OAR@UM Collection:https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/84422026-04-12T10:13:30Z2026-04-12T10:13:30ZThe association between baseline characteristics and the outcome of foot ulceration in a Maltese population with diabeteshttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/86232017-07-20T09:55:01Z2015-01-01T00:00:00ZTitle: The association between baseline characteristics and the outcome of foot ulceration in a Maltese population with diabetes
Abstract: AIM:
To determine patient and ulcer characteristics which predict wound healing in patients living
with diabetes.
METHODS:
A prospective observational study was conducted on 100 subjects presenting with a diabetic
foot ulceration. Patient and ulcer characteristics were recorded. Patients were followed up to
a maximum of 1 year.
RESULTS:
After 1 year of follow-up, ulcer characteristics were more predictive of ulcer healing than
patient characteristics. Seventy-seven per cent of ulcers healed and 23% had not healed.
Independent predictors of non-healing were ulcer stage (p=0.003), presence of biofilm
(p=0.020), presence of infection (p=0.022) and ulcer depth (p=0.028) in the study group.
Although this study demonstrated that the baseline HBA1c reading at the start of the study
was not a significant predictor of foot ulcer outcome [p=0.603, resolved vs. amputated],
however upon further statistical analyses, when HbA1c was compared to the time taken for
complete ulcer healing [n=77], it proved to be significant [p=0.009].
CONCLUSION:
The factors influencing healing are ulcer stage, presence of biofilm and ulcer depth. These
findings have important implications for clinical practice especially in an out-patient setting.
Prediction of outcome may be helpful for healthcare professionals in individualizing and
optimizing clinical assessment and management of patients. Identification of determinants of
outcome could result in improved health outcomes, improved quality of life and lesser
diabetes related foot complications.
Description: M.SC.PODIATRY2015-01-01T00:00:00ZAn investigation of the relationship between a static diagnosis of ankle equinus and dynamic function of the ankle jointhttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/86222016-09-28T09:07:02Z2015-01-01T00:00:00ZTitle: An investigation of the relationship between a static diagnosis of ankle equinus and dynamic function of the ankle joint
Abstract: is characterised by a limited ankle joint range of motion which is usually caused by
the contracture of the triceps surea muscle group. There are numerous definitions and
techniques to diagnose ankle equinus. A commonly used examination utilised in a clinical
setting is as described by Root et al., (1977) where passive ankle joint dorsiflexion is
examined using a hand held goniometer. Several studies have proven this to be unreliable.
Unfortunately literature has failed to correlate static examinations of the ankle joint with its
dynamic motion.
Aim: The aim of this research was to investigate whether there is a relationship between the
static diagnosis of ankle equinus and the dynamic motion of the ankle joint.
Research Design and Method: A quantitative non-experimental same subject research
design was employed in this study. Twenty participants with a mean age of 34 years were
divided into two equal groups which were of normal (0 to +5) or pronated (+6 to +10)
foot type, using the foot posture index. The static examination was then carried out using a
fixed goniometer, following which they were divided into two categories of ‘between
-5 to 0 degrees’ or ‘less than -5 degrees’ of ankle equinus. Dynamic examination was
then carried out using a 3D optoelectronic capture system where markers were placed
according to the Rizzoli foot model. An average of the maximum dynamic ankle joint and
foot dorsiflexion was taken.
Results: No relationship was found between static examination findings and dynamic motion
of ankle joint dorsiflexion. 66.7% of participants in the ‘between -5 to 0 degrees’ category
had more than 10 degrees of ankle joint motion during gait. On the other hand in the 'less
than -5 degrees' of static ankle equinus, all of the individuals had less than 10 degrees of
dynamic ankle joint dorsiflexion but there was still an increase of average dynamic
motion. Similar results were obtained in the dynamic foot dorsiflexion, where a marginal
increase in dynamic ankle joint dorsiflexion was observed which was attributed to the
midtarsal joint dorsiflexion. Also, a significant relationship between gender and dynamic
ankle and foot motion was noted, as the female population had a higher degree of ankle joint
range of motion than males.
Conclusion: There was no significant correlation between the static diagnosis of ankle
equinus and the dynamic motion of the ankle joint in the category of 'between -5 to 0
degrees'. This indicates that the technique as explained by Root theory is not enough to
classify an individual as having ankle equinus. This implies that clinicians should carry
out a dynamic examination to confirm diagnosis of ankle equinus. However, in the
category of 'less than -5 degrees' of ankle equinus, the participants had less than 10 degrees
of ankle joint dorsiflexion. Therefore, although there is no correlation between the two,
dynamic ankle equinus was still present. This may also suggest that a standard definition
of ankle equinus may be that of having less than -5 degrees of static ankle equinus.
Description: B.SC.(HONS)PODIATRY2015-01-01T00:00:00Z