<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15060">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15060</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15802" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-06-30T06:27:16Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15802">
    <title>Complementary therapies perception of staff working in an Oncology department</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15802</link>
    <description>Title: Complementary therapies perception of staff working in an Oncology department
Abstract: Purpose:&#xD;
The purpose of the study was to assess the perception of oncology professionals working at&#xD;
a local state oncology hospital, on the use of complementary therapies (CTs) with&#xD;
conventional cancer treatment by cancer patients. The study also investigated whether these&#xD;
professionals are interested in furthering their education on CTs and explored their views&#xD;
about further integrating these therapies with conventional cancer treatment.&#xD;
Methodology:&#xD;
The study adopted a descriptive, cross-sectional, non-experimental and quantitative&#xD;
research design, with some qualitative aspects. All the accessible population, which&#xD;
consisted of 59 oncology professionals, was included in this study. The data was collected&#xD;
by distributing a self-designed questionnaire developed based on literature findings.&#xD;
Results:&#xD;
The study had a response rate of 61%. Findings indicated that both radiographers and&#xD;
nurses have positive perceptions of CTs whilst oncology doctors presented a more critical&#xD;
approach towards the use of CTs alongside conventional treatment. All of the nurses&#xD;
(100%) and 94.7% of the radiographers were interested in training on CTs, compared to&#xD;
only 16.7% of oncology doctors. Recommendation of CTs to cancer patients was common&#xD;
amongst radiographers and nurses as 63.2% and 81.8% respectively, stated to have&#xD;
recommended CTs to their patients compared to only 16.7% of oncology doctors.&#xD;
Additionally, 94.7% of radiographers and 90.9% of nurses were in favour of incorporating&#xD;
CTs as part of cancer treatment, however, only 16.7% of oncology doctors supported this&#xD;
idea.&#xD;
Conclusions and Recommendations:&#xD;
The study shows that there is the need of more evidence-based research to support the use&#xD;
of CTs in cancer care. Healthcare professionals would benefit from further training on CTs.&#xD;
In particular, oncology doctors need to be more informed about the benefits of these&#xD;
therapies while nurses and radiographers need to be more informed about possible harmful&#xD;
interactions of CTs with conventional therapies.
Description: B.SC.(HONS)RADIOGRAPHY</description>
    <dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

