<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20827" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20827</id>
  <updated>2026-04-11T11:31:10Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-11T11:31:10Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Materialsm and the mind and body problem : a critical analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20937" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20937</id>
    <updated>2018-04-17T12:42:00Z</updated>
    <published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Materialsm and the mind and body problem : a critical analysis
Abstract: The philosophy of mind has become dominated by the mind and&#xD;
body problem: the relation between the physical (the body) and the&#xD;
mental (the mind). Substance dualism had traditionally been the&#xD;
method for accounting for this problem. Substance dualism though,&#xD;
as we shall see, has been very ineffective in accounting for all&#xD;
problems. A consequence of this failure has been the rise of&#xD;
materialism in the forms of behaviorism, identity theory (also&#xD;
known as physicalism) and functionalism. Many tend to believe that&#xD;
materialism may provide us with the solution to the mind and body&#xD;
problem; however, in this essay I will argue that the materialist&#xD;
perspective, like the substance dualist tradition, is flawed. It can&#xD;
only account for the quantitative and objective aspects of the mind&#xD;
and not the qualitative and personal ones.</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Critique as therapy : reflections on Foucault and Derrida</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20936" />
    <author>
      <name>Borg, Kurt</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20936</id>
    <updated>2022-01-12T13:28:41Z</updated>
    <published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Critique as therapy : reflections on Foucault and Derrida
Authors: Borg, Kurt
Abstract: Perhaps one of the most crucial philosophical questions to ask is&#xD;
"what is philosophy?" But, perhaps too, the possibility of asking that&#xD;
question points towards the fragmented nature of the enterprise.&#xD;
Through the shadows of Foucault and Derrida, I will try to show&#xD;
how this question is important since it continually expands the&#xD;
definition of philosophy, blurring its territorial boundaries in such a&#xD;
way that enables an otherwise-thought world, preventing&#xD;
philosophy from being another disciplinary regime. Since antiquity,&#xD;
philosophy's reliance on a notion of truth provided it with analytical&#xD;
leverage. Hence, by placing the currency of truth itself under&#xD;
scrutiny, it is claimed that thinkers like Foucault and Derrida risk&#xD;
undermining philosophical inquiry tout court, reducing philosophy&#xD;
to rhetoric or fiction, with no critical function whatsoever. What's&#xD;
more, because of this, no normative grounding can be extrapolated&#xD;
from their ideas, no emancipatory aim can be sought and no ethical&#xD;
framework can be pursued. Both FoucauIt and Derrida were often&#xD;
criticized along these lines (Habermas, 1987).</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The capacity to begin : Arendt's concept of 'Natality' (a humble tribute on the 40th anniversary of her death)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20935" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20935</id>
    <updated>2017-08-03T01:19:00Z</updated>
    <published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The capacity to begin : Arendt's concept of 'Natality' (a humble tribute on the 40th anniversary of her death)
Abstract: In this short essay I intend to refer to Arendt's concept of&#xD;
'natality', which she expounds in her book The Human Condition,&#xD;
to argue against the distinction which Peter Singer makes between&#xD;
a human person and human non-person; with reference to his book&#xD;
Practical Ethics (1993) as being representative of preference-utilitarianism&#xD;
and consequentialism.</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The artist behind the art : an interview with Adrian Abela</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20933" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/20933</id>
    <updated>2020-05-19T12:08:52Z</updated>
    <published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The artist behind the art : an interview with Adrian Abela
Abstract: Interview with Adrian Abela about his art and his latest piece inspired by architect Adolf Loos.</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

