<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/9137" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/9137</id>
  <updated>2026-04-04T17:42:32Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-04T17:42:32Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Evaluating the use of oral contrast for abdominal CT</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/9138" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/9138</id>
    <updated>2017-08-08T10:04:09Z</updated>
    <published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Evaluating the use of oral contrast for abdominal CT
Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the impact on diagnostic efficacy of the use of different types&#xD;
of oral contrast media. The objectives were to establish image quality criteria for&#xD;
bowel evaluation on abdominopelvic CT; use the newly established image quality&#xD;
criteria to evaluate and compare image quality in abdominopelvic CT examinations&#xD;
using positive OCM, neutral OCM, and no OCM; and evaluate possible benefits in&#xD;
terms of costs for the medical imaging department.&#xD;
Methodology: Forty-six adult outpatients attending for a follow-up abdominopelvic&#xD;
CT for general oncological indications and who had previously undergone an&#xD;
abdominopelvic CT for which positive OCM was administered were recruited to the&#xD;
study. The previous abdominopelvic CT images with positive OCM (n = 46) were&#xD;
collected retrospectively whilst follow-up exams for which either water (n = 25) or&#xD;
no OCM (n = 21) were administered were collected prospectively, totalling 92&#xD;
abdominopelvic image sets. Three observers performed absolute visual grading&#xD;
analysis to assess the image quality of the images according to 24 image quality&#xD;
criteria. Data was analysed using visual grading characteristics. Costs were&#xD;
computed by calculating the monetary expenditure related to OCM administration&#xD;
per patient. Other costs, such as time, were also noted.&#xD;
Results: The results of this study demonstrate that abdominopelvic CT using positive&#xD;
OCM, water as a neutral OCM, or no OCM results in comparable image quality with&#xD;
regards to reproduction of abdominal structures, discrimination of the bowel from&#xD;
these structures, presence of artefacts, and visualisation of the amount of intraabdominal&#xD;
fat for all OCM protocols. The cost of positive OCM was found to be&#xD;
approximately €1.70 per patient. The water cost was considered negligible.&#xD;
Conclusion: Positive OCM, water or no OCM can be used for follow-up staging&#xD;
abdominopelvic CT for general oncological indications.
Description: M.SC.RADIOGRAPHY</summary>
    <dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

