<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Community: .</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/315" />
  <subtitle>.</subtitle>
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/315</id>
  <updated>2026-11-06T14:51:36Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-11-06T14:51:36Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Ryegrass hay versus whole crop silage : effects on milk C18:3 n-3 in Malta</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/150523" />
    <author>
      <name>Attard, Everaldo</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Spiteri, Jorgen</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Pastorelli, Grazia</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/150523</id>
    <updated>2026-10-27T13:34:55Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Ryegrass hay versus whole crop silage : effects on milk C18:3 n-3 in Malta
Authors: Attard, Everaldo; Spiteri, Jorgen; Pastorelli, Grazia
Abstract: Cattle are fed a variety of diets around the globe, primarily depending on the producer and the location.&#xD;
Local whole crop silage and hay are the two major types of feed that farmers in Malta are accustomed to&#xD;
using. Ryegrass, an imported crop that is growing in popularity, is now being used by certain farmers. The&#xD;
goal of this study is to identify the benefits and drawbacks of each type of feed within a certain setting. For&#xD;
this investigation, two farms from which milk samples were obtained were taken into consideration. Farm A&#xD;
cows were fed on whole crop while Farm B relied on ryegrass. Although this was not statistically significant,&#xD;
quantitative analysis revealed that Farm B produced milk with a superior fatty acid profile. Such a study&#xD;
undoubtedly offers new avenues for farmers’ perspectives as well as for producers working with the herding&#xD;
of cattle. This study may be considered to be a pilot study for a more comprehensive investigation into the&#xD;
quality of locally produced fresh fodder and imported fodder that may contribute to the improvement of milk&#xD;
on local farms.</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hepatic lipidosis in dairy cows</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149399" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149399</id>
    <updated>2026-09-25T10:27:07Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Hepatic lipidosis in dairy cows
Abstract: Hepatic lipidosis, which is also recognised as fatty liver syndrome, is one of the most significant &#xD;
metabolic disorders that affects high-production dairy cows during the transition period. This disorder &#xD;
typically starts to develop as the outcome of a negative energy balance that leads to triglyceride &#xD;
buildup in the liver and excessive mobilisation of body fat. This essay is targeted at reviewing the &#xD;
published studies on hepatic lipidosis in dairy cows with a deeper focus on the pathophysiology, risk &#xD;
factors, prevention strategies and diagnostic approaches, while also identifying any gaps that can be &#xD;
found in the current knowledge and any areas that need more research. &#xD;
The employed methodology is a desk study and involves the critical analysis and systematic review &#xD;
of peer-reviewed journal articles, authoritative scientific publications and veterinary textbooks that &#xD;
can be acquired from academic databases like Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus and PubMed. &#xD;
The studies that were collected were thematically analysed and compared in relation to the mechanics &#xD;
of the disease, diagnostic methods, metabolic biomarkers and management practices. &#xD;
This essay has recognised that the main factor that contributes to hepatic lipidosis is a negative energy &#xD;
balance, reduced feed intake, demands for high milk production and excessive body condition scoring &#xD;
all act as major risk factors. Biomarkers in the blood, such as β-hydroxybutyrate and non-esterified &#xD;
fatty acids, are the most commonly used to diagnose, but standardised diagnostic criteria remain &#xD;
insufficient. The publications have indicated consistently that management strategies for prevention, &#xD;
such as maintaining healthy body condition scores and appropriate nutrition for transitioning dairy &#xD;
cows, are more successful than treating the cow after the disease has started. &#xD;
This essay has concluded that hepatic lipidosis is still a substantial challenge in the dairy industry due &#xD;
to its negative effects on productivity, farm profitability and animal health. More in-depth research is &#xD;
required to develop diagnostic tools that are non-invasive and reliable, combine nutritional, &#xD;
management and genetic factors into thorough prevention strategies and create standardised &#xD;
diagnostic thresholds.
Description: Dip. Agric.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The impacts of animal welfare on milk quality and yield</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149397" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149397</id>
    <updated>2026-09-25T10:24:42Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The impacts of animal welfare on milk quality and yield
Abstract: This report explores the relationship between dairy cow welfare, milk yield, milk &#xD;
quality and cow-calf contact systems. Dairy farming has traditionally prioritised &#xD;
productivity, with common practices such as early cow-calf separation being used to &#xD;
maximise saleable milk and improve management efficiency. However, increasing &#xD;
concern for animal welfare has encouraged greater interest in alternative systems &#xD;
that allow cows and calves to maintain physical or partial contact after birth. This &#xD;
report discusses key welfare factors affecting dairy cows, including housing, &#xD;
bedding, nutrition, heat stress, health management, handling and stress. These &#xD;
factors directly influence milk production by affecting feed intake, rumination, &#xD;
immune function, udder health and milk let-down. Poor welfare can contribute to &#xD;
diseases such as mastitis, ketosis, lameness and metritis, all of which may reduce &#xD;
milk yield and alter milk quality. Milk quality is also affected through changes in &#xD;
somatic cell count, bacterial contamination, fat, protein, lactose and overall milk &#xD;
composition. Cow-calf contact systems may improve welfare by allowing natural &#xD;
behaviours such as suckling, grooming, bonding and social learning. However, they &#xD;
also create practical challenges, including reduced saleable milk, the need for &#xD;
adapted housing, hygiene management and careful monitoring of calf and udder &#xD;
health. Overall, this report highlights that animal welfare and productivity should not &#xD;
be viewed as opposing goals. Instead, welfare-conscious dairy systems may support &#xD;
healthier animals, safer milk and more sustainable production when managed &#xD;
appropriately.
Description: Dipl. Agric.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Effects of vegetation and land management on campus soil organic matter</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149369" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149369</id>
    <updated>2026-09-24T10:57:02Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Effects of vegetation and land management on campus soil organic matter
Abstract: Soil organic matter (SOM) is a key indicator of soil quality, influencing nutrient availability, water &#xD;
retention, and overall ecosystem functioning. This study investigated the effects of land &#xD;
management practices and vegetation cover on SOM content in calcareous clay loam soils within &#xD;
the University of Malta campus. Six sites representing different land-use and vegetation treatments &#xD;
were examined: soil under olive trees, Aleppo pine trees, tilled agricultural soil, tilled non&#xD;
agricultural soil, natural vegetation, and a shallow valley site. &#xD;
Soil samples were collected from the upper 20 cm layer and analysed using the Loss on Ignition &#xD;
(LOI) method. Results showed significant differences in SOM among treatments. The highest &#xD;
SOM content was recorded under olive trees (11.98%), followed by Aleppo pines (10.33%), &#xD;
natural vegetation (9.07%), and the shallow valley site (8.22%). Lower SOM levels were observed &#xD;
in tilled non-agricultural soil (6.07%), while the lowest values occurred in tilled agricultural soil &#xD;
(4.96%). Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA confirmed that land use and management &#xD;
practices significantly affected SOM content (P &lt; 0.001). &#xD;
The findings indicate that permanent vegetation cover and minimal soil disturbance promote SOM &#xD;
accumulation through continuous organic inputs and reduced decomposition rates. In contrast, &#xD;
long-term tillage and cultivation accelerate organic matter loss. Although the LOI method may &#xD;
overestimate absolute SOM values in calcareous clay-rich soils, it remains effective for comparing &#xD;
treatments under identical analytical conditions. Overall, the study highlights the importance of &#xD;
vegetation cover and conservation-oriented land management practices in maintaining soil organic &#xD;
matter and improving soil quality in Mediterranean calcareous soils.
Description: Dip. Agric.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

