<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121078">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121078</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/122431" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-05-03T11:07:56Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/122431">
    <title>The cancer patient’s lived experience of the health system in Malta</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/122431</link>
    <description>Title: The cancer patient’s lived experience of the health system in Malta
Abstract: This qualitative study explores the experiences of cancer patients and their &#xD;
support networks during their treatment. Within the context of public health &#xD;
services in Malta, it investigated the research question: How do cancer patients, &#xD;
their families and significant others live their experience as health service users &#xD;
during the illness? The Donabedian approach to service evaluation, &#xD;
encompassing structure, process and outcome, served as a guiding theoretical &#xD;
framework. &#xD;
Six patients and their significant others accepted an invitation by their medical &#xD;
consultant to be interviewed in-depth. Their detailed narratives were analysed &#xD;
using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Five superordinate &#xD;
themes emerged: positive treatment experience; overcoming identified service &#xD;
limitations; humanity of care; centrality of support, and burden of treatment. IPA’s &#xD;
thorough idiographic approach captured the unique understanding through which &#xD;
each participant interpreted the cancer treatment reality. &#xD;
Participants expressed a generally positive experience of the health services, &#xD;
albeit identifying limitations needing ongoing improvement efforts that respond to &#xD;
their needs. Humane care was deemed indispensable, particularly at &#xD;
communication of diagnosis. Support, both familial and work related, were &#xD;
considered central to the management of their treatment. The burden of &#xD;
treatment experienced accentuates the criticality of cancer treatment structures &#xD;
and processes that respond to each patient’s unique experience to render the &#xD;
burden more manageable. A major weakness elicited from this study is the &#xD;
absence of structures and processes, including palliative care protocols, that &#xD;
respond to the particular needs of these patients upon admission to the acute &#xD;
care hospital. &#xD;
Notwithstanding the limitations around the small size of this study, the IPA design &#xD;
provided a means for integrating user input into health policy and services design &#xD;
and evaluation. It highlighted the importance of recognising the individuality of &#xD;
cancer treatment experiences, and the necessity that such experiences inform &#xD;
treatment policies and protocols to better serve the distinctiveness of each cancer &#xD;
treatment journey.
Description: M.SC.HEALTH SERVICES MANGT.</description>
    <dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

