<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28463" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28463</id>
  <updated>2026-04-10T09:43:23Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-10T09:43:23Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Trends and unit roots in Greek real money supply, real GDP and nominal interest rate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30446" />
    <author>
      <name>Christos, Karpetis</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Erotokritos, Varelas</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30446</id>
    <updated>2018-05-26T01:24:59Z</updated>
    <published>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Trends and unit roots in Greek real money supply, real GDP and nominal interest rate
Authors: Christos, Karpetis; Erotokritos, Varelas
Abstract: This paper presents the results of a unit root investigation of Greek real&#xD;
money supply, real G.D.P. and nominal interest rate, after following a sequen -&#xD;
tial procedure which takes into consideration the effect of the possibly&#xD;
erroneus presence or absence of the trend and/or intercept on the augmented&#xD;
Dickey – Fuller unit root test procedure.</summary>
    <dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testing the degree of openness of the Greek capital account : a cointegration analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30349" />
    <author>
      <name>Paleologos, John M.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Georgantelis, Spyros E.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30349</id>
    <updated>2018-05-25T01:30:38Z</updated>
    <published>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Testing the degree of openness of the Greek capital account : a cointegration analysis
Authors: Paleologos, John M.; Georgantelis, Spyros E.
Abstract: The issue of capital mobility and the related issue of financial market integration is one of the most pronounced cases of contradiction between casual&#xD;
empiricism and conventional wisdom, in the one hand, and the results of&#xD;
formal empirical testing on the other. The question of the degree of capital&#xD;
mobility is an important one in economic analysis. This is because the assumptions one makes about the degree to which capital is mobile internationally&#xD;
can significantly influence the conclusions of the analysis. Over the past&#xD;
decade developing countries have experienced a continuing process of financial&#xD;
market liberalization and growing financial flows. Measuring the degree of&#xD;
capital mobility – defined as the degree of linkage between domestic and foreign&#xD;
interest rates – is central to our understanding and assessment of financial&#xD;
liberalization and its consequences. There are some methodological issues&#xD;
concerning the degree of capital mobility: The connection between capital&#xD;
mobility and market integration seems to be clear; if markets are integrated&#xD;
then capital will move more freely. Feldstein and Horioka (1980) have proposed&#xD;
to measure capital mobility using the degree of correlation between&#xD;
saving and investment rates. The Ferdstein-Horioka criterion also implies that&#xD;
capital mobility can be measured on the basis of differential (nominal and&#xD;
real) rates of interest. However, other researchers argued that the saving-investment&#xD;
correlation is not a proper measure of the degree of capital mobility&#xD;
and market integration (Goldstein et al, 1991), Frankel and MacArthur (1988).&#xD;
In this paper, following Edwards and Khan (1985), the domestic interest rate&#xD;
is hypothesized to depend on weighted average of domestic and foreign factos.&#xD;
The approach that was used is maximum likelihood cointegration analysis&#xD;
of Johansen (1988), and Johansen and Juseliu (1990). The results support&#xD;
the impact of both domestic and international influences on the domestic rate&#xD;
in the case of Greek economy. The evidence based on the Edwards and&#xD;
Khan (1985) approach seems to support the hypothesis of high (but not perfect)&#xD;
capital mobility in the Greek economy. The capital is highly mobile.</summary>
    <dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>International evidence on convergence and openness</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30348" />
    <author>
      <name>Chortareas, Georgios E.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Desli, Evangelia</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Pelagidis, Theodore</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30348</id>
    <updated>2018-05-25T01:30:39Z</updated>
    <published>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: International evidence on convergence and openness
Authors: Chortareas, Georgios E.; Desli, Evangelia; Pelagidis, Theodore
Abstract: In this paper we examine for both economic convergence and openness&#xD;
convergence across the global economy and within specific regions. We find&#xD;
that convergence in openness is much more profound than income convergence.&#xD;
Moreover, convergence within regions takes place faster than convergence across the globe. We then examine for the effects of trade openness&#xD;
on income convergence. We use both trade openness indicators based on&#xD;
actual trade volumes as well as indices that rank countries according to trade&#xD;
policy openness. Finally, we consider the effects of such indices on openness&#xD;
convergence. We discuss our results in the context of the regionalism versus&#xD;
globalization debate.</summary>
    <dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Foreign direct investment : the case of Eastern Europe</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30347" />
    <author>
      <name>Lyroudi, Katerina C.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Subeniotis, Demetres N.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Georgopoulos, Nikolaos B.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30347</id>
    <updated>2018-05-25T01:30:40Z</updated>
    <published>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Foreign direct investment : the case of Eastern Europe
Authors: Lyroudi, Katerina C.; Subeniotis, Demetres N.; Georgopoulos, Nikolaos B.
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine the market’s reaction to the announcement&#xD;
foreign direct investment in Eastern Europe for firms from various&#xD;
Western European countries and from Japan during the first merge wave&#xD;
after the Berlin Wall removal. The results indicated that there is either an insignificant&#xD;
negative reaction, or no consistent significant reaction to the announcements&#xD;
of joint ventures or direct foreign investment. U.S.S.R. seems to&#xD;
be the most risky of the target countries. The present conditions of uncertainty&#xD;
and high political economic risk appear to offset any favourable effects. The&#xD;
results may be period specific since there was an unusually high level of uncertainty&#xD;
surrounding the removal of the Wall.</summary>
    <dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

