<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147720" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147720</id>
  <updated>2026-08-07T08:30:24Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-07T08:30:24Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Discovering new dimensions of catholicity and ecumenism</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147878" />
    <author>
      <name>Halík, Tomáš</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147878</id>
    <updated>2026-07-08T05:53:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Discovering new dimensions of catholicity and ecumenism
Authors: Halík, Tomáš
Abstract: The Second Vatican Council was a fundamental step in the shift &#xD;
from Catholicism to Catholicity, to an ecumenical universal &#xD;
openness to which the Church is summoned and which is one of the &#xD;
important signs of its authenticity. What I call “Catholicism” is the &#xD;
form of Church and theology that was created as a counterculture &#xD;
first vis-à-vis Protestantism and later vis-à-vis the Enlightenment, &#xD;
secular humanism, and secular political ideologies. At the &#xD;
Second Vatican Council, three major overtures in the direction of &#xD;
ecumenism emerged from the besieged fortress of “Catholicism”: &#xD;
dialogue with the non-Catholic Christian Churches, with non&#xD;
Christian religions, and with secular culture, including atheistic &#xD;
humanism.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Polarization and globalization of Catholicism : understanding the pontificate of Francis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147875" />
    <author>
      <name>Faggioli, Massimo</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147875</id>
    <updated>2026-07-07T11:08:56Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Polarization and globalization of Catholicism : understanding the pontificate of Francis
Authors: Faggioli, Massimo
Abstract: The crisis of globalization has also affected the globalization of &#xD;
Catholicism, and internal polarization within the Church has &#xD;
become evident. Intra-ecclesial polarization is an important &#xD;
issue because the problem of divisions in the Church has taken &#xD;
on a new form, not only in terms of visibility due to the radical &#xD;
democratisation made possible by social media and new Catholic &#xD;
media independent of functional and institutional dependence &#xD;
on ecclesiastical hierarchies, but also in nature. It is found both &#xD;
among the clergy (up to the level of bishops and cardinals) and &#xD;
among the laity; among practicing and believing Catholics, as &#xD;
well as among Catholics for whom a certain type of positioning &#xD;
and religious identity is an integral part of their profession &#xD;
or vocation/ministry in the Church (politicians, journalists, &#xD;
intellectuals, teachers, lay ministers with local or national public &#xD;
recognition). This is a polarization that originates from the search &#xD;
for a particular and idiosyncratic profile, in opposition to other &#xD;
profiles, including that of the average Catholic, and that originates &#xD;
from different factors. The following is only a provisional and &#xD;
incomplete list. [extract]</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>“But the word of god is not bound” (2 Tim 2,9) : reflections on the significance of the canons of scripture of different faith communities</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147873" />
    <author>
      <name>Attard, Stefan M.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147873</id>
    <updated>2026-07-07T10:57:24Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: “But the word of god is not bound” (2 Tim 2,9) : reflections on the significance of the canons of scripture of different faith communities
Authors: Attard, Stefan M.
Abstract: The annual seminario biblico organised by the Pontifical Biblical &#xD;
Institute in Rome in 2023 dealt with what has been termed “lower &#xD;
criticism”, more often referred to as textual criticism. This study &#xD;
involves the laborious and painstaking analysis of the extant &#xD;
manuscripts of the Old and New Testaments in order to establish the &#xD;
relationships between them, and to ascertain their respective degree &#xD;
of originality and value. Such an analysis cannot but have a bearing &#xD;
on our evaluation of different canons embraced by different faith &#xD;
communities. This evaluation depends, not so much on which of &#xD;
the manuscripts are most faithful to the original version, but rather &#xD;
on which books have been accepted in their entirety as Scripture. [extract]</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Opinions and their theological value : some observations from norm theory</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147871" />
    <author>
      <name>Hahn, Judith</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147871</id>
    <updated>2026-07-07T10:47:38Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Opinions and their theological value : some observations from norm theory
Authors: Hahn, Judith
Abstract: One key aspect of the discussions about what the Church will be &#xD;
required to learn in the coming years is the relevance that facts have &#xD;
for norms. As scholars we are constantly reminded that facts are not &#xD;
normative and should not be confused with norms. However, we &#xD;
often wonder how the two relate to one another. This relationship &#xD;
is actually fairly difficult to determine; my approach follows &#xD;
legal scholar Christoph Möllers’s norm theory, which Möllers &#xD;
presented comprehensively in his 2015 monograph Die Möglichkeit &#xD;
der Normen. The chief motivation behind my choice of theory is &#xD;
that Möllers’s approach can be directly related to ecclesiology, as I &#xD;
will show later in my study. My article begins by briefly outlining &#xD;
his approach to understanding norms in relation to facts as a &#xD;
relationship of essential distance and intimate proximity. I then &#xD;
apply his theory to ecclesiology to explain how we can employ norm &#xD;
theory to differentiate between the earthly Church as fact and the &#xD;
heavenly Church as norm, and determine their relationship as &#xD;
being at one and the same time indivisible and unconfused. [extract]</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

