<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145212" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145212</id>
  <updated>2026-06-19T08:16:11Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-19T08:16:11Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Dissonances between policy framework and customary practice in gender equality of small island developing states : the case of LGBTQI+ rights in Mauritius</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146104" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146104</id>
    <updated>2026-05-04T11:48:11Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Dissonances between policy framework and customary practice in gender equality of small island developing states : the case of LGBTQI+ rights in Mauritius
Abstract: Despite growing international recognition of LGBTQI+ rights, Small Island Developing States &#xD;
(SIDS) continue to face challenges in translating formal legal commitments into substantive &#xD;
equality. This dissertation examines the dissonance between State-level legal and policy &#xD;
frameworks and entrenched normative practices shaping the lived experiences of LGBTQI+ &#xD;
individuals in Mauritius. Although Mauritius has ratified key international human rights &#xD;
instruments and experienced progressive judicial developments, these advances remain &#xD;
unevenly realised due to persistent socio-cultural, religious, and institutional barriers. &#xD;
Employing a qualitative research design, the study integrates legal and policy analysis with &#xD;
semi-structured interviews conducted with LGBTQI+ individuals to assess the alignment &#xD;
between legal commitments and lived realities. The findings reveal that, notwithstanding &#xD;
constitutional guarantees, international obligations, and limited anti-discrimination &#xD;
protections, LGBTQI+ persons in Mauritius continue to face marginalisation in healthcare, &#xD;
employment, family life, and access to justice. These exclusions are sustained not by formal &#xD;
customary law, but by deeply embedded normative practices, heteronormative social &#xD;
structures, religious conservatism, and weak institutional accountability within a small island &#xD;
context characterised by dense social networks and limited anonymity. &#xD;
Grounded in the theoretical frameworks of intersectionality and legal pluralism, the &#xD;
dissertation argues that legal reform alone is insufficient to achieve substantive equality in &#xD;
SIDS. Instead, meaningful change requires shifts in social norms, strengthened institutional &#xD;
responsiveness, and inclusive policymaking that centres marginalised LGBTQI+ voices. The &#xD;
study concludes with context-specific recommendations to bridge the persistent gap between &#xD;
policy and practice relating to LGBTQI+ rights in Mauritius.
Description: M.A.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

