<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/41133" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/41133</id>
  <updated>2026-04-21T02:17:37Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-21T02:17:37Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Theology and soteriology : on the relation of theology and ethics</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32730" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32730</id>
    <updated>2018-08-15T01:33:47Z</updated>
    <published>1984-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Theology and soteriology : on the relation of theology and ethics
Abstract: Since the early sixties it has become fashionable in theology to&#xD;
juxtapose theology and soteriology, God'·s existence and his gracious&#xD;
benefits, metaphysics and ethics, science and pietistic individualism and&#xD;
theory and praxis. Critique of "personalism" , "privatization",&#xD;
"ethization" and "dehistorization" are since that time common also III&#xD;
philosophy and sociology. Specifically, the Helsinki accords of the&#xD;
Lutheran World Federation of 1963 argued that contrary to the&#xD;
Reformation's concern with God's grace, contemporary man is primarily&#xD;
concerned with his existence. No longer does man suffer under God's wrath&#xD;
and his own sin and anguishes over how to obtain a gracious God, as did&#xD;
Luther. Modern man is concerned, rather, with the question whether God&#xD;
exists at all. Modern man is not concerned about how his life can be&#xD;
justified, but rather about the absence of God and over the meaninglessness&#xD;
of his life. Whereas for Luther, God's existence was the unquestioned&#xD;
presupposition of the quest for his grace, for contemporary man that very&#xD;
existence has become the principal question.</summary>
    <dc:date>1984-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Theology and mysticism : two fundamental functions of religion</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32709" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32709</id>
    <updated>2018-08-15T01:33:43Z</updated>
    <published>1984-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Theology and mysticism : two fundamental functions of religion
Abstract: In the Introduction to his famous Systematic Theology, Paul Tillich,&#xD;
states that two are the main functions of theology: the function of proclaiming&#xD;
the Word of God and the function of defending it by answering to&#xD;
the needs of a particular culture. He calls the first "kerygmatic function"&#xD;
and the second "apologetic function". Tillich then proves that between&#xD;
these two functions there cannot be any incompatibility or conflict, since&#xD;
they are both necessary to the work of the Church. The two functions are&#xD;
strictly correlated: the proclamation of the Word of God should answer to&#xD;
the needs of a cultural situation, whereas the cultural situation needs to be&#xD;
open to the truths of the Word of God.
Description: A paper read at the World Conference on Religion, held at Miami at the beginning of&#xD;
1983.</summary>
    <dc:date>1984-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Jesus' ministry to the deaf and dumb</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32708" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32708</id>
    <updated>2018-08-15T01:33:31Z</updated>
    <published>1984-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Jesus' ministry to the deaf and dumb
Abstract: It is somewhat difficult for a Scripture scholar to write about Jesus'&#xD;
ministry to the deaf. One source of this difficulty lies in the ambivalence of&#xD;
the Greek language. In many of our English-language Bibles the deaf are&#xD;
specifically mentioned just five times, once in the Gospel of Matthew&#xD;
(Mt 11 :5), three times in the Gospel of Mark (Mk 7 :32, 37; 9:24), and once&#xD;
in the Gospel of Luke (Lk 7:22). Jesus' ministry to the deaf is not cited at all&#xD;
in the Fourth Gospel.</summary>
    <dc:date>1984-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The tractarian understanding of the world as sacrament and symbol</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32695" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32695</id>
    <updated>2021-03-24T09:12:36Z</updated>
    <published>1984-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The tractarian understanding of the world as sacrament and symbol
Abstract: The Oxford Movement (1833 -45) may be seen as a reaction both to&#xD;
eighteenth century rationalism and to the excessive individualism of the&#xD;
Evangelicals. The Tractarians made the discovery that the universe is a&#xD;
symbol of the divine and that redemption is corporate. The Tractarians&#xD;
were romanticists who viewed nature as a parable and as an analogy of the&#xD;
spiritual world. As Francis Oakeley wrote in 1841, "Forms are the expression&#xD;
of the Mind of the Spirit."&#xD;
This essay has three functions some of which overlap. First, there will&#xD;
be an exposition of the Tractarian understanding of the world as symbol!&#xD;
sacrament. This will include, inter alia, a discussion of the famous sacramental&#xD;
principle. Second, an attempt will be made to trace the sources of&#xD;
the Tractarian view of the world in 1) Scripture; 2) the Alexandrian doctrine&#xD;
of the oikonomia; and 3) Bishop Butler's doctrine of analogy. It seems&#xD;
significant to me, for example, that Butler commences his famous work on&#xD;
analogy with a quotation from Origen, who saw the cosmos as pervaded by&#xD;
symbols and types of the invisible world. Third, the final section will&#xD;
contain a critical assessment of the Tractarian understanding of the world.</summary>
    <dc:date>1984-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

