<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141309">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141309</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141994" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-26T22:00:04Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141994">
    <title>Autistic involvement in enhancing accessibility in archaeological sites</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141994</link>
    <description>Title: Autistic involvement in enhancing accessibility in archaeological sites
Abstract: In recent years, several heritage sites from museums to archaeological sites have begun to &#xD;
implement accessible measures to make them more accessible to disabled people, in line with &#xD;
legislation and international conventions. However, the people that are meant to directly &#xD;
benefit from accessible measures are not often consulted on the design and implementation. &#xD;
The scope of the present study is to investigate what accessibility in archaeological sites &#xD;
would look like from the autistic perspective. A qualitative approach was used to carry out &#xD;
this research. The researcher recruited autistic participants and walked with them around two &#xD;
archaeological sites to assess the features, aspects and experience that are accessible to them &#xD;
as autistic individuals in an unstructured interview. The sites chosen were Ħaġar Qim and &#xD;
Mnajdra Archaeological Park and Għar Dalam. The participants identified several barriers &#xD;
that prevented them from enjoying their experience while walking around the sites. Ħaġar &#xD;
Qim had more barriers than Għar Dalam according to the participants’ responses. These &#xD;
responses were then analysed using thematic analysis. The issues raised included direction &#xD;
and wayfinding, the sensory environment, the participants’ willingness to engage with the &#xD;
site, the shortcomings of accessibility for other people with disabilities as well as &#xD;
recommendations to improve the accessibility at both sites. Each theme is discussed within &#xD;
the context of each site. &#xD;
This research demonstrated the potential for including autistic voices in the discourse of &#xD;
accessibility to cultural heritage. The participants have also suggested solutions to improve &#xD;
accessibility to archaeological sites not just for them but for other disabled people who can &#xD;
benefit from accessible measures, such as reducing noise levels, inputting more tactile and &#xD;
interactive exhibits to explore, better signage and wayfinding, and providing more &#xD;
information that can be easily accessible before visiting the site.
Description: M.A.(Melit.)</description>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

