<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/86531" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/86531</id>
  <updated>2026-04-15T04:25:43Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-15T04:25:43Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Programming obligations of European agencies :  an effective instrument for the European Commission to exercise control?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/95274" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/95274</id>
    <updated>2022-05-09T09:35:12Z</updated>
    <published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Programming obligations of European agencies :  an effective instrument for the European Commission to exercise control?
Abstract: The prevailing view in academic literature highlights the independence of European&#xD;
agencies as the rationale for their creation. Contrary to this perception, this work&#xD;
demonstrates that the Commission exercises considerable control through its&#xD;
opinions on an agency´s Single Programming Document.&#xD;
Being part of the budgetary procedure, European agencies are obliged to draw up a&#xD;
`Single Programming Document` comprising an annual and multiannual work&#xD;
programme together with corresponding planning of human and financial resources.&#xD;
Based upon performance-budgeting principles, the Framework Financial Regulation&#xD;
(FFR) hereby sets out detailed rules on the programming procedure and defines the&#xD;
Commission´s role in this respect. Apart from proposing the number of contributions&#xD;
from the EU budget, the Commission has the competence to give its opinion on an&#xD;
agency´s draft single programming document. To examine the Commission´s exercise&#xD;
of control, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) and the European&#xD;
Chemicals Agency (ECHA) were part of the case study. For both agencies, the draft&#xD;
single programming documents for the years 2019-2021 were analysed and&#xD;
compared with their final programming version. It was noticed that the Commission´s&#xD;
comments frequently appear as instructions rather than recommendations and that&#xD;
the majority of their requests were observed by the agency.&#xD;
To establish the Commission´s role in a broader context, its opinions are analysed in&#xD;
terms of their content and quality of comments. Hereby, it is noticed that the&#xD;
Commission´s role depends on external factors and is thus a flexible one. Acting&#xD;
mainly as a legal supervisor, the Commission also addresses efficiency-related aspects&#xD;
and ensuresthat policy directions are properly considered in the programme. Several&#xD;
instances are noted where the Commission pursues its own interests that are outside&#xD;
the scope of the programme procedure. Even though, it exercises considerable&#xD;
powers over an agency´s programming content, the relationship between the&#xD;
Commission and European agencies is not yet comparable with ministry-agency&#xD;
constellations found at the nation-state level.&#xD;
Nevertheless, it is regarded that the Commission transgresses its competences as its&#xD;
opinions go beyond the limited scope of the Framework Financial Regulation. Possible&#xD;
legislative improvements are discussed in the last chapter of this work. It concludes&#xD;
that the Treaties lack an appropriate basis for the adoption of secondary legislation&#xD;
that regulates the programming procedure comprehensively. Therefore, Treaty&#xD;
amendments are required in addition to secondary EU legislation that sanctions&#xD;
today´s programming practice. Suggestions for legislative proposals are made to this&#xD;
end.
Description: Ph.D.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The cardinal rights pertaining to a suspect or accused person prior to the making of a confession : with special reference to Malta</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/95177" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/95177</id>
    <updated>2022-05-06T10:00:44Z</updated>
    <published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The cardinal rights pertaining to a suspect or accused person prior to the making of a confession : with special reference to Malta
Abstract: This thesis examines whether the following four cardinal rights, namely, the right to legal&#xD;
assistance, right to legal aid, the right to information and the right to silence are exhaustive&#xD;
and whether they are applied in a manner which reflects the spirit of EU law. Prior to&#xD;
delving into each individual right, the author will define certain keywords used throughout&#xD;
the thesis with the aim of establishing uniform definitions applicable to each individual&#xD;
right. The central question of this thesis is whether these four chosen cardinal rights are&#xD;
absolute rights or whether they have limited application. Focus is placed on the Maltese&#xD;
legal position. Whether it is in line with other European Member States in the&#xD;
implementation of such rights or whether it lags far behind. In so doing, the study outlines&#xD;
whether the intention of the legislator in promulgating these laws by transposing EU&#xD;
Directives is truly reflected in the court judgments which are delivered. This thesis&#xD;
incorporates vast references to relevant judgments delivered by the Maltese courts and&#xD;
includes a comparison of the same with judgments delivered by the ECtHR and the ECJ.&#xD;
In the case of contrasting decisions, the author highlights the differences and examines&#xD;
whether the decision is the result of a wrong or restrictive interpretation on the part of the&#xD;
Maltese courts. The study aims to show that these four cardinal rights established in the&#xD;
EU Directives only provide minimum standards and that there are several jurisdictions&#xD;
including Malta which provide more fundamental guarantees. The study questions&#xD;
whether the four chosen rights have in fact facilitated investigations or whether they&#xD;
served to complicate matters in this regard. Paramount importance is given to the fact that&#xD;
these rights as outlined in the letter of rights must be made known to a suspect prior to the&#xD;
commencement of any investigation by a police officer or any judicial authority. If these&#xD;
rights are afforded to suspects at the early stages, this would guarantee a fair trial in the&#xD;
criminal process and reduce the possibility of violations of rights. So far, Malta has&#xD;
transposed all the EU Directive relating to three of these cardinal rights, although it is&#xD;
currently facing infringement proceedings about the right to legal aid. Once the EU&#xD;
Directive on legal aid is transposed into national legislation, there will be an overhaul in&#xD;
the application of this right. Currently, the right to legal aid is available to every person&#xD;
on the island. There is no merits or means testing. In fact, it may be stated that this right&#xD;
is often abused to the detriment of those suspects and accused persons who require legal&#xD;
assistance and cannot afford to pay for such assistance. The harmonisation of these rights&#xD;
in Member States ensures that citizens of the European Union are treated, in the same&#xD;
way, irrespective of which country they happen to be in when faced with a criminal&#xD;
investigation. In its conclusion, the study highlights certain areas which need&#xD;
improvement by putting forward adequate recommendations to ensure that the right to a&#xD;
fair hearing is properly safeguarded.
Description: Ph.D.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The harm-benefit analysis : an overview of project evaluation in terms of the EU directive on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes  </title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/89843" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/89843</id>
    <updated>2022-02-25T08:08:59Z</updated>
    <published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The harm-benefit analysis : an overview of project evaluation in terms of the EU directive on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes  
Abstract: Directive 2010/63/EU was introduced in 2010 following a widescale dissatisfaction with&#xD;
Directive 86/609/EEC, with the intention of ensuring the efficient functioning of the EU&#xD;
internal market and enhancing competitiveness and innovation of the EU research&#xD;
industry by means of the creation of a level playing field, ensuring high standards of&#xD;
welfare for animals still bred and used for scientific purposes and to improve&#xD;
transparency to the general public on the use of live animals for scientific purposes&#xD;
within the EU. Amongst its many innovations, potentially the largest and most important&#xD;
was the introduction of the requirement of project evaluation and authorisation, by&#xD;
means of which the Directive is able to implement its objectives.&#xD;
The focus of this study is to provide an overview of project evaluation under Article 38&#xD;
of Directive 2010/63/EU. This dissertation further outlines the objectives of this&#xD;
Directive, with particular reference to that of the preservation of the Three Rs Principle.&#xD;
This dissertation also contains an in-depth analysis of the project evaluation process&#xD;
under Directive 2010/63/EU and the manner in which the Harm-Benefit Analysis (HBA)&#xD;
is to be carried out. Using Malta as a case-study, this dissertation also discusses the&#xD;
implementation of the HBA within a domestic context and contains a critical analysis of&#xD;
the Maltese legal framework. This study contains a critical analysis of the HBA as a&#xD;
method for project evaluation, highlighting its many shortcoming and provides&#xD;
proposals by means of which project evaluation under Directive 2010/63/EU may be&#xD;
better suited for achieving its objectives.
Description: LL.B.(Hons)(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What effects did the Gender-Based Violence and Domestic Violence Act of 2018 have on Maltese court judgements?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/89780" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/89780</id>
    <updated>2022-02-24T06:59:21Z</updated>
    <published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: What effects did the Gender-Based Violence and Domestic Violence Act of 2018 have on Maltese court judgements?
Abstract: The crime of domestic violence has been on the increase during the last few years, ranking up&#xD;
as the third most committed crime in Malta. In 2018, Malta ratified the Council of Europe&#xD;
Convention on Preventing and Combatting Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence,&#xD;
otherwise known as the Istanbul Convention, leading to the adoption of the Gender-Based&#xD;
Violence and Domestic Violence Act aimed at combatting the problem of domestic violence&#xD;
and repealing the Domestic Violence Act of 2005. Reports show that often, victims of&#xD;
domestic violence withdraw their initial complaint. Therefore, this study will analyse reasons&#xD;
why Maltese courts dismiss certain domestic violence cases, to better understand why victims&#xD;
withdraw their complaint.&#xD;
The adoption of the Gender-Based Violence and Domestic Violence Act brought forward&#xD;
amendments to the Criminal Code and the Civil Code, enforcing harsher penalties to acts of&#xD;
domestic violence as well as ensuring the protection of victims of such crime. This study&#xD;
compares Maltese judgements delivered before the implementation of the Gender-Based&#xD;
Violence and Domestic Violence Act of 2018 with judgements delivered after the&#xD;
implementation of the Act of 2018. This comparison will be made with the aim to analyse&#xD;
whether the amendments brought forward by the implementation of the Act has been put&#xD;
into practice and its impact on the Maltese Courts.
Description: LL.B.(Hons)(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

