<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Community: Previously known as Department of Gender Studies</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20530" />
  <subtitle>Previously known as Department of Gender Studies</subtitle>
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20530</id>
  <updated>2026-07-09T15:19:44Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-09T15:19:44Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Parenting under scrutiny : disability, motherhood, and the legacy of ableism</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147473" />
    <author>
      <name>Azzopardi Lane, Claire</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Azzopardi, Andrew</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147473</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T10:36:47Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Parenting under scrutiny : disability, motherhood, and the legacy of ableism
Authors: Azzopardi Lane, Claire; Azzopardi, Andrew
Abstract: This article examines how ableism, disablism, and structurally produced vulnerability shape &#xD;
disabled mothers’ experiences of pregnancy and parenting in Malta. Drawing on feminist &#xD;
disability studies, reproductive justice, and the social relational model of disability, the study &#xD;
situates disabled motherhood within enduring eugenic legacies and contemporary forms of &#xD;
reproductive governance that position disabled women as inherently risky, incompetent, or &#xD;
unfit to parent. Using a qualitative research design, in-depth interviews were conducted &#xD;
with four disabled mothers and two social workers working with parents with intellectual &#xD;
disabilities. Data were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis, informed by Thomas’s &#xD;
social relational model of disability and Reeve’s concept of psycho-emotional disablism.; Findings are organised around three interrelated themes: ableism, disablism, and &#xD;
structurally produced vulnerability. The analysis demonstrates how disabled mothers are &#xD;
subject to heightened surveillance, conditional recognition, and persistent scrutiny by &#xD;
healthcare, education, and child protection systems. These experiences are not reducible to &#xD;
impairment effects but are produced through inaccessible environments, deficit-based &#xD;
professional practices, communication barriers, and risk-averse institutional cultures. &#xD;
Professional narratives further reveal how vulnerability is often individualised and &#xD;
pathologised, obscuring the structural conditions that undermine disabled parents’ &#xD;
autonomy and rights.; Situated within Malta’s conservative reproductive regime and small-state welfare context, &#xD;
the study contributes empirical insight into how global disability inequalities are locally &#xD;
enacted. The article argues for a shift towards rights-based, disability-justice-informed &#xD;
parenting policies and practices that recognise disabled parents as legitimate, competent, &#xD;
and rights-holding individuals.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>"Dejjem ninkwieta fuq il-flus..." the gendered dimensions of emotional inequalities in managing household money in Malta</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147354" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147354</id>
    <updated>2026-06-11T12:04:14Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: "Dejjem ninkwieta fuq il-flus..." the gendered dimensions of emotional inequalities in managing household money in Malta
Abstract: Drawing on a critical feminist qualitative study of eight married heterosexual couples in Malta,&#xD;
interviewed both jointly and individually, this paper examines the emotional experience and&#xD;
emotional inequalities embedded in household money management. It explores how partners&#xD;
interpret responsibility, worry, and confidence in everyday financial decision-making and how these&#xD;
affective dimensions shape the gendered organisation of domestic economic life.; Analysis of 24 in-depth, semi-structured interviews reveals a persistent emotional asymmetry: wives&#xD;
consistently shoulder a disproportionate share of financial anxiety, anticipatory planning, and self-doubt&#xD;
regarding budgeting, spending, and saving. This remains evident even in couples who describe&#xD;
their financial arrangements as "shared." In contrast, husbands more frequently articulate — or are&#xD;
portrayed by their spouses as embodying — feelings of confidence, expertise, or delegated&#xD;
responsibility. Many men frame financial management as a technical or even an enjoyable task, rather&#xD;
than an ongoing emotional burden. Notably, this sense of ease is not mirrored when wives take&#xD;
primary responsibility for the household finances.; These dynamics reflect entrenched cultural norms that position women as the emotional guardians of&#xD;
household wellbeing and men as competent financial actors within marriage. The study demonstrates&#xD;
that emotional inequalities, particularly around anxiety, responsibility, and confidence, constitute an&#xD;
under-recognised dimension of the gendered division of labour.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Deconstructing gender and power : a feminist post-structuralist discourse analysis of "Il-Każin tal-Imqarbin" (misbehaved club)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147279" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147279</id>
    <updated>2026-06-10T08:10:11Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Deconstructing gender and power : a feminist post-structuralist discourse analysis of "Il-Każin tal-Imqarbin" (misbehaved club)
Abstract: This paper explores how Il-Każin tal-Imqarbin, a contemporary theatrical work set in 1980s Malta,&#xD;
constructs and challenges gendered and heteronormative discourses through the lens of Feminist&#xD;
Post-Structuralist Discourse Analysis (FPDA). By critically engaging with the play's language, character&#xD;
dynamics, and narrative structure, the research investigates how power, gender performativity, and&#xD;
marginalisation are communicated, contested, and reimagined within a historically queer-invisible&#xD;
Maltese context.; The study highlights the importance of examining cultural productions as sites where silenced&#xD;
LGBTQ+ narratives can be reclaimed and made visible, particularly in periods marked by&#xD;
institutionalised heteronormativity and social conservatism. The analysis focuses not only on the&#xD;
play's historical backdrop but also on its continuing relevance, demonstrating how Il-Każin tal-&#xD;
Imqarbin destabilises rigid binary gender roles. By adopting a feminist post-structuralist perspective,&#xD;
the paper examines how discourses surrounding gender and sexuality are both reflected and&#xD;
subverted within the script, offering alternative ways of understanding subjectivity and agency.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Institutional contradictions and gendered realities : a feminist reworking of new institutional theory in higher education</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147278" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147278</id>
    <updated>2026-06-10T08:08:10Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Institutional contradictions and gendered realities : a feminist reworking of new institutional theory in higher education
Abstract: This article investigates how formal institutional frameworks and family-friendly policies at the&#xD;
University of Malta intersect with gendered cultural norms to shape uneven outcomes for working&#xD;
mothers. Using an integrated analytical approach that draws on New Institutional Theory (NIT),&#xD;
Feminist Institutionalism, and Institutional Ethnography (IE), the study reveals how organisational&#xD;
structures that appear inclusive on the surface are often undermined by discretionary practices and&#xD;
informal expectations that reproduce gendered hierarchies.; The research combines textual analysis of institutional documents, survey data, and qualitative&#xD;
interviews with academic and support-staff mothers. The findings demonstrate a consistent&#xD;
implementation gap between policy and practice, highlighting the influence of managerial discretion,&#xD;
entrenched power asymmetries, and the persistence of invisible labour. By bringing feminist&#xD;
institutional insights into conversation with NIT and IE, the study offers a more nuanced framework&#xD;
for understanding the motherhood penalty in academia and underscores the need for stronger&#xD;
accountability and gender-sensitive institutional practices.; The argument builds on and extends existing feminist scholarship on institutional processes and&#xD;
inequalities (Cacace, Mellino, &amp; Recio, 2023; Chappell &amp; Waylen, 2020; Monro, 2021; O'Connor, 2022;&#xD;
Smith &amp; Griffith, 2022).</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

