<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15375">
    <title>OAR@UM Community:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15375</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149620" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149461" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149455" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149418" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-10-06T07:41:28Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149620">
    <title>Liturgia, catechesi e famiglia</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149620</link>
    <description>Title: Liturgia, catechesi e famiglia
Authors: Sultana, Carl-Mario
Abstract: Relazionare correttamente la catechesi, la liturgia e la famiglia costituisce&#xD;
una delle maggiori sfide della nostra epoca contemporanea in campo pastorale.&#xD;
La Chiesa ha sempre considerato la famiglia come l'ambito privilegiato in cui può&#xD;
avvenire la trasmissione della fede, vedendola come una scuola in cui la fede e&#xD;
la tradizione viva vengono impartite con l'obiettivo «di raggiungere e quasi sconvolgere&#xD;
mediante la forza del Vangelo i criteri di giudizio, i valori determinanti, i&#xD;
punti d'interesse, le linee di pensiero, le fonti ispiratrici e i modelli di vita dell'umanità&#xD;
». In effetti, il ruolo della famiglia nell'evangelizzazione è sempre stato&#xD;
un tema di primo piano nei documenti della Chiesa. [estratto]</description>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149461">
    <title>Beyond information : wisdom, human judgment, and catholic religious education in the age of generative AI</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149461</link>
    <description>Title: Beyond information : wisdom, human judgment, and catholic religious education in the age of generative AI
Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) intensifies a long-standing question for religious education (RE): what is education for when information, explanation, and polished synthesis are available on demand? Using Catholic religious education (CRE) as a situated case, this conceptual article argues that wisdom should orient RE without displacing knowledge. Drawing on virtue ethics, Catholic thought, philosophy of education, and recent scholarship on digital religion and AI, it develops four dimensions of wisdom-centered RE: epistemic judgment, practical-moral discernment, relational responsibility, and tradition-situated orientation toward ultimate goods. It concludes with implications for curriculum, pedagogy, assessment, teacher formation, and interfaith and public RE.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149455">
    <title>Wounded hope : narrative identity, vulnerability, and forgiveness in religious education</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149455</link>
    <description>Title: Wounded hope : narrative identity, vulnerability, and forgiveness in religious education
Abstract: Contemporary religious education encounters young people whose identities are formed amid vulnerability, social fragmentation, moral plurality, and digitally mediated narratives of self and world. This conceptual article develops wounded hope as a distinctive hermeneutical and pedagogical construct for religious education (RE). Wounded hope names an orientation that holds truthful memory of irreversible harm together with an ethically open future in which neither identity nor agency is exhausted by the wound. Paul Ricoeur supplies the principal hermeneutical architecture through narrative identity, mimesis, memory, recognition, and refiguration. Gabriel Marcel, Jürgen Moltmann, Paulo Freire, and Thomas Groome deepen and correct that architecture through philosophical hope, eschatological contradiction, critical praxis, and shared Christian praxis. Recent scholarship on Ricoeur, vulnerability, trauma-responsive education, youth flourishing, church-school climate, and digital religion is brought into dialogue with these foundational sources. The article argues that wounded hope is not optimism, resilience, post-traumatic growth, or a theology of redemptive suffering. It further contends that forgiveness in RE must remain a religious and ethical possibility rather than a compulsory educational outcome, and must be distinguished from forgetting, excusing, reconciliation, restored trust, and the suspension of justice. Developed from within a Catholic-Christian horizon while remaining dialogically open to wider RE, the article proposes a Narrative Pedagogy of Wounded Hope structured by five commitments: narrative hospitality, hermeneutical dialogue, critical discernment, hopeful refiguration, and ethical agency. Reflexively, the proposal also examines its own risks: theological overreach, therapeutic colonisation of education, the privileging of coherence, and the temptation to make hope itself coercive. Wounded hope is therefore offered not as a technique for repairing learners but as a disciplined educational disposition for inhabiting unfinished stories truthfully, critically, and hopefully. [excerpt]</description>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149418">
    <title>Thinking faithfully together : catholic religious education, ethics, and the philosophy for children pedagogy</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149418</link>
    <description>Title: Thinking faithfully together : catholic religious education, ethics, and the philosophy for children pedagogy
Authors: Wright, Edward
Abstract: This conceptual article examines how Catholic Religious Education (CRE) and Ethics in&#xD;
Maltese schools might enter a constructive pedagogical dialogue while retaining distinct&#xD;
disciplinary identities. Rather than proposing curricular merger, hierarchy, or a common&#xD;
epistemology, it advances the more limited claim that a critically appropriated Philosophy for Children (P4C) pedagogy and its Community of Inquiry (CoI) can function as a&#xD;
shared pedagogical grammar. The Maltese case is analytically useful because Ethics is&#xD;
institutionally associated with P4C while recent CRE studies call for more student-centred,&#xD;
constructivist, and existentially responsive approaches. The article treats this proximity as&#xD;
a problem of disciplined borrowing: which dialogical practices can travel across subject&#xD;
boundaries, under what conditions, and what must remain discipline-specific? Drawing&#xD;
on Lipman and sustained critical engagement with Dewey, Freire, Arendt, and Merton,&#xD;
it identifies complementary but non-identical resources for experience-based inquiry, dialogical agency, judgement in plurality, and contemplative attention. Their tensions are&#xD;
retained rather than harmonised. Recent empirical and theoretical literature is used to&#xD;
qualify the scope of the proposal. The resulting framework develops implications for classroom practice, assessment, collaborative professional development, and future empirical&#xD;
research. Its contribution is therefore a bounded model of pedagogical dialogue: CRE&#xD;
may become more dialogical without treating theological sources as interchangeable with&#xD;
philosophical warrants, while Ethics may engage religiously situated moral worlds without&#xD;
compromising philosophical autonomy.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

