<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26481" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26481</id>
  <updated>2026-04-13T03:42:55Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-13T03:42:55Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>The elderly patient and quality of life judgements</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26805" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26805</id>
    <updated>2018-02-16T02:28:39Z</updated>
    <published>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The elderly patient and quality of life judgements
Abstract: How does one define quality of life in the elderly age group?&#xD;
Is it their health status; their functional status; whether they&#xD;
are still living in their own homes; their financial means,&#xD;
whether their favourite football team is winning? Since I have&#xD;
been asked to discuss patients, I'll stick to health.</summary>
    <dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The rights of the dying patient</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26802" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26802</id>
    <updated>2018-02-16T02:28:33Z</updated>
    <published>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The rights of the dying patient
Abstract: At no time in our history have we been so reluctant to face&#xD;
death and discuss it. Death, which is such an intrinsic part of&#xD;
life, has become a taboo for today's culture. In actual fact, it is&#xD;
not death itself that people dread, but the manner, time and&#xD;
even place of death. As a result of this fear to talk about death,&#xD;
today's culture is facing the danger of leaving the dying to&#xD;
approach their end unsupported not only by their relatives,&#xD;
but even by health carers.&#xD;
In order to provide the best possible care and treatment for&#xD;
dying patients, nurses, doctors and other health care&#xD;
professionals who come in direct contact with terminally-ill&#xD;
patients need to be trained in those attitudes and dispositions&#xD;
which enable them to approach the dying patient with skills&#xD;
and confidence with which they treat other patients. Training&#xD;
in palliative care, or care of the dying, needs to feature more&#xD;
prominently in the curriculum of all health care professionals.</summary>
    <dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The advance directive</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26794" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26794</id>
    <updated>2018-02-16T02:28:40Z</updated>
    <published>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The advance directive
Abstract: Advance directives are an indispensable and essential part&#xD;
of medical practice today. They give the power to a patient to&#xD;
make an informed choice, within the law of the country, about&#xD;
him or her when mentally incapacitated, dying or in palliative&#xD;
care. A patient may designate a trusted person or family doctor&#xD;
to be his or her health care representative and take decisions&#xD;
on his or her behalf. In this case the advance directive is a&#xD;
written statement addressing who this 'power of attorney for&#xD;
health care' is. The power of attorney, that is, the person acting&#xD;
on the patient's behalf, obviates the problem that living wills&#xD;
are not legally binding and therefore may be challenged by&#xD;
relatives and the medical team. The word of the person&#xD;
designated by the patient to act on his or her behalf is almost&#xD;
as binding as the word of the patient.</summary>
    <dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Witholding and withdrawing treatments : ethics at the bedside</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26791" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26791</id>
    <updated>2018-02-16T02:28:33Z</updated>
    <published>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Witholding and withdrawing treatments : ethics at the bedside
Abstract: in the last few decades it has become clear that treatment&#xD;
should not be prolonged indefinitely, when it has ceased to&#xD;
provide a benefit for the patient. Mechanical respirators, artificial&#xD;
hearts, dialysis machines, and resuscitation techniques can&#xD;
prolong the act of dying and at great financial, social, and&#xD;
emotional costs to individuals and society. Now the central&#xD;
ethical question is: When is it morally permissible or even&#xD;
mandatory to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments?&#xD;
How is Hippocrates' moral dictum to be implemented amid the&#xD;
technical complexities of contemporary medicine?</summary>
    <dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

