<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Community: Journal of the Faculty of Theology</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15064" />
  <subtitle>Journal of the Faculty of Theology</subtitle>
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15064</id>
  <updated>2026-04-19T04:57:41Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-19T04:57:41Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Melita Theologica : volume 75 : issue 1 : 2025</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138124" />
    <author>
      <name>Micallef, Martin</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Mangion, Claude</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138124</id>
    <updated>2025-08-18T07:36:46Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Melita Theologica : volume 75 : issue 1 : 2025
Authors: Micallef, Martin; Mangion, Claude
Abstract: Table of contents:; 1. Claude Mangion: Editorial Note; 2. Graham Harman: The True Flaw in the Ontological Proof: Anselm, Kant, Husserl; 3. Kevin Hart: The Problem of Evil; 4. Steven Shakespeare: The Logic of Expression in the Philosophy of Religion: Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty; 5. Mark Sultana: On Taking the ‘Five Ways’ Seriously as Ways; 6. Robert Farrugia: “Apart From Me You Can Do Nothing”: The Phenomenological Unity Between Affectivity, Truth, and Action; 7. Michael Grech: Giovanni Franzoni’s Non-Teleological Interpretation of the Kingdom of God and Jean-François Lyotard’s Critique of Grand Narratives; 8. Keith Pisani: Are Religious and Non-Religious Justifications of Coercive Laws Qualitatively Different?; 9. François Zammit: The Theological Thinking in Lippmann’s and Hayek’s Justification of the Market Order; 10. Stefan M. Attard: The Relevance of Biblical Archaeology to Biblical Scholarship; 11. Guidelines For Contributors</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Editorial note [Melita Theologica, 75(1)]</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138123" />
    <author>
      <name>Mangion, Claude</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138123</id>
    <updated>2025-08-18T07:30:30Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Editorial note [Melita Theologica, 75(1)]
Authors: Mangion, Claude
Abstract: Philosophical theology is a branch of philosophical investigation that examines&#xD;
questions relating to God and religion by deploying rational argumentation&#xD;
and debate rather than the authority of the Scriptures. This special edition&#xD;
of Melita Theologica attests to the upsurge in interest in questions related to&#xD;
philosophical theology. While this is now taken for granted, it has not always&#xD;
been the case, and for a good number of years, this interest, at least within certain&#xD;
philosophical circles, waned. The various themes covered in this issue reflect the&#xD;
breadth of the field of philosophical theology, with the authors engaging in the&#xD;
classical debates concerning the existence of God and the problem of evil to&#xD;
contemporary existential and political questions.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The true flaw in the ontological proof : Anselm, Kant, Husserl</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138122" />
    <author>
      <name>Harman, Graham</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138122</id>
    <updated>2025-08-18T07:25:41Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The true flaw in the ontological proof : Anselm, Kant, Husserl
Authors: Harman, Graham
Abstract: God is a being than which nothing greater can be conceived. The Fool hath&#xD;
said in his heart that there is no God, and the Fool understands what he&#xD;
is saying. Thus, he thinks that God is only in the understanding but does not&#xD;
exist in reality. But since existing is greater than not existing, a God found in&#xD;
the understanding alone would not be a being than which nothing greater can&#xD;
be conceived, which contradicts the definition of what we are speaking about.&#xD;
Therefore, God is not only in the understanding, but exists.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The problem of evil</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138119" />
    <author>
      <name>Hart, Kevin</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138119</id>
    <updated>2025-08-18T06:18:23Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The problem of evil
Authors: Hart, Kevin
Abstract: Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as ‘the problem of evil.’ There are&#xD;
responses to evil experienced as something awful that is thrown in one’s&#xD;
face, and these divide into the phenomenologically distinct categories of blame&#xD;
and lament; and there are also arguments from evil, framed in individual ways,&#xD;
not all of which have the same end in view. There is no one ‘evil.’ When the&#xD;
Psalmist recoils in the face of wickedness (Ps. 10), or when William Cowper&#xD;
cries out in pain in his “Lines Written During a Period of Insanity,” or when&#xD;
Paul Celan speaks of the “Schwarze Milch der Frühe” in “Todesfuge,” each is&#xD;
answering to a separate thing: the persecution of the poor by the unrighteous,&#xD;
a dramatic breakdown of mental health, and the murder of Jews in the Shoah. ‘Evil’ is a notoriously slippery word: it can denote moral evil (sin as it is known&#xD;
in Judaism and Christianity) or mental and physical evil (suffering); and some&#xD;
philosophers would wish to add to these one or more of metaphysical evil&#xD;
(original imperfection), intellectual evil (error, ignorance and even mistakes)&#xD;
and aesthetic evil (ugliness). [excerpt]</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

