https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/17620 Previously known as Department of Information Policy & Governance Unit 2026-04-27T13:05:07Z https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/135064 Title: The jurisdictional game in regulating law enforcement access to data across borders Abstract: This work and its abstract are both under embargo until the restriction is lifted. Description: Ph.D.(Melit.) 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/135055 Title: Gaps and UNintended consequences : an analysis of global governance discourse on AI use in counter-terrorism, intelligence, and security Abstract: This work and its abstract are both under embargo until the restriction is lifted. Description: Ph.D.(Melit.) 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/94652 Title: Liability for medical expert systems : an introduction to the legal implications Authors: Cannataci, Joseph A. Abstract: Some of the possible legal implications of the production, marketing and use of expert systems are examined in this paper. The relevance of a legally useful definition of expert systems, comprising systems designed for use by both laymen and professionals, is related to the distinctions inherent in the legal doctrine underlying provision of goods and provision of services. The liability of the sellers and users of, and contributors to, expert systems are examined in terms of professional malpractice as well as product liability. A recurring theme indicates that legislators may be inclined to restrict possibilities of liability suits in order to avoid disincentives to the creation of expert systems. 1989-01-01T00:00:00Z https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/94651 Title: Law, liability and expert systems Authors: Cannataci, Joseph A. Abstract: This paper examines some of the possible legal implications of the production, marketing and use of expert systems. The relevance of a legally useful definition of expert systems, comprising systems designed for use both by laymen and professionals, is related to the distinctions inherent in the legal doctrine underlying provision of goods and provision of services. The liability of the sellers and users of, and contributors to, expert systems are examined in terms of professional malpractice as well as product liability. A recurring theme indicates that legislators may be inclined to restrict possibilities of liability suits in order to avoid disincentives to the creation of expert systems. 1989-01-01T00:00:00Z