<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/120934">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/120934</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121003" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-15T03:34:51Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121003">
    <title>Childhood asthma in the primary school environment</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121003</link>
    <description>Title: Childhood asthma in the primary school environment
Abstract: Background. There is a relatively high prevalence of school children with asthma in Malta, &#xD;
yet there is limited information about how these children are managed and supported &#xD;
while at school. &#xD;
Aims. The aim of this research was to gather data from relevant stakeholders using a mixed &#xD;
methods approach and, by doing so, provide a significant contribution to knowledge in this &#xD;
field.&#xD;
Methods. In the first phase of the study, a systematic review was performed to &#xD;
systematically review published literature to determine current asthma management &#xD;
practices by primary school teaching staff and any supporting legislation/ policies/ &#xD;
guidelines.&#xD;
In the second phase of the study, four key stakeholders, one from the Ministry for &#xD;
Education and Employment, two from the Ministry for Health and one from the Malta &#xD;
Union of Teachers (MUT) were interviewed to provide an aerial view of practices and &#xD;
polices relating to asthma in primary schools. In the third phase, a cross-sectional electronic &#xD;
survey investigating beliefs about medicines, knowledge of asthma, current practices, &#xD;
views and experiences relating to asthma was sent to all state primary heads of school and &#xD;
teachers in Malta. In the last phase, additional qualitative data was collected from teachers, &#xD;
parents of children with asthma and children with asthma through 3 separate focus group &#xD;
discussions. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used as a basis for both the &#xD;
qualitative component and some aspects of the quantitative component of the research.&#xD;
Results. Findings of the systematic review mainly identified that: teachers were unable to &#xD;
deal with an asthma exacerbation, teachers lacked knowledge regarding exercise-induced &#xD;
asthma and there is poor communication with parents of children with asthma. The only &#xD;
documented asthma legislation was found in New York schools (USA) and three studies &#xD;
reported that they had no asthma management guidelines or policies in schools.&#xD;
The TDF domains which emerged most from the interviews were knowledge (knowledge &#xD;
of health policy communication, lack of awareness about asthma, approaches in dealing &#xD;
with students having asthma), beliefs about consequences (disadvantages and barriers in &#xD;
relation to policies), environmental context and resources (lack of support and resources), &#xD;
emotion (teachers' fear in supporting children with asthma) and goals (need for school &#xD;
asthma policies). Significant issues such as lack of knowledge regarding individual student &#xD;
health, inadequate preparation in dealing with students having asthma, low asthma &#xD;
knowledge scores (heads of school mean score of 4.8±3.8; teachers’ mean score of &#xD;
5.5±3.3 out of a possible maximum of 14), and poor self-efficacy among teachers were &#xD;
identified from the responses of 19 heads of school and 167 teachers. Data collected also &#xD;
showed that teachers believe more in the benefit of medicines (mean=14.9) rather than &#xD;
their harm (mean=11.0) or overuse (mean=13.5). Heads of schools also believe more in &#xD;
the benefit (mean=15.3) than the harm (mean=9.0) or overuse (mean=11.8) of medicines. &#xD;
Data from focus groups with teachers, children with asthma and their parents were &#xD;
congruent with survey findings. Additionally, children demonstrated limited asthma &#xD;
knowledge and expressed their embarrassment in using the inhaler at school and in &#xD;
discussing their condition with the teacher. Communication barriers between the school &#xD;
and parents were also reported.&#xD;
Conclusion. Findings support the need for interventions to better support primary school &#xD;
children with asthma such as the establishment of effective communication between &#xD;
school staff and parents, staff training and standard procedures that are supported by &#xD;
policy. Protection by a law similar to 'good Samaritan' law should be offered to teachers&#xD;
thereby limiting the liability of the teaching staff when supporting students with&#xD;
medicines administration.
Description: M.SC.PHARMACOLOGY</description>
    <dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

