<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/143185" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/143185</id>
  <updated>2026-04-15T21:06:13Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-15T21:06:13Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>AML enforcement vs. constitutional rights in Malta : a comparative analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/143463" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/143463</id>
    <updated>2026-02-05T08:10:38Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: AML enforcement vs. constitutional rights in Malta : a comparative analysis
Abstract: This dissertation explores the constitutionality of administrative fines imposed by the FIAU under Article 13 of the PMLA, examining whether the current enforcement system aligns with Malta’s constitutional guarantees of due process, fairness, and the separation of powers. It also addresses the increasing legal debate about the FIAU’s dual function as both investigator and adjudicator and whether this concentration of authority violates the principles of impartiality and independent judicial protection outlined in the Maltese Constitution. Through a doctrinal and comparative approach, the dissertation analyses relevant statutory provisions, constitutional case law, and academic commentary, while comparing Malta’s framework with those adopted in the United Kingdom, Italy, and Liechtenstein. It considers the availability of appeal mechanisms, the independence of decision-making bodies, and the degree of judicial scrutiny afforded to administrative sanctions. The research reveals that while administrative enforcement offers flexibility and efficiency in addressing financial misconduct, it poses potential risks to constitutional rights when not accompanied by adequate procedural protections. While aiming for reasonable policy goals, the Maltese system has some worrying issues. This is due to the lack of a clear division between investigation and decision-making, the narrow range of judicial review, and unclear rules about whether the penalties are fair. The dissertation concludes that legislative clarification and procedural reform are necessary to strengthen accountability, ensure fairness, and enhance compliance with constitutional and European human rights standards. It proposes the establishment of a more independent review mechanism, clearer criteria for fine determination, and a more transparent appeals process. These reforms would preserve the effectiveness of the antimoney laundering framework while restoring full constitutional compatibility and public confidence in the FIAU’s enforcement process.
Description: M.A. Fin. Serv.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sustainable finance disclosure regulation : an analysis of the impact on the Maltese financial sector</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/143461" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/143461</id>
    <updated>2026-02-05T07:56:26Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Sustainable finance disclosure regulation : an analysis of the impact on the Maltese financial sector
Abstract: The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) marks a crucial milestone in the European Union’s efforts to integrate sustainability into its financial markets, significantly affecting Member States (MSs), including Malta’s financial services sector. As a small but internationally oriented European Union member state, Malta presents a distinctive environment to explore the effects of this regulation. This dissertation examines the influence of the SFDR on regulatory adherence, investor behaviour, risk management approaches, and institutional strategies within financial service providers in Malta, while also shedding a spotlight on the challenges the implementation has created. The research employs a qualitative methodology, analysing EU regulatory frameworks and existing literature. Results indicate that the SFDR improves transparency and builds investor confidence by harmonising sustainability reporting, with the classification of investment funds under Articles 8 and 9 offering clearer distinctions of sustainability goals. Nonetheless, the categorisation process encounters issues due to ambiguous definitions, leading to difficulties in classification and potential misrepresentation. Moreover, the regulation pushes firms to embed Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors into their risk management systems and promotes enhanced collaboration between compliance, investment, and reporting departments. Despite these benefits, Maltese financial institutions confront noteworthy hurdles, including the difficulty and vagueness of SFDR directives, the lack of unified metrics, and the high costs associated with compliance. Smaller MSs are particularly vulnerable due to their limited resources for comprehensive data gathering and reporting. However, by aligning Malta’s financial sector with global sustainability standards, the SFDR strengthens the nation’s competitiveness and stature as a hub for sustainable finance. In summary, this dissertation sheds light on the balance between the challenges posed by regulation and the growth opportunities it creates, demonstrating how the SFDR encourages greater accountability and innovation in Malta’s developing financial landscape.
Description: M.A. Fin. Serv.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The determinants of a successful venture capital market : analysing economic, stock and bond market influences in the US and EU</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/143459" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/143459</id>
    <updated>2026-02-05T07:39:26Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The determinants of a successful venture capital market : analysing economic, stock and bond market influences in the US and EU
Abstract: This study investigates the macroeconomic determinants of Venture Capital (VC) inflows in the United States and the European Union over the period 2007Q1–2023Q4. Employing a quantitative, longitudinal, and comparative econometric approach, the research utilizes Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression models with Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent (HAC) standard errors. The empirical analysis reveals distinct dynamics between the two ecosystems. In the US, results align with classical economic theory, where VC inflows are pro-cyclical and integrated with the real economy, demonstrating significant relationships with GDP and stock market performance. Conversely, the EU market appears insulated from real-economy indicators, with GDP and stock market performance found to be statistically insignificant, validating concerns regarding structural fragmentation raised in the Draghi (2024) report. Despite these divergences, bond market performance consistently emerges as a significant negative determinant across both regions, supporting supply-side theory, while inflation demonstrates a positive influence, particularly post-2014. The findings underscore that while the US market remains dynamic, the EU requires deep structural integration to connect capital to its innovative potential.
Description: M.A.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

