<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/1907" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/1907</id>
  <updated>2026-04-09T20:12:35Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-09T20:12:35Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Master of Laws in International Law 2014</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15739" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15739</id>
    <updated>2020-05-15T06:55:21Z</updated>
    <published>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Master of Laws in International Law 2014
Abstract: A list of the Master of Laws in International Law (LL.M.) dissertations submitted in 2014
Description: LL.M.</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>State behaviour, compliance and enforcement in international law : an analysis of the factors which influence the behaviour of states</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/2272" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/2272</id>
    <updated>2017-10-05T14:53:39Z</updated>
    <published>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: State behaviour, compliance and enforcement in international law : an analysis of the factors which influence the behaviour of states
Abstract: The prime objective of this research is to examine the issues of state behaviour,&#xD;
compliance and enforcement in international law. These will be explored with particular&#xD;
emphasis on the factors which influence the behaviour of states. The research will&#xD;
examine how states interpret international law and how the interpretation of the same&#xD;
international principles may not be identical by all states due to factors such as historical&#xD;
development, legal tradition and cultural identity. After analysing the factors, the&#xD;
research will examine the concept of compliance and why states obey international law.&#xD;
The different theories of compliance will also be reviewed. A further examination will be&#xD;
carried out in relation to the notion of enforcement for the purpose of analysing the&#xD;
sources of enforcement and the link between compliance and enforcement in&#xD;
international law. Regard will also be had to the main enforcement mechanisms and&#xD;
how sanctions may be imposed in the absence of an enforcement authority. The&#xD;
research will also analyse the impact of the modern media on state behaviour as well as&#xD;
the influence of public opinion on state actors. Shaming sanctions which are often&#xD;
employed in order to achieve coercive outcomes will also be discussed. Last but not&#xD;
least, the research will go through the behaviour of states with regard to their&#xD;
commitment to the International Criminal Court. In particular, the chapter will examine&#xD;
the level of commitment to the ICC as well as the possible explanation of why so many&#xD;
countries are parties to the Rome Statute considering the strong enforcement&#xD;
mechanisms that it embodies.
Description: LL.M.</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Universal criminal jurisdiction : a contemporary and prospective approach</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/2175" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/2175</id>
    <updated>2018-06-14T12:56:16Z</updated>
    <published>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Universal criminal jurisdiction : a contemporary and prospective approach
Abstract: This thesis focuses on universal criminal jurisdiction and its present utilization with&#xD;
a view to the future. A cursory look at the debate on universal jurisdiction reveals&#xD;
confusion on its definition, scope, and application. This is partly due to an incorrect&#xD;
understanding of universal jurisdiction and its three facets: prescription, adjudication,&#xD;
and enforcement.&#xD;
An analysis on customary and conventional universal jurisdiction, together with cases&#xD;
such as the Arrest Warrant, affirms that the confusion surrounding the prescription&#xD;
of universal jurisdiction can be rectified by a universal and uniform definition of&#xD;
universal jurisdiction. This will allow national legislation and adjudication to treat&#xD;
this principle homogenously so as to foster the principle of legal certainty, the notion&#xD;
of the accused’s presence, subsidiarity, and the limitation of in absentia trials.&#xD;
Since universal jurisdiction challenges the doctrine of non-intervention into the affairs&#xD;
of another State, it is important to delineate the crimes attracting the exercise of&#xD;
universal jurisdiction. An inquiry into the crimes over which universal jurisdiction is&#xD;
exercised reveals that such crimes usually occur in areas outside the territory of any&#xD;
State or are so heinous that the whole international community has an interest in&#xD;
prosecuting them, especially when other States are unable or unwilling to prosecute.&#xD;
The fact that such trials involve extraterritorial crimes that are committed by aliens&#xD;
necessitates police and judicial cooperation in the enforcement of the law, which&#xD;
could be greatly aided by an international investigative unit.&#xD;
This thesis then looks to the future by advocating that universal jurisdiction should&#xD;
apply to natural and juridical persons alike. Ultimately, the task of defending universal&#xD;
jurisdiction is a worthwhile exercise because it is an important legal tool in the fight&#xD;
against impunity, in the responsibility to protect, and in the promotion of justice.
Description: LL.D.</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The common heritage of humankind in the 21st century</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/2172" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/2172</id>
    <updated>2018-06-13T10:47:16Z</updated>
    <published>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The common heritage of humankind in the 21st century
Abstract: The common heritage of humankind is a revolutionary concept in international law,&#xD;
advocating a system of global governance which had never been considered by the international&#xD;
community; one which challenges traditional international law concepts of res nullius, res&#xD;
communis and State sovereignty. The principle of common heritage is applicable to the deep&#xD;
seabed and the cosmos, and has been proposed with respect to other areas, such as the poles, the&#xD;
internet and the human genome. This work focuses on the application of the common heritage&#xD;
regime in the maritime law concept, limiting itself to a brief overview of the possibility of its&#xD;
application to other areas due to word count restrictions. The present day realities of international&#xD;
law and the challenges posed by the current state of waters beyond national jurisdiction have led&#xD;
to the proposal for the concept to be extended beyond the deep seabed. Mired in ambiguity and&#xD;
surrounded by controversy since its inception however, and with a steady increase in&#xD;
technological capability in recent decades, the concept risks becoming outdated and impractical&#xD;
as States push for privatization of the international commons. The concept must therefore evolve&#xD;
and adapt to survive, or risk becoming a relic of international law. The deteriorating health of the&#xD;
oceans and their resources and the increased access in both the Arctic and Antarctic regions,&#xD;
coupled with the inadequate laws governing these areas, facilitate the need for a new legal&#xD;
regime for their successful and sustainable regulation. This work therefore attempts to provide&#xD;
solutions to not only preserve the legal status of the common heritage principle in international&#xD;
law, but also for its extension to other areas of international commons.
Description: LL.D.</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

