<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147609" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147609</id>
  <updated>2026-07-08T02:16:07Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-08T02:16:07Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Postcolonial Directions in Education : volume 15 : issue 1</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147664" />
    <author>
      <name>Borg, Carmel</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Bonello, Charmaine</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Thapliyal, Nisha</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147664</id>
    <updated>2026-06-24T10:03:37Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Postcolonial Directions in Education : volume 15 : issue 1
Authors: Borg, Carmel; Bonello, Charmaine; Thapliyal, Nisha
Abstract: Internalised hegemonies : how Algerian academics perceive the “scientific-ness” of Arabic, French, and English. A mixed-methods study of linguistic coloniality in postcolonial higher education: Youcef J-T. Zidane; Federici’s and Robinson’s critiques of capitalism : thinking decolonising higher education in Uganda: Samuel Nyende; Buddhist criticism as a tool of decolonization : the evolution of Bhabha’s hybridity theory in contemporary Vietnamese literature: Nguyen Thanh Trung; Narratives of exile and belonging : a comparative ecocritical and postcolonial reading of Abdulrazak Gurnah and Leila Aboulela’s fiction: A. Haseena Bai and Subrahmania pillai; Indigenous knowledge versus Western science : redefining epistemic authority in museums: Maggie Selman</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Internalised hegemonies : how Algerian academics perceive the “scientific-ness” of Arabic, French, and English. A mixed-methods study of linguistic coloniality in postcolonial higher education</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147657" />
    <author>
      <name>Zidane, Youcef J-T.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147657</id>
    <updated>2026-06-24T10:21:36Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Internalised hegemonies : how Algerian academics perceive the “scientific-ness” of Arabic, French, and English. A mixed-methods study of linguistic coloniality in postcolonial higher education
Authors: Zidane, Youcef J-T.
Abstract: This paper examines how six decades after political independence; Algerian&#xD;
academics continue to internalise and reproduce colonial hierarchies of&#xD;
linguistic legitimacy within higher education. Drawing on mixed-methods data&#xD;
from 442 researchers across disciplines and three generations, the study&#xD;
reveals a profound paradox: Arabic commands the highest proficiency (mean&#xD;
4.82/6) yet accounts for only 4% of academic publications, not primarily due&#xD;
to external barriers, however, because researchers themselves have&#xD;
internalised the belief that Arabic is “not a scientific language.” The paper&#xD;
identifies three dimensions of internalised linguistic hierarchy: epistemic&#xD;
disqualification (Arabic seen as incapable of expressing scientific concepts),&#xD;
linguistic self-surveillance (researchers policing their own language choices),&#xD;
and generational transmission (younger academics more fully accepting&#xD;
English dominance). Quantitative analysis shows that even among&#xD;
researchers with equivalent Arabic proficiency, those who internalise negative&#xD;
views publish significantly less in Arabic and report higher rates of manuscript&#xD;
abandonment. Generational analysis reveals that while the post-2000 cohort pragmatically accepts English dominance (58.2% state “English is the&#xD;
language of science”), they simultaneously express the weakest attachments&#xD;
to Arabic as a scientific language (40.4% devalue Arabic’s scientific capacity),&#xD;
suggesting that internalised coloniality is not diminishing, on the other hand&#xD;
merely transferring from French to English. The paper argues that genuine&#xD;
decolonisation of higher education requires not merely replacing French with&#xD;
English; instead, actively deconstructing the internalised beliefs about which&#xD;
languages can legitimately produce knowledge. Findings contribute to&#xD;
understanding how colonial power operates through the production of&#xD;
consent, the internalisation of hegemonic standards by the colonised&#xD;
themselves, and how these standards are reproduced through educational&#xD;
institutions, curriculum, and academic evaluation systems.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Federici’s and Robinson’s critiques of capitalism : thinking decolonising higher education in Uganda</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147661" />
    <author>
      <name>Nyende, Samuel</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147661</id>
    <updated>2026-06-24T09:46:10Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Federici’s and Robinson’s critiques of capitalism : thinking decolonising higher education in Uganda
Authors: Nyende, Samuel
Abstract: In this paper, I engage with Silvia Federici’s and Cedric J. Robinson’s critiques&#xD;
of capitalism to explore their relevance for thinking about the decolonisation&#xD;
of higher education in Uganda. I argue that understanding the continuing&#xD;
subordination and exploitation experienced by many participants in higher&#xD;
education requires close attention to the broader socio-economic, political,&#xD;
and culturally mediated inequalities within which higher education is&#xD;
embedded. Grounded in a critical analysis of capitalism, the paper identifies&#xD;
the sources, effects, and subjects of exclusion and discrimination, while also&#xD;
illuminating potential avenues for transformation. It demonstrates that, from&#xD;
its inception under colonial rule in Uganda, higher education has been deeply&#xD;
exclusionary and elitist. The paper further places Federici’s and Robinson’s&#xD;
critiques of capitalism in dialogue with one another and connects these&#xD;
insights to the Ugandan higher education context. Ultimately, the paper&#xD;
underscores the necessity of theorising and practising from the standpoint of&#xD;
the exploited and oppressed, valorising multiple epistemic referents, and&#xD;
fostering collective resistance to the elitist and market-driven structures&#xD;
governing access to higher education. In doing so, it calls for renewed political&#xD;
struggle to compel the state to socialise and democratise access to higher&#xD;
education in Uganda.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Buddhist criticism as a tool of decolonization : the evolution of Bhabha’s hybridity theory in contemporary Vietnamese literature</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147643" />
    <author>
      <name>Thanh Trung, Nguyen</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147643</id>
    <updated>2026-06-24T07:28:09Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Buddhist criticism as a tool of decolonization : the evolution of Bhabha’s hybridity theory in contemporary Vietnamese literature
Authors: Thanh Trung, Nguyen
Abstract: This article reimagines Homi Bhabha's hybridity theory through the lens of&#xD;
Buddhist criticism, arguing that Mahāyāna concepts of impermanence, nonself,&#xD;
and nirvana transform postcolonial anxiety into spiritual liberation.&#xD;
Through close readings of Apocalypse Hotel (Ho Anh Thai) and The River&#xD;
(Nguyen Ngoc Tu), the study reveals a transformation from postcolonial&#xD;
anxiety to spiritual liberation. The Third Space becomes a ‘space of&#xD;
impermanence,’ the Hybrid Subject evolves into a ‘non-self-hybrid,’ and&#xD;
Mimicry transforms into ‘radical imitation.’ Using integrative intertextuality,&#xD;
discourse analysis, and deconstructive reading, the article argues that&#xD;
Buddhism not only expands but also decenters Bhabha’s theory, forming an&#xD;
East Asian–inflected model of postcolonial literary criticism.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

