<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/347" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/347</id>
  <updated>2026-08-23T02:35:29Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-23T02:35:29Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Supporting social dialogue in the age of platform work and flexible employment : Malta country report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148399" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148399</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T11:10:24Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Supporting social dialogue in the age of platform work and flexible employment : Malta country report
Abstract: This report examines the nature of platform work and flexible employment in Malta as part of the EU-funded project "Supporting Social Dialogue in the Age of Platform Work and Flexible Employment." Building on previous research, it evaluates the working conditions, multi-dimensional precarity, and operational hardships faced by platform workers—particularly Third-Country Nationals (TCNs)—in the food delivery and passenger transport (Y-Plate) sectors. The report analyzes existing legal frameworks (such as S.L. 452.127), evaluates recent collective bargaining milestones including the landmark GWU–MDFOA collective agreement, and proposes strategic policy recommendations regarding infrastructural improvements, EU directive transposition, capacity building, and enhanced regulatory monitoring and enforcement.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>From imprisonment to reintegration : an analysis of Malta's parole system</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146582" />
    <author>
      <name>Vella, Mary Grace</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146582</id>
    <updated>2026-05-20T08:31:32Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: From imprisonment to reintegration : an analysis of Malta's parole system
Authors: Vella, Mary Grace
Abstract: This article presents an analysis of Malta’s parole system, established through the Restorative Justice Act (2012) as a mechanism for the conditional, pre-expiration release of convicted offenders from incarceration. Rooted in the historical concept of parole d’honneur, parole in its current form constitutes a formal, legally enforceable contract wherein an offender’s early release is contingent upon their strict adherence to stipulated licence conditions. This post-custodial phase mandates community supervision aimed at sustaining the individual’s rehabilitation and reintegration. Parole acts as a crucial transitional mechanism, bridging the gap between total deprivation of liberty and unconditional freedom. Unlike remission, which provides a largely unsupervised and automatic reduction of the custodial sentence (generally at two-thirds of the term), parole is a more discretionary yet advantageous measure requiring the inmate to demonstrate a more proactive engagement to reform and desistance. The system aligns with evolving penal philosophies by extending beyond the purely retributive and incapacitative functions of imprisonment to embrace principles of rehabilitation and restorative justice. The research methodology employs a longitudinal analysis of the Annual Reports of the Malta Parole Board to analyse key operational metrics concerning parole uptake, including the balance between licence grants and refusals, duration of parole licences, offender and offense characteristics, and the standard conditions appended to parole licenses. Furthermore, the study quantifies the system’s effectiveness through its success, suspension, and revocation rates. While recognizing parole’s efficacy in lowering the probability of recidivism through supervised release, the analysis also addresses significant systemic challenges. The paper concludes with evidence-based recommendations for potential reforms and improvements in operational praxis to optimize the system’s impact on public protection and offender reintegration.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Double imprisonment : the trans experience in prison : issues and policy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145083" />
    <author>
      <name>Scicluna, Sandra</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145083</id>
    <updated>2026-03-23T11:18:45Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Double imprisonment : the trans experience in prison : issues and policy
Authors: Scicluna, Sandra
Abstract: The criminal justice system disproportionately affects transgender individuals, who face &#xD;
heightened risks of violence, discrimination, and inadequate healthcare within prisons. This &#xD;
paper investigates the unique challenges transgender prisoners encounter, emphasizing the &#xD;
intersectionality of their experiences with race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, While &#xD;
global data on transgender incarceration rates is limited, studies reveal a higher prevalence of &#xD;
sexual assault and other forms of victimization among transgender inmates compared to the &#xD;
general prison population. The paper aims to analyze these issues and propose reforms, using &#xD;
Malta as a case study for potential solutions. Theoretical frameworks like minority stress theory &#xD;
and intersectionality are employed to understand the complex social and psychological &#xD;
dimensions of transgender prisoners' experiences. Best practice examples related to placement &#xD;
with individuals with the same identity orientation, health access to hormone therapy, &#xD;
addressing trauma – both past and present, training of staff and need research are discussed.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>European norms, policy and practice</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145050" />
    <author>
      <name>Morgenstern, Christine</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Larrauri, Elena</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Bruckmüller, Karin</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Caenazzo, Luciana</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Canton, Rob</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Čepas, Algimantas</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Johnsen, Berit</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Snacken, Sonja</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Mair, George</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Scicluna, Sandra</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Ravagnani, Luisa</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>van Zyl Smit, Dirk</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145050</id>
    <updated>2026-03-20T08:57:54Z</updated>
    <published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: European norms, policy and practice
Authors: Morgenstern, Christine; Larrauri, Elena; Bruckmüller, Karin; Caenazzo, Luciana; Canton, Rob; Čepas, Algimantas; Johnsen, Berit; Snacken, Sonja; Mair, George; Scicluna, Sandra; Ravagnani, Luisa; van Zyl Smit, Dirk
Abstract: We now have evidence that there is a specifically European approach &#xD;
to key aspects of punishment. There is a pan-European rejection of &#xD;
the death penalty, a European approach to prisoners’ rights, and &#xD;
the Committee for the Prevention of Torture as a strong monitoring &#xD;
body, and we also share the idea that imprisonment must be used &#xD;
as  ultima ratio  (van Zyl Smit and Snacken, 2009). What we want to &#xD;
know is whether this approach extends to punishment and supervision enforced  outside  prisons – that is, to community sanctions as &#xD;
sentences and supervision measures before or instead of trial.</summary>
    <dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

