<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145212">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145212</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149249" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146104" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-10-03T09:07:22Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149249">
    <title>Climate vulnerabilities in small island developing states : a case study of Wainibuku Hart community, Fiji</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149249</link>
    <description>Title: Climate vulnerabilities in small island developing states : a case study of Wainibuku Hart community, Fiji
Abstract: Small Island Developing States (SIDS) in the Pacific face accelerating and disproportionate climate &#xD;
impacts, and yet peri-urban settlements within these island nations continue to expand as &#xD;
destinations for people relocating from rural and outer-island communities. These communities &#xD;
remain structurally vulnerable while climate change compounds these existing stressors. Despite &#xD;
their growing significance, peri-urban settlements remain among the least studied and least &#xD;
served by adaptation policies in the Pacific region. This study addresses this empirical gap through &#xD;
a community-level case study of climate change vulnerability and adaptive capacity in the &#xD;
Wainibuku Housing Assistance and Relief Trust (HART) Community in Nasinu, Fiji. Drawing on the &#xD;
exposure-sensitivity-adaptive capacity framework and contextual vulnerability theory, this study &#xD;
employed a mixed-methods design. Data were collected through 40 structured household &#xD;
surveys and four Talanoa discussions with fourteen participants. Findings reveal cascading &#xD;
vulnerability outcomes, with women and lower-income households bearing disproportionate &#xD;
burdens. However, residents demonstrate substantial adaptive capacity through incremental &#xD;
household strategies and reciprocal social networks rooted in traditional knowledge systems. A &#xD;
critical determinant differentiating households with sustained adaptive capacity from those &#xD;
without was the degree of inclusion in formal adaptation policy structures. This study contributes &#xD;
evidence from an underrepresented context in Pacific climate research. It highlights that effective &#xD;
adaptation policy must move beyond top-down, technocratic approaches and involve &#xD;
communities from the earliest stages of policy design to implementation. Such approaches are &#xD;
essential to ensure that adaptation interventions effectively reach and serve communities like &#xD;
Wainibuku.
Description: M.A.(Melit.)</description>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146104">
    <title>Dissonances between policy framework and customary practice in gender equality of small island developing states : the case of LGBTQI+ rights in Mauritius</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146104</link>
    <description>Title: Dissonances between policy framework and customary practice in gender equality of small island developing states : the case of LGBTQI+ rights in Mauritius
Abstract: Despite growing international recognition of LGBTQI+ rights, Small Island Developing States &#xD;
(SIDS) continue to face challenges in translating formal legal commitments into substantive &#xD;
equality. This dissertation examines the dissonance between State-level legal and policy &#xD;
frameworks and entrenched normative practices shaping the lived experiences of LGBTQI+ &#xD;
individuals in Mauritius. Although Mauritius has ratified key international human rights &#xD;
instruments and experienced progressive judicial developments, these advances remain &#xD;
unevenly realised due to persistent socio-cultural, religious, and institutional barriers. &#xD;
Employing a qualitative research design, the study integrates legal and policy analysis with &#xD;
semi-structured interviews conducted with LGBTQI+ individuals to assess the alignment &#xD;
between legal commitments and lived realities. The findings reveal that, notwithstanding &#xD;
constitutional guarantees, international obligations, and limited anti-discrimination &#xD;
protections, LGBTQI+ persons in Mauritius continue to face marginalisation in healthcare, &#xD;
employment, family life, and access to justice. These exclusions are sustained not by formal &#xD;
customary law, but by deeply embedded normative practices, heteronormative social &#xD;
structures, religious conservatism, and weak institutional accountability within a small island &#xD;
context characterised by dense social networks and limited anonymity. &#xD;
Grounded in the theoretical frameworks of intersectionality and legal pluralism, the &#xD;
dissertation argues that legal reform alone is insufficient to achieve substantive equality in &#xD;
SIDS. Instead, meaningful change requires shifts in social norms, strengthened institutional &#xD;
responsiveness, and inclusive policymaking that centres marginalised LGBTQI+ voices. The &#xD;
study concludes with context-specific recommendations to bridge the persistent gap between &#xD;
policy and practice relating to LGBTQI+ rights in Mauritius.
Description: M.A.(Melit.)</description>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

