<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/13257">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/13257</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/62998" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-05-05T12:32:05Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/62998">
    <title>The reader as detective : a Text World Theory analysis of the classical whodunit</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/62998</link>
    <description>Title: The reader as detective : a Text World Theory analysis of the classical whodunit
Abstract: This dissertation seeks to identify cognitive reasons which explain why readers &#xD;
typically do not reach the correct solution when reading detective novels. It assumes the &#xD;
presence of both true and false clues in these texts, as well as multiple suspects, and analyses &#xD;
whether these are presented in a way that allows the reader a fair chance of guessing correctly. &#xD;
These questions will be explored in two novels from different time periods: Agatha Christie’s &#xD;
Death in the Clouds (1935) and Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Hound of the Baskervilles (1902). &#xD;
They will be analysed and compared primarily through Paul Werth’s cognitive linguistic Text &#xD;
World Theory framework and Joanna Gavins’s elaboration of it, although reference to other &#xD;
cognitive theories will be made. &#xD;
The opening chapter will explain in more detail the purpose of this dissertation and the &#xD;
methodology I will be adopting. Chapter 2 will contextualise the study, first by describing the &#xD;
typical features of the whodunit genre until Christie’s time, and then by contextualising Text &#xD;
World Theory in relation to other cognitive theories and explaining what it is. Chapters 3 and &#xD;
4 will apply the ideas presented in Chapter 2 to Christie’s and Conan Doyle’s novels &#xD;
respectively. Each chapter will seek to establish the reasons why readers fail to infer the correct &#xD;
solution in that particular novel. &#xD;
Chapter 5 will then compare and contrast these two analyses, outlining the differences &#xD;
in the two novels and explaining why Text World Theory is appropriate to explain the reader’s &#xD;
processing of both texts. The final chapter will attempt to answer the question posed in Chapter &#xD;
1 by showing how both texts permit a plausible alternative solution which the reader cannot &#xD;
eliminate on the basis of textual elements. It will also relate this finding to the attractiveness of &#xD;
the genre and suggest possible topics for further study.
Description: B.A.(HONS)ENGLISH</description>
    <dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

