<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/40878" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/40878</id>
  <updated>2026-04-04T23:57:23Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-04T23:57:23Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Casus moralis : de sterilizatione</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/24934" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/24934</id>
    <updated>2020-06-01T12:33:20Z</updated>
    <published>1963-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Casus moralis : de sterilizatione
Abstract: Anna coniux, valde debilitata in sua physica conditione ob fluxum sanguinis excessivum occasione singularum menstruationum everuentem medicum adit consilii capiendi causa. Medicus, sads attente explorato statu physico Annae rumis debili, mulieri infirmae consulit unicum efficax remedium ad vires corporis recuperandas esse ovulatiorus impeditionem ope radiorum a Rontgen nuncupatorurn. Simul autem Annam monet ipsam tali cura in posterum stedlem effectuln iri. Cui medici consilio Anna ob bonum salutis consensum praebet, immo et gaudet quod consequenter a molestiis graviditatis et puerperii liberabitur.</summary>
    <dc:date>1963-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The non-promise narratives in Genesis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/24932" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/24932</id>
    <updated>2017-12-21T02:21:40Z</updated>
    <published>1963-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The non-promise narratives in Genesis
Abstract: In our previous study the promises, together with their corresponding narratives, were examined and were found to be more or less united with their respective setting. It remains now to define more exactly the relation between the promise-narratives and the rest, which provide the background for the whole history. In other words we propose to establish how far one may extend the homogeneous lines disentangled and to see how they were interwined together. This enquiry will be based on the same criteria applied so far.</summary>
    <dc:date>1963-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The site of St. Paul's shipwreck</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/24931" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/24931</id>
    <updated>2018-01-15T07:56:34Z</updated>
    <published>1963-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The site of St. Paul's shipwreck
Abstract: Malta, the Melite of Acts 28, 1 is a biblical land. To write on Malta as a biblical land is to write a commentary on chapter 28 of Acts which tells us the story of St. Paul's shipwreck and his three-month sojourn in the island. But such a commentary has been written over and over again, and it will be both tiresome and unprofitable to repeat what has been already said by others. But for the sake of those who have no access to great commentaries or no leisure to read them I shall give here a brief outline of the story as related by Luke and to bring out the more salient points of the narrative.</summary>
    <dc:date>1963-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Critica 'refutationis idealismi'</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/24930" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/24930</id>
    <updated>2017-12-21T02:21:38Z</updated>
    <published>1963-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Critica 'refutationis idealismi'
Abstract: Cum iam ea exposita sint quae Moore in suo scripto tradit, nostrum est nunc valorem eorum quae ibi traduntur perpendere. In quo autem munere praestando, ipsius Auctoris iudicium in primis considerandum venit. Porro Moore semper suiipsius severissimum criticum egit. Quamvis enim sua Refutatio vix non ab omnibus laudibus extolleretur, ipse tamen eam haud magni faciebat. Cum anno 1922 plura sua scripta in volumine edenda curaret, vix certus erat utrum Refutationem includere deberet. Eam enim eo tempore confusani et erroribus obnoxiam esse putabat. Et si eam includit, hoc veluti solum consultationis gratia fecit, aliis sibi de reimpressionis utilitate elf eo suadentibus quod plures philosophi ad Refutationem allusiones in suis scriptis fecerant. Estne igitur dicen- dum Refutationem, ipso Auctore fatente, nullum valorem habere?</summary>
    <dc:date>1963-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

