<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/54294" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/54294</id>
  <updated>2026-04-23T02:26:41Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-23T02:26:41Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>The association between foot posture and lower leg and foot injuries in long-distance runners.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/54684" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/54684</id>
    <updated>2020-11-15T07:02:26Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The association between foot posture and lower leg and foot injuries in long-distance runners.
Abstract: Objective&#xD;
&#xD;
Lower leg and foot injuries in long-distance runners are commonly associated with foot&#xD;
morphology although other extrinsic factors may be implicated. The purpose of this study&#xD;
was to determine if there is any association between foot posture and lower leg and foot&#xD;
injuries in Maltese long-distance runners.&#xD;
&#xD;
Research Method&#xD;
&#xD;
30 non-recreational long-distance runners, following a regular schedule by running 25 km&#xD;
every week or more, and had previously sustained at least one lower leg injury, participated&#xD;
in a quantitative, retrospective, cross-sectional study.&#xD;
The Foot Posture Index, FPI-6, was used to classify the foot type, i.e. neutral, pronated,&#xD;
(low-arched), or supinated, (high-arched). Each participant was asked to fill in a&#xD;
questionnaire, designed to obtain specific information about the type and nature of injury,&#xD;
influencing factors and other basic data. For the purpose of this study the lower leg and the&#xD;
foot were divided in 4 sites, namely, the forefoot, rearfoot, lower leg and knee. Descriptive&#xD;
and statistical analysis were both used to point out any association between foot posture and&#xD;
lower leg and foot injury patterns in long-distance runners.&#xD;
&#xD;
Results&#xD;
&#xD;
The results of this study show that although there is no direct association between foot&#xD;
posture and lower leg and foot injuries, the effect of static foot posture can be injury&#xD;
specific. The most common site of injury was the rearfoot, (54.1 %), followed by the knee,&#xD;
(21.6%), the lower leg, (16.2%) and the forefoot, (8.1%). Low-arched runners reported a&#xD;
greater incidence of plantar rearfoot and anterior knee injuries, while high-arched runners&#xD;
complained more from lateral injuries such as lateral ankle pain and lateral knee pain. 14&#xD;
out of the 37 injuries were reported by runners exhibiting a neutral foot structure. However&#xD;
in the latter group, the reported injuries were distributed more evenly between the 4 sites,&#xD;
with most of the athletes complaining from mild pain in contrast with the moderate to&#xD;
severe pain reported by both the low-arched and high-arched participants.&#xD;
&#xD;
Conclusion&#xD;
&#xD;
The results of the current study are consistent with previous studies and confirm that the&#xD;
nature and pattern of injuries in long-distance running is multi-factorial. It is evident that&#xD;
while foot type predisposes the runners to injury, the onset can be facilitated by extrinsic&#xD;
factors.&#xD;
In conclusion, understanding the association between different foot types and injury&#xD;
patterns is very relevant in clinical practice because this will certainly facilitate and&#xD;
improve treatment strategies when addressing running injuries.
Description: B.SC.(HONS)PODIATRY</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An exploratory study of student satisfaction in podiatry degree programs in Malta.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/54635" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/54635</id>
    <updated>2020-11-13T17:07:08Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: An exploratory study of student satisfaction in podiatry degree programs in Malta.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE&#xD;
&#xD;
The aim of this study is to explore student satisfaction amongst students&#xD;
currently reading their BSc Podiatry course inside the Institute of Healthcare in&#xD;
the University of Malta.&#xD;
&#xD;
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD&#xD;
&#xD;
An exploratory quantitative study was conducted on 19 Maltese BSc Podiatry&#xD;
students registered with the University of Malta. Upon consent each student was&#xD;
given an NSS/SSS questionnaire to answer and return anonymously to the&#xD;
secretary of the Podiatry Department.&#xD;
&#xD;
RESULTS&#xD;
&#xD;
The study's findings have concluded that current Podiatry students inside the&#xD;
University of Malta are satisfied (P=0.001) with the course program. More over,&#xD;
this study highlighted the fact that fourth year students seemed to be more&#xD;
satisfied with the course than the third year students. Males were more satisfied&#xD;
than females and age was not significant towards student satisfaction.&#xD;
&#xD;
CONCLUSIONS&#xD;
&#xD;
The results of this study demonstrated that students are overall satisfied with the&#xD;
BSc Podiatry course currently running inside the University of Malta. However,&#xD;
mean scores have demonstrated that in a few course aspects students are less&#xD;
satisfied with the current provision. The results of this study will be&#xD;
disseminated to the Podiatry school inside the University of Malta in which this&#xD;
study took place and recommendations for practice will be suggested. It is hoped&#xD;
that following these suggestions, improvements to the course will be made&#xD;
where necessary to enhance student satisfaction.
Description: B.SC.(HONS)PODIATRY</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A comparison of forefoot pressures in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients and non-rheumatic subjects in Malta.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/54613" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/54613</id>
    <updated>2020-11-15T07:02:30Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A comparison of forefoot pressures in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients and non-rheumatic subjects in Malta.
Abstract: Purpose of the study&#xD;
&#xD;
The objective of this study is to assess peak plantar pressures in the forefoot region of&#xD;
patients with newly diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) as compared to Non-Rheumatoid Arthritis participants from the general population in Malta.&#xD;
&#xD;
Research design and method&#xD;
&#xD;
A quasi-experimental unmatched study was conducted in the Podiatry Department at&#xD;
Birkirkara Health Centre. Ten Rheumatoid Arthritis participants were selected from the&#xD;
Rheumatology Clinic at Mater Dei Hospital. The other ten participants were selected from&#xD;
the general population. Participants were recruited during the period commencing June&#xD;
2008 and ending October 2008. Each group consisted of seven females and three males&#xD;
between the ages of 30 to 55 years. Every RA participant was matched for age, gender and&#xD;
weight to another participant from the general population. This was done to exclude any&#xD;
known external factors that could influence the peak plantar pressure results recorded. All&#xD;
participants recruited were asked to attend the Podiatry Department at Birkirkara Health&#xD;
Centre for pressure measurement using the HR Mat® system. Prior data collection all&#xD;
participants were weighed using a digital portable scale and the result was used to&#xD;
calibrate the pressure mat. Any hyperkeratotic lesions present were debrided so as not to&#xD;
increase the pressure recorded. Peak pressure data was only recorded for the participant's&#xD;
dominant foot using the two step protocol. A period of acclimatization was given to all&#xD;
participants so to adapt well to the environment prior data collection. The forefoot was&#xD;
divided into specific regions which were the Hallux, 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MPJ),&#xD;
2nd_4th MPJs and the fifth MPJ for peak plantar pressure measurement. From the recorded&#xD;
data five trials of each foot mask were selected by the researcher on basis of best practice&#xD;
data selection.&#xD;
&#xD;
Results and conclusions&#xD;
&#xD;
From the collected data it was found that there was no significant difference (p-value 0.05)&#xD;
in peak plantar pressure at the Hallux region between the RA and the Non-RA groups.&#xD;
However, there was statistical difference (p-value 0.05) in all the other regions. The RA&#xD;
group had higher significance pressure underneath the 1st and 2nd- 4th MP J regions whilst&#xD;
the Non-RA had higher peak pressures (p-value 0.05) underneath the 5th MPJ. The results&#xD;
showed that even at an early stage of RA, forefoot pressures are shifted towards the&#xD;
medial MPJs. This pressure distribution is not due to a compensatory process to pain as all&#xD;
participants confirmed to be pain free during the study. This implies that early podiatric&#xD;
management for the increased medial forefoot pressures should be considered. The need&#xD;
for regular foot pressure monitoring and assessment was also highlighted as these give&#xD;
valuable insight in disease progression. Need for further research is recommended to&#xD;
investigate the same patients over an adequate period to determine pressure distribution&#xD;
during RA progression.
Description: B.SC.(HONS)PODIATRY</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patient satisfaction with podiatry care offered in health centre in Malta.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/54579" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/54579</id>
    <updated>2020-11-13T16:52:25Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Patient satisfaction with podiatry care offered in health centre in Malta.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE&#xD;
The objective of this study is to identify patient's views and opinions about the&#xD;
current podiatry service offered in the Maltese National health Service and to&#xD;
determine whether there is a difference in patients' views and opinion amongst the&#xD;
8 different podiatry clinics across the Maltese Island.&#xD;
&#xD;
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD&#xD;
An exploratory quantitative study was conducted on 80 Maltese subjects who had&#xD;
been attending podiatry services offered by the Maltese Primary Health Care&#xD;
System for at least one year. 10 subjects were randomly selected from each of the&#xD;
eight Health Centres (HC) in Malta, which included Birkirkara HC, Cospiqua HC,&#xD;
Floriana HC, Gzira HC, Mosta HC, Paola HC, Qormi HC and Rabat HC from&#xD;
August 2008 to December 2008. Each of the participants was interviewed once&#xD;
during this study. The 'Bassetlaw (NHS) Primary Care Trust Patient Satisfaction&#xD;
Survey' was used to explore patient satisfaction.&#xD;
&#xD;
RESULTS&#xD;
The study's findings have concluded that Maltese patients visiting the podiatry&#xD;
NHS clinics are overall satisfied with the current service rendered to them (P&#xD;
0.000). However further statistical analysis has demonstrated a statistical&#xD;
difference between clinics in patient satisfaction with some aspects of podiatric&#xD;
care and management. Variation in patient satisfaction between clinics was shown&#xD;
for the ease of contacting the podiatry department by telephone (P 0.000), the&#xD;
quality of the phone service and telephone staff (P 0.000), the appointment&#xD;
booking system (P 0.000), quality of care given by the podiatrist (P 0.001),&#xD;
amount of time the podiatrist spends with patients (P 0.000), podiatrist's patience&#xD;
regarding patients' questions or worries (P 0.015), the podiatrist's explanation of&#xD;
patient treatment (P 0.008), and regarding advice given to patients about&#xD;
improving their foot health (P 0.000).&#xD;
CONCLUSIONS&#xD;
This study has indicated an overall satisfaction with current podiatry service in&#xD;
Malta. This study has also indicated that Maltese patients differ in opinion&#xD;
regarding different aspects and the level of service rendered to them in the 8&#xD;
podiatry clinics around Malta. Results demonstrated that although the 8 clinics are&#xD;
under the same management, different quality levels of care were obtained from&#xD;
individual podiatry clinics. Further research in diverse settings such as in private&#xD;
clinics and private hospitals where populations may differ from the one stncliecl&#xD;
here may yield further information as to patient's perception with podiatric&#xD;
services in Malta.
Description: B.SC.(HONS)PODIATRY</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

