<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46157" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46157</id>
  <updated>2026-06-25T06:08:30Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-25T06:08:30Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>The Malta turn of Europe - the European Union in the age of globality</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46163" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46163</id>
    <updated>2019-09-01T05:09:02Z</updated>
    <published>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The Malta turn of Europe - the European Union in the age of globality
Abstract: Victor Hugo once described revolutions as a return from the artificial to normalcy. Certainly,&#xD;
revolutions are processes that unveil the unknown in history. Revolutions are revelations. 1989 was&#xD;
such a revelation in Europe. It changed the European perspective from Yalta to Malta, that is: from&#xD;
internal division to global exposure. The turn from Yalta to Malta was not only a semantic gag. It&#xD;
was also more than describing the end of the Cold War. To link Malta to Yalta was not a nice way&#xD;
for writing an obituary to a closed chapter in history. To the contrary, “Malta” opened a new chapter&#xD;
in the history of Europe. I call this fundamental fact “the Malta turn of Europe”. Most people which&#xD;
were living the political events of 1989 or were observing them from a distance did not instantly&#xD;
grasp the meaning of the political changes that happened across Central Europe. Two basic meanings&#xD;
were revealed by the history of 1989: a fundamental geopolitical change and a fundamental sociocultural&#xD;
change – and both were fundamentally interrelated. The fall of communist regimes that had&#xD;
been governing many societies was met with excitement and joy, sometimes even with disbelief and&#xD;
worry across the world. With hindsight knowledge, two facts remain evident: 1989 did not begin in&#xD;
1989 and it did not end with 1989. When we compare the fall of communist regimes in Europe with&#xD;
the French Revolution of 1789, we instantly realize the meaning of this thought: also 1789 did not&#xD;
begin in 1789 and it did not end with 1789. The French Revolution in its time went through periods&#xD;
of incubation. And it continued through several periods of transformation, of revolutions inside the&#xD;
revolution, of unexpected results and unintended consequences. The same was happening in Europe&#xD;
again two centuries later. Three insights remain fundamental to better contextualize 1989 and the&#xD;
Malta summit in that year that declared the Cold War dead.</summary>
    <dc:date>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

