<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/3203" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/3203</id>
  <updated>2026-08-03T11:33:13Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-03T11:33:13Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Medical sciences in early modern Malta : Giuseppe Demarco on the use and abuse of chocolate in medicine (1760)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148236" />
    <author>
      <name>Gatt, Jurgen R.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148236</id>
    <updated>2026-07-27T07:48:00Z</updated>
    <published>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Medical sciences in early modern Malta : Giuseppe Demarco on the use and abuse of chocolate in medicine (1760)
Authors: Gatt, Jurgen R.
Abstract: Medical Sciences in Early Modern Malta contains a first English translation of Dr. Giuseppe Demarco’s 1760 medical treatise Dissertation on Chocolate as well as related contributions by Charles Savona-Ventura, Charles Cassar, William Zammit, Judge Giovanni Bonello, Maria Giuliana Fenech, and Skye Vassallo. Written by one of Malta’s most voluminous writers and perceptive scholars, Demarco’s Dissertation is a treasure trove of scientific and medical thought current in Malta in the early modern period. This volume, which also features a commentary on the Latin text written by the editor, aims to introduce Dr Giuseppe Demarco (1718-1793) to a modern audience by placing his writings within the broader socio-political, rhetorical, historical, scientific and medical context of early modern Europe.</summary>
    <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do dialogic teaching models always guarantee empowering the student’s voice in classroom dialogue?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/129764" />
    <author>
      <name>Debono, Mark J.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/129764</id>
    <updated>2024-12-10T10:47:11Z</updated>
    <published>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Do dialogic teaching models always guarantee empowering the student’s voice in classroom dialogue?
Authors: Debono, Mark J.
Abstract: This paper challenges the prevailing assumption that dialogic teaching models &#xD;
always guarantee empowering the student’s voice. It shows that the strict &#xD;
adherence of classroom dialogue to the model’s protocol may inhibit the unique &#xD;
expression of students. In the first section, I discuss the aspect that every &#xD;
classroom dialogue is different from the other and, as such, cannot always be &#xD;
perceived as being produced solely from the parameters of dialogic teaching &#xD;
models. To substantiate this argument, I employ Derrida’s analysis of the &#xD;
example as a force that consistently exceeds the boundaries of the exemplary. &#xD;
The second section deals with the issue of how a classroom dialogue can &#xD;
effectively empower the student’s voice using a critical appropriation of the &#xD;
paradigmatic conditions of dialogic teaching. Drawing on Derrida’s concept of &#xD;
ethical responsibility as a process resulting from how we use something for a &#xD;
specific purpose, I point out that adoption and adaptation allow us to be more &#xD;
creative in our use of the protocols of dialogic teaching models for classroom &#xD;
dialogue. The concluding remarks again indicate the complexities of balancing &#xD;
pedagogical strategies between the hegemonic structuring of classroom dialogue &#xD;
from dialogic teaching models and the organic development of students’ voices.</summary>
    <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lessons on knowledge transmission from Plato’s allegory of the cave : the influence of reason and companionship on transmissive and participatory pedagogies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/116591" />
    <author>
      <name>Debono, Mark J.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/116591</id>
    <updated>2024-02-21T11:41:00Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Lessons on knowledge transmission from Plato’s allegory of the cave : the influence of reason and companionship on transmissive and participatory pedagogies
Authors: Debono, Mark J.
Abstract: In this paper, I show the ambiguities in the interpretations of &#xD;
Martin Heidegger and Alain Badiou of Plato’s allegory of the &#xD;
cave as an enlightening educational experience. In &#xD;
Heidegger’s interpretation, knowledge appears as a rational &#xD;
process that corrects the thinking of others. By his claim of an &#xD;
education by truths, Badiou prioritises, again, the Platonic &#xD;
event of knowledge. To indicate the limit of the rational &#xD;
process in these two interpretations of education, &#xD;
I introduce Jan Masschelein’s claim that knowledge transmission in Plato’s cave story can be seen as a process where the &#xD;
immanent experience of companionship comes before the &#xD;
instruction of knowledge. The arguments in this article will &#xD;
be discussed in a broader context that explains how transmissive and participatory pedagogies have been influenced &#xD;
by the view of education as a process of rationality and &#xD;
companionship, and how the various approaches have either &#xD;
constrained or broadened the learner’s perspective.</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Justice in dialogic education : the hegemonic use of “truth” in dialogue and its educational limits</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/116590" />
    <author>
      <name>Debono, Mark J.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/116590</id>
    <updated>2023-12-19T12:58:48Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Justice in dialogic education : the hegemonic use of “truth” in dialogue and its educational limits
Authors: Debono, Mark J.
Abstract: In the opening lines of his Specters of Marx, Jacques Derrida presents the &#xD;
following questions: “Who would learn? From whom? To teach to live, but &#xD;
to whom? Will we ever know how to live and first of all what ‘to learn to live’ &#xD;
means? And why ‘finally’?” (1994, p. xvii). These questions besides giving us &#xD;
an idea about the dialogic nature of the teaching and learning processes, also &#xD;
reveal the complex issue of whether “truth” can be used as a criterion that &#xD;
determines the direction of the exchange of information in a final way. This &#xD;
thematic introduces the main currents of this chapter, which deal with a &#xD;
critique on how excessive authoritative positions of “truth” in dialogue/&#xD;
dialectics can control what others say, where at times such a situation can end &#xD;
up in the worst-case scenario in which others are silenced.</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

