<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30632" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30632</id>
  <updated>2026-04-08T22:53:45Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-08T22:53:45Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>The walled town of Alcudia as a focus for an alternative tourism in Mallorca</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31051" />
    <author>
      <name>Bruce, David</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Serra Cantallops, Antonio</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31051</id>
    <updated>2018-06-15T01:24:41Z</updated>
    <published>1996-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The walled town of Alcudia as a focus for an alternative tourism in Mallorca
Authors: Bruce, David; Serra Cantallops, Antonio
Abstract: The town of Alcudia in Mallorca was selected as one of four walled towns for&#xD;
a European Commission funded study of sustainable tourism (European&#xD;
Commission, 1992). Each town (Chepstow in South Wales, Conwy in North&#xD;
Wales and Naarden in Holland) had a broadly similar population - between&#xD;
8000 and 16,000 - and overlapping similarities in terms of tourism, geography&#xD;
or history. As walled towns, they were all examples of the preindustrial&#xD;
culture of Europe and contained important elements of that preindustrial&#xD;
heritage (Bruce, 1994). The walled towns of Alcudia and Conwy&#xD;
were both close to mass family seaside resort areas. All four towns have been&#xD;
more or less thoroughly by-passed by modern roads. Each has been studied&#xD;
in conjunction with the local municipal government by a neighbouring&#xD;
university: in the case of Alcudia, the University of the Balearics.&#xD;
Since a crisis point in the mid-1980s, the Balearics generally (Ruiz, 1990)&#xD;
and the Municipal Government of Alcudia have begun to seek a more varied&#xD;
and improved marketing image for the island. The idea of the walled town as&#xD;
a focus for an 'alternative' tourism was therefore attractive (Alcudia, 1992) if&#xD;
it could be done sustainably. It fitted well into one of the limited roles seen for&#xD;
alternative tourism: 'to complement mass tourism by increasing attractions&#xD;
and authenticity' (Butler, 1992).&#xD;
The definition for 'sustainability' was taken to be that of the World&#xD;
Commission on Environment and Development (1987) as meeting 'the needs&#xD;
of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet&#xD;
their own needs'. In terms of tourism, it was more closely defined as 'green'&#xD;
within the potentially conflicting senses of conserving irreplaceable cultural&#xD;
and physical resources, not adding further to global warming and noxious&#xD;
side-effects, and being community based and supported (Jackson and Bruce, 1992). A fuller discussion of the working definition was reported to the&#xD;
Leisure Studies Association Annual International Conference in July 1993&#xD;
(Bruce and Jackson, 1993).&#xD;
This understanding was directly compatible with the basic shared concern&#xD;
of the Walled Towns Friendship Circle to develop tourism sustainably&#xD;
without damaging the physical, historical or social fabric of their towns&#xD;
(Bacon, 1991). Associated success criteria evolved to ensure that no significant&#xD;
disadvantages were caused to the town, its residents, the ecology and&#xD;
the environment from seeking to increase income and employment from&#xD;
tourism.&#xD;
The Alctidia study was part of the testing process for the general approach,&#xD;
which generated a handbook of good practice for sustainable tourism in&#xD;
walled (and by extension other historic) towns for Directorate General 23 Qf&#xD;
the European Commission (Bruce et al., 1993).</summary>
    <dc:date>1996-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Economic strategies for sustainable tourism in islands : the case of Tenerife</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31049" />
    <author>
      <name>McNutt, Patrick A.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Oreja-Rodriguez, Juan Ramon</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31049</id>
    <updated>2018-06-15T01:24:40Z</updated>
    <published>1996-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Economic strategies for sustainable tourism in islands : the case of Tenerife
Authors: McNutt, Patrick A.; Oreja-Rodriguez, Juan Ramon
Abstract: The objective of this chapter is to analyse the issue of 'sustainable development'&#xD;
in an insular tourist-orientated economy, Tenerife. Sustainable tourism&#xD;
development requires the many economic agents involved in tourist-related&#xD;
activities to take cognizance of the insular environment. Our analysis complements&#xD;
the literature on sustainability by introducing some of the elements&#xD;
of both club theory and strategic management in order to appraise the private&#xD;
and the public response to sustainable tourism. Tenerife in the Canary&#xD;
Islands will be used as a reference case study and observations drawn from&#xD;
the recommendations at the 1986 Interoceanic Workshop in Puerto Rico will&#xD;
factor into the conclusions reached in this chapter. The problem, we contend,&#xD;
is simply too many tourists. The solution is tourist capping.&#xD;
We begin with the premiss that public and private strategies for sustainable&#xD;
tourism in islands must achieve a balance between environmental&#xD;
conservation and economic gain. There is an economic trade-off and a&#xD;
consequent opportunity cost in the use of the real resources on the island.&#xD;
Therefore the supply side could be represented by a convex production&#xD;
possibility set (McNutt, 1992) which emphasizes the economic trade-off&#xD;
across economic agents on the island. In other words, an upper limit on the&#xD;
number of visitors to the island must be imposed if the environment is to be&#xD;
maintained. Such a trade-off will inevitably incite rent-seeking behaviour as&#xD;
individual agents seek to protect their particular share of the tourist revenues.&#xD;
In our cursory analysis of the tourism sector in Tenerife we examine the&#xD;
opportunities and threats as well as the strengths and weaknesses of Tenerife's&#xD;
hospitality industry. The concluding section proffers competitive strategies which might serve to develop business strategies in the light of the&#xD;
changing holiday demand patterns which are having an important effect on&#xD;
the current economic situation on the island of Tenerife. According to the&#xD;
Chairman of the Committee on Tourism of the Spanish Employers Association&#xD;
(CEOE), the 1992 summer season on the island was 'an exceptional one';&#xD;
however, it should not be forgotten that any 'tourism bonanza' in terms of the&#xD;
number of visitors is merely temporary and hence measures are needed if&#xD;
Tenerife's future as a tourist resort is to be assured. Manuel Hermosa, Vice&#xD;
President of the Canarian Government and a former Mayor of Santa Cruz,&#xD;
stated on the occasion of the opening of the International Tourism Fair&#xD;
(Atlantur) that in order for the archipelago's tourism industry to improve the&#xD;
sector must undergo a 'process of reconversion'; furthermore, the economic&#xD;
agents involved must cooperate and a Law of Tourism must be drawn up.&#xD;
We concur with this sentiment.</summary>
    <dc:date>1996-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tourism development and the need for community action in Mykonos, Greece</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31048" />
    <author>
      <name>Stott, Margaret A.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31048</id>
    <updated>2018-06-15T01:24:37Z</updated>
    <published>1996-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Tourism development and the need for community action in Mykonos, Greece
Authors: Stott, Margaret A.
Abstract: Tourism continues to thrive as a growth industry in many parts of the world,&#xD;
bringing economic and social progress as well as environmental and sociocultural&#xD;
pressures to developing areas (Goodall and Ashworth, 1988: preface).&#xD;
In recent decades the industry has increasingly drawn attention as a&#xD;
subject for academic study. Since the late 1960s, in particular, significant&#xD;
research findings have begun to emerge (Pearce, 1993: 1).&#xD;
While interest in the phenomenon of tourism has developed in many&#xD;
disciplines (Przeclawski, 1993: 12), the problems explored can be generally&#xD;
grouped into two categories. Some focus on the tourist (or' guest', cf. Smith,&#xD;
1977) and the tourism product experienced by that tourist (for example,&#xD;
Goodall and Ashworth, 1988). Others focus on the destination and the 'hosts',&#xD;
their relationship with the tourism product provided in their community or&#xD;
region, and the nature and effects of their experience with tourists and the&#xD;
industry (for example, de Kadt, 1979). Growing awareness of potential&#xD;
positive and negative influences deriving from tourism suggests a continuing&#xD;
need for research in these areas. 'As tourism continues to expand,&#xD;
questions concerning associated economic, environmental and social effects&#xD;
will become more pressing' (Mathieson and Wall, 1982: 2).&#xD;
Study of the effects of tourism on the natural environment have been&#xD;
consistent with heightened international concern about the future of the&#xD;
earth and its resources (cf. Mathieson and Wall, 1982: 4 and 93-132). Coincidental&#xD;
with this interest in the effects of tourism on the natural environment&#xD;
has grown concern about the relationship and effects of tourism on the&#xD;
economic, social, cultural and psychological environments of host communities.</summary>
    <dc:date>1996-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ecotourism in the Caribbean : a sustainable option for Belize and Dominica?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31047" />
    <author>
      <name>Cater, Erlet</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31047</id>
    <updated>2018-06-15T01:24:38Z</updated>
    <published>1996-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Ecotourism in the Caribbean : a sustainable option for Belize and Dominica?
Authors: Cater, Erlet
Abstract: The Central American state of Belize and the Caribbean island of Dominica&#xD;
have both been actively promoting themselves as ecotourism destinations&#xD;
over recent years. Belize is marketed with the use of slogans such as&#xD;
'Naturally Yours' and 'The Adventure Coast', and Dominica claims to be the&#xD;
'Nature Island of the Caribbean'. While Belize (Figure 7.1) is considerably&#xD;
larger than Dominica (Figure 7.2), with a population of 188,000 and a land&#xD;
area of 23,000 km2 as opposed to a population of 72,000 (1991) and a land area&#xD;
of 751 km2, there are many similarities between the two small nation states,&#xD;
inviting inevitable comparisons and parallels to be drawn. Both are lower&#xD;
middle-income nations in World Bank terms: Belize had a per capita GNP of&#xD;
US$2010 and Dominica of US$2440 in 1991. Typical of the economies of most&#xD;
less-developed nations, agricultural products constitute a sizeable proportion&#xD;
of their exports, rendering them vulnerable to fluctuations in world&#xD;
trade and meaning they have to import the bulk of their requirements for&#xD;
manufactured goods. As both have balance of payments deficits, it is not&#xD;
surprising that they have seen tourism earnings as a valuable means of&#xD;
augmenting their foreign-exchange earnings. The Belize government made&#xD;
tourism the second priority in its growth strategy in 1984. Dominica, faced&#xD;
with a prospect of the removal of preferential access to the UK market for&#xD;
bananas, is anxious to diversify her economy, and in 1986 declared an official&#xD;
tourism policy based on its natural attractions. Both countries, therefore, also&#xD;
share the common characteristic of coming relatively late on to the international&#xD;
tourism scene. The major difference between the two nations, which&#xD;
will probably dictate future tourism development more than any other&#xD;
factor, is that of access to the North American market. Belize is readily&#xD;
accessible both overland and by air, direct flights only taking two hours from Miami, New Orleans and Houston. Conversely, there are no direct flights to&#xD;
Dominica from either North America or Europe: transits have to be made&#xD;
elsewhere in the Caribbean and schedules sometimes necessitate night stop&#xD;
overs on either Antigua or Barbados, the main connecting points to Dominica.</summary>
    <dc:date>1996-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

