<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/41402" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/41402</id>
  <updated>2026-04-13T09:31:01Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-13T09:31:01Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Hegel's Encyclopedia of 1830 §§ 40-51 : an exegesis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36470" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36470</id>
    <updated>2018-11-23T02:24:54Z</updated>
    <published>1991-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Hegel's Encyclopedia of 1830 §§ 40-51 : an exegesis
Abstract: This paper moves in three stages. In the first stage the relation of the 1830 Encyclopedia to Hegel's early writings is examined. In the second stage the author discusses the origin of this important work of Hegel. In the third stage (to appear in the next issue of Melita Theologica) the author offers an exegesis of §§40-51 of the Encyclopedia of 1830.</summary>
    <dc:date>1991-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Book reviews [Melita Theologica, 42(1)]</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36469" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36469</id>
    <updated>2018-11-23T02:24:52Z</updated>
    <published>1991-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Book reviews [Melita Theologica, 42(1)]
Abstract: Francis I. ANDERSEN/David N. FREEDMAN, Amos. A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (Anchor Bible 24A; New York 1989) XLII.979pp.</summary>
    <dc:date>1991-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The museum as an audio-visual cultural centre</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36468" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36468</id>
    <updated>2018-11-23T02:24:49Z</updated>
    <published>1991-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The museum as an audio-visual cultural centre
Abstract: An interview by Dr. Francis Cachia with Dr. Rainier Budde, Director of Wallraf-Richartz-Museum, Dr. Sigfried Gohr, Director of Museum Ludwig, and Mr. Franz Xaver Ohnesorg, Director of the Cologne Philharmonic.</summary>
    <dc:date>1991-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Marriage as a sacrament : a theology in transition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36467" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36467</id>
    <updated>2018-11-23T02:24:48Z</updated>
    <published>1991-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Marriage as a sacrament : a theology in transition
Abstract: The theology of marriage as sacrament seems to be in a crucial period of transition. Catholic theology has gradually moved from the highly legalistic position of the medieval and Tridentine period to the more personalistic perspective of Vatican It Still, the current thinking seems to be often a blending of traditional and contemporary insights, resulting in a theological perspective that has severe limitations. Those engaged in teaching often find it difficult to deal with the theology of marriage in a manner that is compatible with contemporary experience. Those involved in canonical and pastoral work also find that the current theological thinking does not allow them to deal adequately with modern marital dilemmas. As a result, discussion of marriage as a sacrament is often left a moot question. What Ralmer pointed out some years ago is still true: with all the discussion about marriage in our time, little attention is paid to the crucial sacramental dimension. In light of all this, I would agree with Orsy that the time has come to look for newinsights, new categories and broader horizons in our considerations of marriage as a sacrarhent. In this article I would like to focus on some of the key factors that are coming into play in this reformulation of a sacramental theology of marriage. These factors are as follows: 1) the dynamic nature of marriage; 2) the integration of the secular and sacred dimensions of marriage; 3) the centrality of love, especially romantic love in today's marriages; 4) the relational and inclusive view of faith; 5) the growing'linkage between ministry and marriage; and 6) the effect of liberation themes of sexism, oppression and social justice on marriage.</summary>
    <dc:date>1991-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

