<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/332" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/332</id>
  <updated>2026-06-30T03:44:27Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-30T03:44:27Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Primacy from below?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147672" />
    <author>
      <name>Farrugia, Edward</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147672</id>
    <updated>2026-06-24T10:49:28Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Primacy from below?
Authors: Farrugia, Edward
Abstract: Nowadays, papal primacy is often presented as follows. Popes &#xD;
realise that their office, meant to rally all Christians, actually is the &#xD;
stumbling-block to unity; this was so with Paul VI, and John Paul &#xD;
II even asked Christians to suggest how to create a modern papacy &#xD;
while respecting Christ’s will regarding Church leadership. Francis &#xD;
regrets that all too few concrete suggestions have come in. Turning &#xD;
the model upside down makes the pyramid stand on its head, &#xD;
becoming a funnel, we may say, and serving here as method by &#xD;
letting several strands of a forgotten theme converge. How should a &#xD;
flock meant to follow such an updated model look like? What degree &#xD;
of maturity can one realistically expect from the followers to be able &#xD;
to have a dynamic leader for a pope? [extract]</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Representing the “Christ Diakonos” : a vote for the sacramental diaconate of women in a world Church perspective</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147670" />
    <author>
      <name>Eckholt, Margit</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147670</id>
    <updated>2026-06-24T10:43:07Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Representing the “Christ Diakonos” : a vote for the sacramental diaconate of women in a world Church perspective
Authors: Eckholt, Margit
Abstract: From Würzburg to Frankfurt: The Sacramental Diaconate for &#xD;
Women as a Vote of the Roman-Catholic Church in Germany; With the call to establish the ministry of the permanent diaconate &#xD;
for married, professional men, and as an independent sacramental &#xD;
office with an ordination “unto a ministry of service”, a movement &#xD;
was introduced into the theology of ministry – a movement which &#xD;
is present in the Catholic Church to this day. This “permanent &#xD;
diaconate” is understood – according to the council’s perspective – within the framework of the Church’s sacramental ministry &#xD;
of salvation, as a special representation of the diaconal Christ – &#xD;
the “Christus diakonos”. In times of the council, the question of &#xD;
the diaconate of women was already on the agenda; the German  Catholic women’s associations had gathered “wishes” from female &#xD;
Catholics to the council in preparation for the council, among &#xD;
them the reference to women’s access to the diaconate. The St. &#xD;
Joan’s International Alliance, which was active worldwide and &#xD;
arose in the course of the first women’s movement, sent a petition &#xD;
to the Commission for the Apostolate of the Laity on 27-28 May 1961 &#xD;
asking for the establishment of the diaconate for men and women. [extract]</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>La divinità del Figlio e dello Spirito Santo nei discorsi di Gregorio di Nissa</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147656" />
    <author>
      <name>Farrugia, Jonathan</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147656</id>
    <updated>2026-06-24T08:50:22Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: La divinità del Figlio e dello Spirito Santo nei discorsi di Gregorio di Nissa
Authors: Farrugia, Jonathan
Abstract: Alcune omelie del Nisseno hanno un tema specificamente cristologico (le omelie festive predicate nei giorni di natale e pasqua), una parla dello Spirito santo (l’omelia per la santa Pentecoste) e poi ci sono due omelie che parlano specificamente della divinità della seconda e terza persona della Trinità (l’omelia contro Evagrio sulla divinità dello Spirito, e l’omelia sulla divinità del Figlio e dello Spirito e su Abramo). In questo studio propongo di esaminare il linguaggio su Dio che usa il Nisseno in veste di “vescovo predicatore” per insegnare le congregazioni il mistero della divinità del Figlio e dello Spirito. Il contesto storico di queste omelie sono gli anni c.379-388, un decennio nel quale la controversia intorno alla divinità dello Spirito santo, in modo particolare, è molto forte, quindi uno studio del linguaggio omiletico risulta utile per comprendere meglio come l’insegamento ortodosso venne dato al popolo per chiarire le idee sbagliate che venivano diffuse.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dante and the Ecclesial Paradox : rebuke, reverence, and redemption</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147654" />
    <author>
      <name>Farrugia, Jonathan</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147654</id>
    <updated>2026-06-24T08:42:35Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Dante and the Ecclesial Paradox : rebuke, reverence, and redemption
Authors: Farrugia, Jonathan
Abstract: In the past hundred years, three pontiffs have written apostolic letters to commemorate&#xD;
anniversaries relating to Dante: in 1921, Benedict XV marked the sixth centenary of the&#xD;
death of the great poet; in 1965, Paul VI judged it opportune to write on the occasion&#xD;
of the seventh centenary of his birth; and in 2021, Pope Francis added his voice to the&#xD;
numerous others wishing to honour the memory of the supreme Florentine poet on the&#xD;
seventh centenary of his death. Each letter is a product of its time: one hundred years&#xD;
ago, the Pope—still confined within the Vatican and refusing to recognise the Kingdom of&#xD;
Italy due to the Roman Question—addressed his text “to the beloved sons, professors and&#xD;
pupils of literary institutes and centres of higher learning within the Catholic world”; Paul&#xD;
VI, in full accord with the spirit of the Second Vatican Council and its vision of a Church&#xD;
seeking collaboration with the world, addressed his writing to Dante scholars more broadly,&#xD;
and within the same letter, together with other academic authorities, established the Chair&#xD;
of Dante Studies at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan; Pope Francis&#xD;
today, in his outward-facing style of evangelisation, challenges everyone to (re)read Dante,&#xD;
whose teaching remains relevant seven hundred years after his death. Despite the differing&#xD;
political contexts and ecclesial agendas, Benedict XV, Paul VI, and Pope Francis are united&#xD;
on one point: Dante is a Christian poet—critical of the Church, certainly, but loyal to his&#xD;
faith and desirous of a religious institution that is more serious and less corrupt. This brief&#xD;
study presents the homage which the Church, today, seven centuries later, renders to this&#xD;
Poet—now widely recognised as a passionate witness of an arduous and active faith, in&#xD;
pursuit of justice and freedom.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

