<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/86971" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/86971</id>
  <updated>2026-04-07T14:59:23Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-07T14:59:23Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Extended teleparallel cosmology</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/101446" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/101446</id>
    <updated>2022-09-06T05:58:32Z</updated>
    <published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Extended teleparallel cosmology
Abstract: Over the last 100 years General Relativity (GR) has been an extremely successful theory&#xD;
of gravity and also considered as a fundamental theory. GR has been extensively used to&#xD;
study the Universe, however it turned out that it is not a complete theory as more observations were available. This resulted in GR not being able to explain Dark Energy (DE)&#xD;
and Dark Matter (DM), assuming that these are the missing components in explaining the&#xD;
late time cosmology. Incorporating DE and cold DM into GR, the ΛCDM model was&#xD;
created that solved most of observational cosmological problems. So far, DE and DM although kind of natural hypotheses, are not globally accepted concepts and have not been&#xD;
directly observed. On top of that there is a new sector of cosmology called gravitational&#xD;
wave astronomy which is based on the dynamics of gravitational waves and the plethora&#xD;
of relevant datasets that can be immediately used to constrain gravitational models. All&#xD;
the aforementioned problems serve only part of the reasons that lead to modify GR. The&#xD;
process of modifying GR is not that simple. At times this can lead to solving problems&#xD;
but also creating new ones. As such in depth studies of these modified theories must be&#xD;
always performed. From these studies a lot of useful insights were gained regarding the&#xD;
foundations and cosmology of GR. It should be noted that Einstein himself first modified&#xD;
GR in an attempt to unify electromagnetism with gravity via torsion by setting curvature&#xD;
to zero. This is exactly the birth of teleparallel theories of gravity (TG). In this thesis,&#xD;
the TG framework is introduced starting from its motivation to its technical details and&#xD;
how to modify it. Moreover, the teleparallel analogue of Horndeski theory is presented&#xD;
and probed against multimessenger events of GW170817 [5] and GRB170817A [6]. Its&#xD;
polarization modes and degrees of freedom are also extensively studied and compared&#xD;
with Horndeski theory. In this direction the f(T, B) gravity is also probed against the&#xD;
multimessenger events and in general studied perturbatively in the cosmological background.         &#xD;
Finally, a version of a teleparallel equivalent of the generalised Proca theories is&#xD;
constructed and its Friedmann equations are calculated as a first application to cosmology.
Description: Ph.D.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Observational constraints on beyond general relativity models</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/89924" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/89924</id>
    <updated>2022-03-01T06:25:57Z</updated>
    <published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Observational constraints on beyond general relativity models
Abstract: This study consists of a detailed analysis of the impact of Hubble constant prior values from recent&#xD;
surveys on the constraints of cosmological parameters of five models in f(T) cosmology. The&#xD;
data used to constrain these models involves cosmic chronometers, the Pantheon supernovae type&#xD;
Ia data set and baryon acoustic oscillation data. The cosmological parameters which are allowed&#xD;
to vary in the Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis are the Hubble constant H0, the matter density&#xD;
parameter at current time Ωm,0 and the model parameter bi where (i = 1,2,3,4,5) depending on&#xD;
the model being considered. The H0 priors considered in this study are the Riess 2019, the tip of&#xD;
the red giant branch and the H0LiCOW priors as they have contributed to the recent H0 tension&#xD;
problem with the ΛCDM model. These priors impact all the cosmological parameters considered&#xD;
in this study. The introduction of a prior increases the posterior value of H0 depending on how&#xD;
large the prior value is. The uncertainty of this parameter is also lowered. Furthermore, Ωm,0 is&#xD;
affected in different ways depending on whether baryon acoustic oscillation data is included in the&#xD;
analysis. The introduction of this data results in lower posterior values of H0. ∆AIC and ∆BIC&#xD;
indicate that most of the considered models are quite close to ΛCDM. In models which have a&#xD;
ΛCDM limit, the obtained parameter values indicate that ΛCDM is preferred. Furthermore, in&#xD;
most cases the H0 tension is alleviated while in some, it is even resolved.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)</summary>
    <dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

