<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28236" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28236</id>
  <updated>2026-04-10T13:36:52Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-10T13:36:52Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Melita Theologica : volume 28 : issue 1-2</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28427" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28427</id>
    <updated>2018-03-29T01:26:40Z</updated>
    <published>1976-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Melita Theologica : volume 28 : issue 1-2
Abstract: 1/ GRIMA, G. - Christ and conversion : H. Richard Niebuhr's thought between 1933 and 1937 --&#xD;
2/ SERRACINO-INGLOTT, P. - The necessary bilingualism of Christians --&#xD;
3/ COLLINS, R. F. - 'He came to dwell among us' --&#xD;
4/ Book reviews.</summary>
    <dc:date>1976-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>'He came to dwell among us'</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28419" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28419</id>
    <updated>2018-03-29T01:26:42Z</updated>
    <published>1976-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: 'He came to dwell among us'
Abstract: There was a time when the most popular exegesis of Jn 1:14 placed considerable emphasis upon the etymology of the verb skenoun, 'to dwell in a tent'. The allusion to nomadic life contained in the term made it a natural and effective symbol of the temporary presence of the enfleshed Word among His own. Many of the older commentaries explicated the verse in this way. So, too, do some of the more recent commentaries, as well as the dictionary of Arndt-Gingrich.</summary>
    <dc:date>1976-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The necessary bilingualism of Christians</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28418" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28418</id>
    <updated>2024-12-16T09:27:05Z</updated>
    <published>1976-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The necessary bilingualism of Christians
Abstract: Although philosophers and other intellectuals have always reflected on politics, by which I mean the power-relations existing in all human societies, the need for explicit mass political education was only felt in special circumstances. The major examples of these special circumstances that come to mind are two. In the first place, the need to impart a general political education, which was called 'civics', was felt in countries which received a large number of emigrants from other countries with different political system, e.g. in the United States of America, with its system of liberal capitalism, the political education of new corners from the authoritarian agrarian societies of Czarist Russia or Bourbon Sicily, was felt to be a necessity.</summary>
    <dc:date>1976-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Christ and conversion : H. Richard Niebuhr's thought between 1933 and 1937</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28417" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28417</id>
    <updated>2018-03-29T01:26:39Z</updated>
    <published>1976-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Christ and conversion : H. Richard Niebuhr's thought between 1933 and 1937
Abstract: Helmut Richard Niebuhr is generally regarded as one of the most influential contemporary Protestant theologian in America. Partly because he wrote relatively little and partly because he shunned publicity, he did not succeed in attaining the stature of people like Karl Barth, Rudolph Bultmann, Emil Brunner in Europe and his brother, Reinhold Niebuhr, in America. Nevertheless, in his published writings and, especially, in his lectures at Yale Divinity School, where he taught from 1931 until his death in 1962, he showed that he could criticize in a strong yet pertinent way the thought of his contemporaries. Besides, he managed to develop original insights from which the present generation of American theologians are drawing fruitful inspiration.</summary>
    <dc:date>1976-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

