<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26661">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26661</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27295" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27294" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27293" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27292" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-08-08T11:04:40Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27295">
    <title>Ethical issues in practice for nurses, midwives and family medicine : proceedings</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27295</link>
    <description>Title: Ethical issues in practice for nurses, midwives and family medicine : proceedings
Editors: Cauchi, M.N.
Abstract: Proceedings of the conference organised by the Bioethics Consultative Committee, Minstory of Health.</description>
    <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27294">
    <title>In search of a European approach to bioethics : the emergence of a common Euro-Mediterranean bioethical culture</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27294</link>
    <description>Title: In search of a European approach to bioethics : the emergence of a common Euro-Mediterranean bioethical culture
Abstract: Though bioethics developed as a general phenomenon, it would be a&#xD;
mistake not to recognise the particular cultural articulation of bioethics.&#xD;
Bioethics is not the product of reason alone, independent of culture.&#xD;
The fundamental ethos of applied ethics, its methodology and language,&#xD;
its concerns and emphases, and its very institutionalization have been&#xD;
shaped by beliefs, values, and modes of thinking grounded in specific&#xD;
social and cultural traditions. Moreover, bioethics literature reflects&#xD;
and articulates the socio-cultural value system within and through which&#xD;
it operates. It is, therefore, false to assume that bioethical theories and&#xD;
moral views are transculturaI.</description>
    <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27293">
    <title>Phenomenological approaches to the doctor-patient relationship</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27293</link>
    <description>Title: Phenomenological approaches to the doctor-patient relationship
Abstract: Scholars largely agree that there is a need today for a comprehensive&#xD;
philosophy of medicine (Pellegrino, 2001; Wildes 2001). It is with&#xD;
such a foundation that we analyze moral dilemmas generated by medical&#xD;
technology, such as genetic technologies and the uses (and misuses) of&#xD;
genetic testing and screening. In this respect however there is profound&#xD;
disagreement on what a philosophy of medicine should look like. The&#xD;
socially constructed philosophy as proposed by various authors&#xD;
including Kevin Wildes and Robert Veatch contrasts with the&#xD;
teleological approaches as proposed by Edmund Pellegrino. I shall&#xD;
briefly look at both here, bowing admittedly in favour of a teleological&#xD;
approach, using the basis of genetic testing as a reason to why an&#xD;
ontology of the doctor-patient relationship is, in my opinion, the best&#xD;
approach for a comprehensive philosophy of medicine, even in the&#xD;
post-modern world we live in.</description>
    <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27292">
    <title>Outcomes of first meeting on ethics in family medicine</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27292</link>
    <description>Title: Outcomes of first meeting on ethics in family medicine
Abstract: The point we are trying to reach here is whether only specialists in&#xD;
family medicine are to be allowed to do General Practice, or whether&#xD;
anyone can do so. What would be the point of being able to call yourself&#xD;
a specialist in family medicine, having been obliged to go through&#xD;
three years of vocational training, when then someone who opted not&#xD;
to do this would be able to do the same work in the same pool of&#xD;
patients that you work in?</description>
    <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

