<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/139868">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/139868</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/140621" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-11T12:32:03Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/140621">
    <title>Mapping kink : an archipelago of pleasure</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/140621</link>
    <description>Title: Mapping kink : an archipelago of pleasure
Abstract: This dissertation explores the relationship with kink in a Maltese context. While tracing the &#xD;
history of kink in Malta is difficult, the emergence of fetish-adjacent public events since &#xD;
lockdown seemed to mark a turn. This is also greatly contrasted with the sharp increase in &#xD;
sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (ECDC, 2024; WHO, 2023) thought to be linked to &#xD;
chemsex parties (Gamoudi cited in Gauci Cunningham, 2024) which stand in direct opposition &#xD;
to the ‘safe, sane, consensual’ framework (Weiss, 2011) heralded by the imported kink scene. &#xD;
The questions this research seeks to answer are two-fold: how does the practice of kink inform&#xD;
and transform the practitioner’s relationship with their self-body concept? And how does the &#xD;
local context shape the way people engage with kink? Drawing upon ethnographic data &#xD;
gathered from unstructured interviews with kink practitioners and participant observation at &#xD;
fetish events, the discussion reveals the tensions between intimacy and public performance, &#xD;
individual identity and a fragmented sense of belonging. &#xD;
Using a lens informed by queer theory (Halperin, 1995; Probyn, 2016), queer theology &#xD;
(MacKendrick, 2018) and sociology of the skin (Ahmed and Stacey, 2001), I argue that for &#xD;
seasoned practitioners, the practice of kink is transformative. It gives rise to the experiential &#xD;
self as a form of becoming, informing a being-with-others through risk and trust. However, this &#xD;
does not always directly translate in a public context, resulting in a sphere that is marked by &#xD;
ambivalence. The club setting, interpreted as a heterotopic space (Foucault, 1986; Haywood, &#xD;
2022; Lee, 2023), points to the contradictions between the perceived subversive ethos of kink &#xD;
and its place in an insular setting. The broader context of the market, neoliberal rationality &#xD;
(Harvey, 1992) and post-colonial identities (Bhabha, 2004; 2016) also play a role in the &#xD;
enacting and perception of kink.&#xD;
Kink becomes not only a site of personal transformation but also points to the limits and &#xD;
possibilities of intimate community-building within a late capitalist, postcolonial and insular &#xD;
setting. In this sense, bodies, too, drift apart.
Description: B.A. (Hons)(Melit.)</description>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

