<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28499" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28499</id>
  <updated>2026-04-05T11:34:31Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-05T11:34:31Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Is the current German de-industrialization similar to the British case of the 1870-1914 period? similarities and differences</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32169" />
    <author>
      <name>Salavrakos, Ioannis Dionysios</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32169</id>
    <updated>2018-07-25T01:32:55Z</updated>
    <published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Is the current German de-industrialization similar to the British case of the 1870-1914 period? similarities and differences
Authors: Salavrakos, Ioannis Dionysios
Abstract: Globalization is a phenomenon, which has different influence on national&#xD;
economies. Thus, some national economies have benefited (i.e. winners), while&#xD;
others have experienced a harmful outcome (i.e. losers). However, globalization&#xD;
is not a new phenomenon. The first truly globalised economy existed in the era of&#xD;
the second industrial revolution (1870-1914) with the increase of global trade and&#xD;
FDI, rise of big businesses, labor mobility due to immigration, innovation with the&#xD;
creation of new industries etc. At that early stage Germany was a winner and&#xD;
Britain was a loser. However, nowadays, the opposite trend is occurring.&#xD;
Nowadays Britain is one of the winners of the new globalization wave, whereas&#xD;
Germany is considered at best a problematic case (if not a loser). Focusing&#xD;
mainly on industry we provide a comparative assessment.</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Democracy and institutional change</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32168" />
    <author>
      <name>Kyriazis, Nicholas</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32168</id>
    <updated>2018-07-25T01:32:55Z</updated>
    <published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Democracy and institutional change
Authors: Kyriazis, Nicholas
Abstract: The present essay analyses decision making procedures concerning&#xD;
economic issues such as the choice of public goods in the prototype democracy,&#xD;
Ancient Athens of the fourth century BC (the “Age of Demosthenes”). It analyses&#xD;
the link between political democracy, “economic” democracy, the emergence of&#xD;
new institutions and the finance of public goods like defence, education and&#xD;
“social security”. The prototype political democracy was advanced in questions&#xD;
of public administration, finance and institutions, on which political democracy&#xD;
was based. The paper concludes with some proposals as to what we could “learn” from&#xD;
the workings of “economic democracy” that is relevant for today’s democracies.</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trade regionalization, exchange rate policies and EU-US economic cooperation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31814" />
    <author>
      <name>Thalassinos, Eleftherios</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31814</id>
    <updated>2018-07-18T01:29:43Z</updated>
    <published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Trade regionalization, exchange rate policies and EU-US economic cooperation
Authors: Thalassinos, Eleftherios
Abstract: This paper demonstrates that trade regionalization has important&#xD;
monetary and exchange rate implications. It goes on and argues that EU&#xD;
increased importance in the monetary field following the euro’s introduction and&#xD;
the anticipated development of its international role may contain the hazard of&#xD;
confrontation between the major blocks and therefore lead to a system less stable&#xD;
than a unpopular system. Appropriate arrangements for cooperation between the&#xD;
poles will be crucial to the stability of the system.</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The ideal-typical transition from fordism to post-fordism : a neopositivist problem setting</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31807" />
    <author>
      <name>Markantonatou, Maria</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31807</id>
    <updated>2018-07-18T01:29:43Z</updated>
    <published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The ideal-typical transition from fordism to post-fordism : a neopositivist problem setting
Authors: Markantonatou, Maria
Abstract: The present article discusses a fundamental argument of a series of&#xD;
regulation approaches. Although regulation approaches are heterogeneous, both&#xD;
in their premises and in their analytical instruments, this relatively common&#xD;
argument describes a shift at the level of the economy, the state and the&#xD;
organization of work: from Fordism to post-Fordism and from Keynesianism to&#xD;
neoliberalism. Despite the influence of this argument in economic and social&#xD;
theory and despite its contribution to recent debates about neoliberalization and&#xD;
the crisis of the welfare state, this transition also sets some methodological&#xD;
limitations presented in this article.</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

