xD;
whether it’s possible to improve detection and management of FGR in this age group.
Description: M.Sc. Radiography(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

