<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/63340" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/63340</id>
  <updated>2026-04-20T23:27:13Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-20T23:27:13Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>A comparison of organisational culture in two mental health rehabilitation facilities in Malta.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/43926" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/43926</id>
    <updated>2020-11-04T07:29:41Z</updated>
    <published>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A comparison of organisational culture in two mental health rehabilitation facilities in Malta.
Abstract: The purpose of this study is 10 compare the organisational culture of two&#xD;
rehabilitation facilities in the Maltese mental health care sector, namely, the Half-Way&#xD;
House in Mount Carmel Hospital (Attard) and Villa Chelsea in Birkirkara. The main&#xD;
proposition in this study is that, the different levels of functioning and management&#xD;
effectiveness are largely a function of the different organisational culture. Culture is&#xD;
defined in this study as the quality of perceived values, norms, beliefs and practices&#xD;
shared by managers and employees.&#xD;
To investigate the above, the study employed a triangulation design, comprising of&#xD;
both qualitative and quantitative assessment. Culture was assessed by questionnaires&#xD;
and observation ratings. The results were evaluated in the light of performance and&#xD;
attitude outcomes, as well as, management explanations on typical perceived cultural&#xD;
dimensions. The sample comprised all staff and management who participated in one&#xD;
or more assessment exercises.&#xD;
Results show that while both sites are theoretically aiming in the same organisational&#xD;
direction, there are differences between the sites, as well as, some incompatibilities&#xD;
within sites. These findings are discussed with reference to practical implications&#xD;
emerging from the results, and are compared and contrasted with the literature review&#xD;
and research findings. Recommendations and limitations are also elaborated upon.
Description: M.SC.HEALTH SERVICES MANGT.</summary>
    <dc:date>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

