<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20636" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20636</id>
  <updated>2026-07-11T19:25:53Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-11T19:25:53Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>The rise and fall of sub-national island jurisdictions : the cases of the Galapagos Islands and San Andres y providencia</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/21076" />
    <author>
      <name>Kerr, Sandy</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/21076</id>
    <updated>2017-08-09T01:22:00Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The rise and fall of sub-national island jurisdictions : the cases of the Galapagos Islands and San Andres y providencia
Authors: Kerr, Sandy
Abstract: Starting with Iceland in 1944, the emergence of many small sovereign island states has&#xD;
generated interest in the economic and political viability and vulnerability of small&#xD;
jurisdictions. This seemingly irresistible march to sovereignty proceeded for several&#xD;
decades after the Second World War, before waning considerably in recent years.&#xD;
Instead, many island jurisdictions today choose to operate as relatively autonomous&#xD;
units within a larger 'federal' framework encompassing larger states. Hence, recent&#xD;
island scholarship has taken a natural turn towards sub-national or non-sovereign&#xD;
jurisdictional powers and arrangements. The case studies selected for this comparative study of sub-national island&#xD;
jurisdictions (SNlJs), the Galapagos Islands and San Andres and Old Providence (SAOP), are in many respects typical of islands around the world. Their respective&#xD;
economies, for example, are dominated by the primary and tertiary sector activities of&#xD;
fishing and tourism.</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Index</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/21073" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/21073</id>
    <updated>2017-08-09T01:21:57Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Index
Abstract: Index. In G. Baldacchino, &amp; D. Milne (Eds.), The case for non-sovereignty : lessons from sub-national island jurisdictions.
Description: Names of contributors are in upper case lettering&#xD;
References to their chapters are in bold</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The case for non-sovereignty</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/21072" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/21072</id>
    <updated>2017-08-09T01:21:57Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The case for non-sovereignty
Abstract: Territories like American Samoa, Anguilla, Aruba, Bermuda, the British Virgin&#xD;
Islands, the Cayman Islands, the Cook Islands and the Faeroes are sub-national&#xD;
island jurisdictions (SNIJs). They all share some measure of&#xD;
autonomous government, and are easily construed as independent states-in-waiting.&#xD;
Yet most of these territories exhibit no urgency to become&#xD;
independent. Instead, they appear to have decided that there are political&#xD;
and economic benefits accruing today when island territories are autonomous&#xD;
but not sovereign.
Description: Most of the papers in this volume were previously published as a special issue&#xD;
of The Round Table: Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, Vol.&#xD;
95, Issue No. 386, September 2006. This volume is dedicated to Peter H. Lyon OBE, in grateful acknowledgement of his&#xD;
generous support and service to the Island Studies programme, its faculty and&#xD;
students at the University of Prince Edward Island, Canada, over many years. Peter's&#xD;
contribution to the development of the Institute of Island Studies and to the&#xD;
interdisciplinary graduate programme in Island Studies at UPEI has been&#xD;
exceptional, as has been his unfailing support and enthusiasm for our research&#xD;
and publications in Commonwealth outlets, including The Round Table.</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>‘We are not ready’ : colonialism or autonomy in Tokelau</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/21071" />
    <author>
      <name>Connell, John</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/21071</id>
    <updated>2017-08-09T01:21:56Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: ‘We are not ready’ : colonialism or autonomy in Tokelau
Authors: Connell, John
Abstract: Predictions of global decolonisation have waxed and waned. In the 1960s, during the&#xD;
first great wave of decolonisation, it was widely assumed that there would be distinct&#xD;
limits to this process and that numerous places were too small ever to become&#xD;
independent. At that time, only Western Samoa (now Samoa), Tokelau's nearest&#xD;
neighbour, was independent in the Pacific, and it was not until the 1970s that other&#xD;
Pacific island states followed. Even smaller states, such as Tuvalu with barely 10,000&#xD;
people, did become independent despite warnings about their viability. In some there&#xD;
was local concern about uneven development, limited resources and infrastructure (as&#xD;
for example in the Solomon Islands), and many small states went to independence&#xD;
with trepidation as much as jubilation (Aldrich and Connell, 1998: 246). Nonetheless,&#xD;
the mood had shifted to the extent that it was loosely assumed that even the&#xD;
smallest colonial possessions would eventually become independent, or, at the very&#xD;
least, would take on a much greater degree of self-government.</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

