<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28468" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28468</id>
  <updated>2026-04-14T08:00:51Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-14T08:00:51Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Is the current German de-industrialization similar to the British case of the 1870-1914 period? similarities and differences</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32169" />
    <author>
      <name>Salavrakos, Ioannis Dionysios</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32169</id>
    <updated>2018-07-25T01:32:55Z</updated>
    <published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Is the current German de-industrialization similar to the British case of the 1870-1914 period? similarities and differences
Authors: Salavrakos, Ioannis Dionysios
Abstract: Globalization is a phenomenon, which has different influence on national&#xD;
economies. Thus, some national economies have benefited (i.e. winners), while&#xD;
others have experienced a harmful outcome (i.e. losers). However, globalization&#xD;
is not a new phenomenon. The first truly globalised economy existed in the era of&#xD;
the second industrial revolution (1870-1914) with the increase of global trade and&#xD;
FDI, rise of big businesses, labor mobility due to immigration, innovation with the&#xD;
creation of new industries etc. At that early stage Germany was a winner and&#xD;
Britain was a loser. However, nowadays, the opposite trend is occurring.&#xD;
Nowadays Britain is one of the winners of the new globalization wave, whereas&#xD;
Germany is considered at best a problematic case (if not a loser). Focusing&#xD;
mainly on industry we provide a comparative assessment.</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Democracy and institutional change</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32168" />
    <author>
      <name>Kyriazis, Nicholas</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32168</id>
    <updated>2018-07-25T01:32:55Z</updated>
    <published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Democracy and institutional change
Authors: Kyriazis, Nicholas
Abstract: The present essay analyses decision making procedures concerning&#xD;
economic issues such as the choice of public goods in the prototype democracy,&#xD;
Ancient Athens of the fourth century BC (the “Age of Demosthenes”). It analyses&#xD;
the link between political democracy, “economic” democracy, the emergence of&#xD;
new institutions and the finance of public goods like defence, education and&#xD;
“social security”. The prototype political democracy was advanced in questions&#xD;
of public administration, finance and institutions, on which political democracy&#xD;
was based. The paper concludes with some proposals as to what we could “learn” from&#xD;
the workings of “economic democracy” that is relevant for today’s democracies.</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The current models of market orientation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32167" />
    <author>
      <name>Tomaskova, Eva</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32167</id>
    <updated>2018-07-25T01:33:02Z</updated>
    <published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The current models of market orientation
Authors: Tomaskova, Eva
Abstract: The paper is focused on the development of the model of market orientation. The&#xD;
model of market orientation looks for the factors that preceded the market orientation&#xD;
and detects the factors that are from the market orientation affected. At first, there is&#xD;
stated compilation of the new finding at definition market orientation. The second part is&#xD;
devoted to positive and negative influences market orientation on business performance.&#xD;
There is also compilation of theoretical information about marketing orientation by&#xD;
authors working in this field in the paper. The main conclusions are stated in the last part&#xD;
of the work.</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What is at stake with globalization?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31863" />
    <author>
      <name>Rogojanu, Angela</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31863</id>
    <updated>2018-07-18T01:29:41Z</updated>
    <published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: What is at stake with globalization?
Authors: Rogojanu, Angela
Abstract: It  is hard  to  explain why  it  is necessary  to defend globalization  even  in  the 21st &#xD;
century. Why  globalization  becomes  the  necessary  evil  every  twenty  years?  And  why &#xD;
there  are  plenty  of  organized  movements  against  globalization,  but  no  one  for  it? &#xD;
Answering  these questions has become a kind of strange sport, because  there are a  few &#xD;
decent more  than  reasonable  arguments  that must  be  given  every  time  globalization  is &#xD;
under attack, and maybe other argument can’t be invented. Nevertheless, it  is of utmost &#xD;
importance to be certain that people are able to find out these arguments and understand &#xD;
them,  even  they  describe  some  situations  that  are  apparently  unfavorable  for  some &#xD;
people. However,  the main  cause  of  the  continuing  bombardment  of  globalization  is  in &#xD;
fact its destroying effect on states authority. As long as we are heading to a more global &#xD;
world, the power of governments over their modern subjects (not citizens as they wrongly &#xD;
believe  they are)  is  falling  apart. This  fact  is  felt  by  all  those who  take  a benefit  from &#xD;
government protection and funding. As long as an individual can travel around the world &#xD;
and choose where to stay easier than 50 years ago, it is more difficult for the state to tax &#xD;
this citizen. And therefore, it is more difficult to provide funding to those who depend on &#xD;
the state help (and are a source of political power).</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

